- 24 Aug, 2015 4 commits
-
-
mstarzinger authored
R=bmeurer@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1306023002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30320}
-
yangguo authored
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1307963002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30319}
-
yangguo authored
Revert of Parse arrow functions at proper precedence level (patchset #2 id:60001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1286383005/ ) Reason for revert: Breaks layout test. Please change test expectation on blink first. --- /mnt/data/b/build/slave/V8-Blink_Linux_64/build/layout-test-results/inspector/sources/debugger-pause/debugger-pause-in-internal-expected.txt +++ /mnt/data/b/build/slave/V8-Blink_Linux_64/build/layout-test-results/inspector/sources/debugger-pause/debugger-pause-in-internal-actual.txt @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -CONSOLE ERROR: line 9: Uncaught SyntaxError: Expected () to start arrow function, but got '}' instead of '=>' +CONSOLE ERROR: line 9: Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected token ) Tests that pause on exception in internal script does not crash. Script source was shown. Original issue's description: > Parse arrow functions at proper precedence level > > BUG=v8:4211 > LOG=Y > R=rossberg@chromium.org > > Committed: https://crrev.com/9271b0ccf9ddb217deb1f0b9ef9b59b64dc40214 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30298} TBR=rossberg@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,fennyfanny655@gmail.com,machenbach@chromium.org,wingo@igalia.com NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=v8:4211 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1315503002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30318}
-
mstarzinger authored
R=titzer@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1309883002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30317}
-
- 22 Aug, 2015 2 commits
-
-
littledan authored
Revert of Add a separate scope for switch (patchset #7 id:120001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1293283002/ ) Reason for revert: Breaks cctest/test-cpu-profiler/SourceLocation on nosnap Original issue's description: > Add a separate scope for switch > > The ES2015 specification for switch statements 13.12.11 specifies that > they get their own lexical scope. This patch introduces such a scope > through a complex desugaring in terms of blocks, done so that Crankshaft > does not have to be updated to support multiple constructs providing > scopes. > > BUG=v8:4377 > LOG=Y > R=adamk > > Committed: https://crrev.com/9edbc1f21eb1050cabbe3b8bc9aebf89ada7ebd7 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30314} TBR=adamk@chromium.org NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=v8:4377 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1309043004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30316}
-
littledan authored
The parser has special behavior with respect to the bindings of inner functions in sloppy mode which are not at the top level of scopes. This behavior should be turned off when the --harmony-sloppy-function flag is set, as lexical scoping rules are used instead. Previously, the incorrect flag --harmony-sloppy was used, resulting in a crashing bug. BUG=chromium:520029 LOG=Y R=adamk Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1303033003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30315}
-
- 21 Aug, 2015 34 commits
-
-
littledan authored
The ES2015 specification for switch statements 13.12.11 specifies that they get their own lexical scope. This patch introduces such a scope through a complex desugaring in terms of blocks, done so that Crankshaft does not have to be updated to support multiple constructs providing scopes. BUG=v8:4377 LOG=Y R=adamk Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1293283002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30314}
-
bradnelson authored
While the class Type objects the AstTyper generates should be allocated to zone memory, there's no particular reason the typer object itself needs to be. BUG=None TEST=None R=rossberg@chromium.org,titzer@chromium.org LOG=N Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1303843003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30313}
-
mstarzinger authored
R=titzer@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1310603002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30312}
-
binji authored
FutexEmulation::Wait can potentially block forever on a condition variable. We want to allow this to be interrupted (for a debugger, or to terminate the thread, for example). The previous implementation would periodically wake up the waiter to check for interrupts. This CL modifies the StackGuard so it wakes the blocked futex if the thread should be interrupted. BUG=chromium:497295 R=jarin@chromium.org LOG=n Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1230303005 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30311}
-
vogelheim authored
Revert of Concurrently unmap free pages. (patchset #4 id:60001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1303263002/ ) Reason for revert: Several tests on V8 Linux64 TSAN bot are broken, due to data races between allocation & GC. A bisect points to this CL, and the CL description sounds pertinent to the observed breakage. Original issue's description: > Concurrently unmap free pages. > > BUG= > > Committed: https://crrev.com/d1aeb45d96123d47023066b244c0f450fbe57d2d > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30306} TBR=mlippautz@chromium.org,hpayer@chromium.org NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1306213002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30310}
-
mstarzinger authored
