Skip to content

V
V8
Switch branch/tag
  1. 22 Sep, 2021 1 commit
  3. 24 Aug, 2021 1 commit
    • Dan Elphick's avatar
      Reland "[include] Split out v8.h" · ec06bb6c
      Dan Elphick authored 
      This is a reland of d1b27019

Fixes include:
Adding missing file to bazel build
Forward-declaring classing before friend-classing them to fix win/gcc
Add missing v8-isolate.h include for vtune builds

Original change's description:
> [include] Split out v8.h
>
> This moves every single class/function out of include/v8.h into a
> separate header in include/, which v8.h then includes so that
> externally nothing appears to have changed.
>
> Every include of v8.h from inside v8 has been changed to a more
> fine-grained include.
>
> Previously inline functions defined at the bottom of v8.h would call
> private non-inline functions in the V8 class. Since that class is now
> in v8-initialization.h and is rarely included (as that would create
> dependency cycles), this is not possible and so those methods have been
> moved out of the V8 class into the namespace v8::api_internal.
>
> None of the previous files in include/ now #include v8.h, which means
> if embedders were relying on this transitive dependency then it will
> give compile failures.
>
> v8-inspector.h does depend on v8-scripts.h for the time being to ensure
> that Chrome continue to compile but that change will be reverted once
> those transitive #includes in chrome are changed to include it directly.
>
> Full design:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rTD--I8hCAr-Rho1WTumZzFKaDpEp0IJ8ejZtk4nJdA/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Bug: v8:11965
> Change-Id: I53b84b29581632710edc80eb11f819c2097a2877
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3097448
> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76424}

Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_vtunejit
Bug: v8:11965
Change-Id: I99f5d3a73bf8fe25b650adfaf9567dc4e44a09e6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3113629Reviewed-by: 's avatarLeszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarCamillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarMichael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarJakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarSimon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76460}
      ec06bb6c
  5. 23 Aug, 2021 2 commits
    • Dan Elphick's avatar
      Revert "[include] Split out v8.h" · 44fe02ce
      Dan Elphick authored 
      This reverts commit d1b27019.

Reason for revert: Broke vtune build, tsan build and possibly others

Original change's description:
> [include] Split out v8.h
>
> This moves every single class/function out of include/v8.h into a
> separate header in include/, which v8.h then includes so that
> externally nothing appears to have changed.
>
> Every include of v8.h from inside v8 has been changed to a more
> fine-grained include.
>
> Previously inline functions defined at the bottom of v8.h would call
> private non-inline functions in the V8 class. Since that class is now
> in v8-initialization.h and is rarely included (as that would create
> dependency cycles), this is not possible and so those methods have been
> moved out of the V8 class into the namespace v8::api_internal.
>
> None of the previous files in include/ now #include v8.h, which means
> if embedders were relying on this transitive dependency then it will
> give compile failures.
>
> v8-inspector.h does depend on v8-scripts.h for the time being to ensure
> that Chrome continue to compile but that change will be reverted once
> those transitive #includes in chrome are changed to include it directly.
>
> Full design:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rTD--I8hCAr-Rho1WTumZzFKaDpEp0IJ8ejZtk4nJdA/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Bug: v8:11965
> Change-Id: I53b84b29581632710edc80eb11f819c2097a2877
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3097448
> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76424}

Bug: v8:11965
Change-Id: Id57313ae992e720c8b19abc975cd69729e1344aa
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3113627
Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Owners-Override: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76428}
      44fe02ce
    • Dan Elphick's avatar
      [include] Split out v8.h · d1b27019
      Dan Elphick authored 
      This moves every single class/function out of include/v8.h into a
separate header in include/, which v8.h then includes so that
externally nothing appears to have changed.

Every include of v8.h from inside v8 has been changed to a more
fine-grained include.

Previously inline functions defined at the bottom of v8.h would call
private non-inline functions in the V8 class. Since that class is now
in v8-initialization.h and is rarely included (as that would create
dependency cycles), this is not possible and so those methods have been
moved out of the V8 class into the namespace v8::api_internal.

None of the previous files in include/ now #include v8.h, which means
if embedders were relying on this transitive dependency then it will
give compile failures.

v8-inspector.h does depend on v8-scripts.h for the time being to ensure
that Chrome continue to compile but that change will be reverted once
those transitive #includes in chrome are changed to include it directly.

Full design:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rTD--I8hCAr-Rho1WTumZzFKaDpEp0IJ8ejZtk4nJdA/edit?usp=sharing

Bug: v8:11965
Change-Id: I53b84b29581632710edc80eb11f819c2097a2877
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3097448Reviewed-by: 's avatarYang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarCamillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarJakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarLeszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarMichael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76424}
      d1b27019
  7. 19 Aug, 2021 1 commit
  9. 22 Jul, 2021 1 commit
  11. 28 Jun, 2021 1 commit
  13. 22 Jun, 2021 1 commit
  15. 18 Jun, 2021 1 commit
  17. 09 Feb, 2021 1 commit
  19. 19 Jan, 2021 1 commit
    • Seth Brenith's avatar
      [arm][arm64] Use normal fp semantics in JSEntry · a016c9fe
      Seth Brenith authored 
      On arm64, Windows Performance Recorder gets confused by the fact that fp
in Builtins_JSEntry doesn't point to the saved {fp, lr} pair for the
caller frame. The expected usage of fp is documented in [1]:

  The frame pointer (x29) is required for compatibility with fast stack
  walking used by ETW and other services. It must point to the previous
  {x29, x30} pair on the stack.