R=titzer@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1309813002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30309}
-
mstarzinger authored
R=titzer@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1304053004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30308}
-
rmcilroy authored
Calls should have control and effect inputs, which were previously missing for RawMachineAssembler call operations. Add control and effect edges to graph()->start(). BUG=v8:4280 LOG=N Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1283193007 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30307}
-
hpayer authored
BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1303263002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30306}
-
yangguo authored
R=cbruni@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1309673003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30305}
-
mstarzinger authored
R=mlippautz@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1309733002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30304}
-
mlippautz authored
BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1301963002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30303}
-
Michael Hablich authored
BUG= TBR=vogelheim@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org NOTRY=true Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1304203002 . Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30302}
-
mlippautz authored
BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1293283003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30301}
-
mstarzinger authored
R=yangguo@chromium.org,hpayer@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1306053003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30300}
-
hpayer authored
BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1296713007 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30299}
-
wingo authored
BUG=v8:4211 LOG=Y R=rossberg@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1286383005 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30298}
-
chunyang.dai authored
port cd351559 (r30284). original commit message: BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1303223002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30297}
-
chunyang.dai authored
port fe432e1a (r30250). original commit message: BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1303973004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30296}
-
rossberg authored
This CL is a nightmare! For the utterly irrelevant edge case of a sloppy function with non-simple parameters and a call to direct eval, like here, let x = 1; function f(g = () => x) { var y eval("var x = 2") return g() + x // f() = 3 } we have to do all of the following, on top of the declaration block ("varblock") contexts we already introduce around the body: - Introduce the ability for varblock contexts to have both a ScopeInfo and an extension object (e.g., the body varblock in the example will contain both a static var y and a dynamic var x). No other scope needs that. Since there are no context slots left, a special new struct is introduced that pairs up scope info and extension object. - When declaring lookup slots in the runtime, this new struct is allocated in the case where an extension object has to be added to a block scope (at which point the block's extension slot still contains a plain ScopeInfo). - While at it, introduce some abstraction to access context extension slots in a more controlled manner, in order to keep special-casing to a minimum. - Make sure that even empty varblock contexts do not get optimised away when they contain a sloppy eval, so that they can host the potential extension object. - Extend dynamic search for declaration contexts (used by sloppy direct eval) to recognize varblock contexts. - In the parser, if a function has a sloppy direct eval, introduce an additional varblock scope around each non-simple (desugared) parameter, as required by the spec to contain possible dynamic var bindings. - In the pattern rewriter, add the ability to hoist the named variables the pattern declares to an outer scope. That is required because the actual destructuring has to be evaluated inside the protecting varblock scope, but the bindings that the desugaring introduces are in the outer scope. - ScopeInfos need to save the information whether a block is a varblock, to make sloppy eval calls work correctly that deserialise them as part of the scope chain. - Add the ability to materialize block scopes with extension objects in the debugger. Likewise, enable setting extension variables in block scopes via the debugger interface. - While at it, refactor and unify some respective code in the debugger. Sorry, this CL is large. I could try to split it up, but everything is rather entangled. @mstarzinger: Please review the changes to contexts. @yangguo: Please have a look at the debugger stuff. R=littledan@chromium.org, mstarzinger@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org BUG=v8:811,v8:2160 LOG=N Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1292753007 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30295}
-
rossberg authored
- Introduce a proper bit for SIMD primitive values. - Introduce constructors for individual SIMD types. These are currently just classes, which seems good enough for now, given that we always have exactly one global map per SIMD type. The only problem with using class types for SIMD is that a SIMD constant won't be a subtype of its specific type, only of the general SIMD type. But until we actually introduce SIMD constants into the compiler that shouldn't matter. R=jarin@chromium.org BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1303863002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30294}
-
chunyang.dai authored
port d0bacc61 (r30235). original commit message: BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1286123008 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30293}
-
chunyang.dai authored
port cbbaf9ea (r30224). original commit message: [turbofan] Unify referencing of stack slots Previously, it was not possible to specify StackSlotOperands for all slots in both the caller and callee stacks. Specifically, the region of the callee's stack including the saved return address, frame pointer, function pointer and context pointer could not be addressed by the register allocator/gap resolver. In preparation for better tail call support, which will use the gap resolver to reconcile outgoing parameters, this change makes it possible to address all slots on the stack, because slots in the previously inaccessible dead zone may become parameter slots for outgoing tail calls. All caller stack slots are accessible as they were before, with slot -1 corresponding to the last stack parameter. Stack slot indices >= 0 access the callee stack, with slot 0 corresponding to the callee's saved return address, 1 corresponding to the saved frame pointer, 2 corresponding to the current function context, 3 corresponding to the frame marker/JSFunction, and slots 4 and above corresponding to spill slots. The following changes were specifically needed: * Frame has been changed to explicitly manage three areas of the callee frame, the fixed header, the spill slot area, and the callee-saved register area. * Conversions from stack slot indices to fp offsets all now go through a common bottleneck: OptimizedFrame::StackSlotOffsetRelativeToFp * The generation of deoptimization translation tables has been changed to support the new stack slot indexing scheme. Crankshaft, which doesn't support the new slot numbering in its register allocator, must adapt the indexes when creating translation tables. * Callee-saved parameters are now kept below spill slots, not above, to support saving only the optimal set of used registers, which is only known after register allocation is finished and spill slots have been allocated. BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1293103003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30292}
-
mstarzinger authored
R=bmeurer@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1302293002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30291}
-
chunyang.dai authored
port 0492bb32 (r30203). original commit message: BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1306833002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30290}
-
chunyang.dai authored
port 00df60d1 (r30219). original commit message: Makes the following modifications to the interpreter builtins and InterpreterAssembler: - Adds an accumulator register and initializes it to undefined() - Adds a register file pointer register and use it instead of FramePointer to access registers - Modifies builtin to support functions with 0 regiters in the register file - Modifies builtin to Call rather than TailCall to first bytecode handler. BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1304593002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30289}
-
chunyang.dai authored
port f4c079d4 (r30107). This is the appendix of 458dfe3b943edb3238917edfe9e2dde326cd1adb which misses one modified file. original commit message: There's no need to have one InstanceType per SIMD primitive type (this will not scale long-term). Also reduce the amount of code duplication and make it more robust wrt adding new SIMD types. BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1304963003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30288}
-
mlippautz authored
BUG=chromium:520607 LOG=N Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1302273002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30287}
-
wingo authored
Not all parenthesized AssignmentExpressions whose components are valid binding patterns are valid arrow function formal parameters. In particular (a,b,c)() is not valid, and in general the existing code wasn't catching the tail productions of ConditionalExpression, BinaryExpression, PostfixExpression, LeftHandSideExpression, and MemberExpression. Thanks to Adrian Perez for the test case. BUG=v8:4211 LOG=Y R=rossberg@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1306583002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30286}
-
yangguo authored
We can use the script type to determine that instead. Script of type TYPE_NATIVE are considered builtins, TYPE_NORMAL are not. The only exception to this rule is the empty function, for which the script is TYPE_NATIVE (observable by the debugger), but should be stringified to "function () {}" instead of "function () { [native code] }". For this, I introduce a hide_source flag on the script object. We also use IsBuiltin and IsSubjectToDebugging interchangeably. For debugger, we now use the latter, hiding the detail that only non-builtins are debuggable. R=mstarzinger@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1292283004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30285}
-
mvstanton authored
BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1292173003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30284}
-
yangguo authored
R=mvstanton@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1300333003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30283}
-
mstarzinger authored
R=bmeurer@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1303873002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30282}
-
mlippautz authored
GC flags are now part of the {Heap} and should be respected by all sub-components. Also add a infrastructure to write tests accessing private methods. Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1301183002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30281}
-