In slightly more detail, the Windows function RtlWalkFrameChain is
responsible for generating stack traces during profiling with Windows
Performance Recorder, and that function relies on the rule quoted above.
Notably, it does not make any effort to read the unwinding data that one
could obtain with RtlLookupFunctionEntry. Stack walks using that data,
such as those performed by WinDbg and the cctest StackUnwindingWin64,
work fine.

It would be convenient if we could use fp in a more standard way during
JSEntry so that Windows profiling tools work correctly. (We can also
reduce JSEntry by two instructions in doing so.)

Both arm and arm64 currently put a -1 value on the stack at the location
that fp points to. This could prevent accidental access during the
epilog of JSEntry, where fp might be zero. However, we believe that this
protection is no longer necessary, and any bug that causes a read from
fp during the end of JSEntry would cause various CQ failures.

[1] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64-windows-abi-conventions?view=msvc-160

Change-Id: Iece5666129b9188fc4c12007809b50f046f4044f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2607636
Commit-Queue: Seth Brenith <seth.brenith@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarJakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarRoss McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72165}
      a016c9fe
  21. 12 Jan, 2021 1 commit
  23. 14 Dec, 2020 1 commit
  25. 10 Dec, 2020 1 commit
  27. 09 Dec, 2020 2 commits
  29. 07 Dec, 2020 1 commit
  31. 03 Dec, 2020 2 commits
  33. 02 Dec, 2020 2 commits
  35. 30 Nov, 2020 2 commits
  37. 25 Nov, 2020 2 commits
  39. 24 Nov, 2020 1 commit
  41. 02 Nov, 2020 1 commit
  43. 28 Oct, 2020 2 commits
  45. 27 Oct, 2020 3 commits
  47. 20 Oct, 2020 1 commit
  49. 11 Aug, 2020 1 commit
    • Ng Zhi An's avatar
      Reland "[wasm-simd][arm] Use vmov to move all ones to register" · 9b9c6b0e
      Ng Zhi An authored 
      This is a reland of 57242a05

no-sse4.1 builds were failing due to missing simd-scalar-lowering
for s128.const, this reland adds that implementation.

Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][arm] Use vmov to move all ones to register
>
> vceq(dst, dst, dst) does not seem to always set the register to all
> ones. The right way should be be to use vmov (immediate) anyway. This
> was not supported in the assembler yet, so we need changes to the
> assembler, diassembler, and simulator.
>
> There is an unfortunate fork in logic in the simulator, due to the way
> the switches are set up, vmov (imm) logic is duplicated across two
> different cases, because the switch looks at the top bit of the
> immediate. Refactoring this will be a bigger change that is irrelevant
> for this bug, so I'm putting that off for now. Instead we extract the
> core of vmov (imm) into helpers and call it in the two cases.
>
> Bug: chromium:1112124
> Change-Id: I283dbcd86cb0572e5ee720835f897b51fae96701
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2337503
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69315}

Bug: chromium:1112124
Change-Id: Id450e5cea41f7a569e49be8386a7788ca8f00658
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2346937Reviewed-by: 's avatarBill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarJakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69346}
      9b9c6b0e
  51. 10 Aug, 2020 2 commits
    • Bill Budge's avatar
      Revert "[wasm-simd][arm] Use vmov to move all ones to register" · ff503fd4
      Bill Budge authored 
      This reverts commit 57242a05.

Reason for revert: regression tests fails:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20debug/31477

Original change's description:
> [wasm-simd][arm] Use vmov to move all ones to register
> 
> vceq(dst, dst, dst) does not seem to always set the register to all
> ones. The right way should be be to use vmov (immediate) anyway. This
> was not supported in the assembler yet, so we need changes to the
> assembler, diassembler, and simulator.
> 
> There is an unfortunate fork in logic in the simulator, due to the way
> the switches are set up, vmov (imm) logic is duplicated across two
> different cases, because the switch looks at the top bit of the
> immediate. Refactoring this will be a bigger change that is irrelevant
> for this bug, so I'm putting that off for now. Instead we extract the
> core of vmov (imm) into helpers and call it in the two cases.
> 
> Bug: chromium:1112124
> Change-Id: I283dbcd86cb0572e5ee720835f897b51fae96701
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2337503
> Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69315}

TBR=bbudge@chromium.org,jkummerow@chromium.org,v8-arm-ports@googlegroups.com,zhin@chromium.org

Change-Id: I5d9d1dcb81771f71001d959ec5a03a43a11c4233
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:1112124
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2347211Reviewed-by: 's avatarBill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69316}
      ff503fd4
    • Ng Zhi An's avatar
      [wasm-simd][arm] Use vmov to move all ones to register · 57242a05
      Ng Zhi An authored 
      vceq(dst, dst, dst) does not seem to always set the register to all
ones. The right way should be be to use vmov (immediate) anyway. This
was not supported in the assembler yet, so we need changes to the
assembler, diassembler, and simulator.

There is an unfortunate fork in logic in the simulator, due to the way
the switches are set up, vmov (imm) logic is duplicated across two
different cases, because the switch looks at the top bit of the
immediate. Refactoring this will be a bigger change that is irrelevant
for this bug, so I'm putting that off for now. Instead we extract the
core of vmov (imm) into helpers and call it in the two cases.

Bug: chromium:1112124
Change-Id: I283dbcd86cb0572e5ee720835f897b51fae96701
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2337503
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarJakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarBill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69315}
      57242a05
  53. 25 Jun, 2020 1 commit
  55. 24 Jun, 2020 1 commit
  57. 23 Jun, 2020 2 commits