Skip to content

V
V8
Switch branch/tag
  1. 27 Apr, 2021 3 commits
  3. 21 Apr, 2021 2 commits
  5. 20 Apr, 2021 3 commits
    • Stephen Belanger's avatar
      Reland "[api] JSFunction PromiseHook for v8::Context" · c0fceaa0
      Stephen Belanger authored 
      This is a reland of d5457f5f
after a speculative revert.

Additionally it fixes an issue with throwing promise hooks.

Original change's description:
> [api] JSFunction PromiseHook for v8::Context
>
> This will enable Node.js to get much better performance from async_hooks
> as currently PromiseHook delegates to C++ for the hook function and then
> Node.js delegates it right back to JavaScript, introducing several
> unnecessary barrier hops in code that gets called very, very frequently
> in modern, promise-heavy applications.
>
> This API mirrors the form of the original C++ function based PromiseHook
> API, however it is intentionally separate to allow it to use JSFunctions
> triggered within generated code to, as much as possible, avoid entering
> runtime functions entirely.
>
> Because PromiseHook has internal use also, beyond just the Node.js use,
> I have opted to leave the existing API intact and keep this separate to
> avoid conflicting with any possible behaviour expectations of other API
> users.
>
> The design ideas for this new API stemmed from discussion with some V8
> team members at a previous Node.js Diagnostics Summit hosted by Google
> in Munich, and the relevant documentation of the discussion can be found
> here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g8OrG5lMIUhRn1zbkutgY83MiTSMx-0NHDs8Bf-nXxM/edit#heading=h.w1bavzz80l1e
>
> A summary of the reasons for why this new design is important can be
> found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vtgoT4_kjgOr-Bl605HR2T6_SC-C8uWzYaOPDK5pmRo/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Bug: v8:11025
> Change-Id: I0b403b00c37d3020b5af07b654b860659d3a7697
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2759188
> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Anton Bikineev <bikineev@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73858}

Bug: v8:11025
Bug: chromium:1197475
Change-Id: I73a71e97d9c3dff89a2b092c3fe4adff81ede8ef
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2823917Reviewed-by: 's avatarMarja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarIgor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarAnton Bikineev <bikineev@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarCamillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#74071}
      c0fceaa0
    • Maya Lekova's avatar
      Reland "[fastcall] Add support for leaf interface type checks" · 5540fbfc
      Maya Lekova authored 
      This is a reland of 6124a534

It fixes a UAF issue in the d8 test by moving the test API object
constructor to PerIsolateData. It also fixes a crash in Chromium
caused by current usage of v8::ApiObject, which should be migrated
to v8::Value*.

Original change's description:
> [fastcall] Add support for leaf interface type checks
>
> This CL adds an IsTemplateForApiObject method to FunctionTemplate
> allowing the embedder to check whether a given API object was
> instantiated by this template without including parent templates
> in the search. It also replaces the v8::ApiObject in the fast API
> with a raw v8::Value pointer to allow use of standard C++ casts.
>
> Bug: chromium:1052746
> Change-Id: I0812ec8b4daaa5f5005aabf10b63e1e84e0b8f03
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2595310
> Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran  <gsathya@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73999}

Bug: chromium:1052746, chromium:1199900
Change-Id: I4b7f0c9e9152919dde4a1d0c48fbf5ac8c5b13d8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2835711Reviewed-by: 's avatarGeorg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarSathya Gunasekaran  <gsathya@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarCamillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#74064}
      5540fbfc
    • Sathya Gunasekaran's avatar
      Reland "[ic] Add a new MegaDOM IC" · fbd114bd
      Sathya Gunasekaran authored 
      This is a reland of c83c9590

Changes since revert: nothing, issue was crbug.com/v8/11666

Original change's description:
> [ic] Add a new MegaDOM IC
>
> This patch implements the MegaDOM IC setup and access. A new MegaDOM
> IC state indicates that we've seen only DOM accessors at this access
> site.
>
> This CL only adds support for DOM getters in LoadIC, other kinds of
> access will be added in follow on CLs.
>
> Still remaining TODO before shipping:
> 1. Have a mechanism to invalidate the protector
> 2. Have a mechanism to find the accessors that aren't overloaded
> 3. Use a new builtin to miss to runtime on access check failure
>
> Change-Id: Ie12efe5e9fa284f023043b996d61e7d74e710ee2
> Bug: v8:11321
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2618239
> Reviewed-by: Omer Katz <omerkatz@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran  <gsathya@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73733}

Bug: v8:11321
Change-Id: I2bec54465542b5b40c42adb6eb12b6ce72cce5bd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2794439Reviewed-by: 's avatarDan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarMythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarCamillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarOmer Katz <omerkatz@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarUlan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran  <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#74056}
      fbd114bd
  7. 16 Apr, 2021 4 commits
  9. 14 Apr, 2021 2 commits
  11. 13 Apr, 2021 1 commit
  13. 12 Apr, 2021 2 commits
  15. 08 Apr, 2021 4 commits
  17. 07 Apr, 2021 3 commits
  19. 06 Apr, 2021 2 commits
  21. 01 Apr, 2021 1 commit
    • Sara Tang's avatar
      [diagnostics] Enable ETW stack-walking events build flag · f0061332
      Sara Tang authored 
      Feedback from Microsoft partners indicates that it would be beneficial
to enable ETW stack-walking events by default.

This is difficult, because the --interpreted-frames-native-stack flag
comes with a significant perf degradation. Ideally, we would turn
this flag on dynamically, only when a ETW recorder is actively
triggering the provider. Unfortunately, the flag in its current state
cannot be enabled dynamically.

In light of this, we have decided to only flip the build flag.

Bug: v8:11043
Change-Id: Id883b9bcd635b41139450ab2d5c92511422525a3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2773792Reviewed-by: 's avatarCamillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sara Tang <sartang@microsoft.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73784}
      f0061332
  23. 31 Mar, 2021 2 commits
    • Maya Lekova's avatar
      Revert "[ic] Add a new MegaDOM IC" · 3f8aa89e
      Maya Lekova authored 
      This reverts commit c83c9590.

Reason for revert: Speculatively reverting for a failure on Arm GC stress bot - https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Arm%20GC%20Stress/b8851256837192083520/overview

Original change's description:
> [ic] Add a new MegaDOM IC
>
> This patch implements the MegaDOM IC setup and access. A new MegaDOM
> IC state indicates that we've seen only DOM accessors at this access
> site.
>
> This CL only adds support for DOM getters in LoadIC, other kinds of
> access will be added in follow on CLs.
>
> Still remaining TODO before shipping:
> 1. Have a mechanism to invalidate the protector
> 2. Have a mechanism to find the accessors that aren't overloaded
> 3. Use a new builtin to miss to runtime on access check failure
>
> Change-Id: Ie12efe5e9fa284f023043b996d61e7d74e710ee2
> Bug: v8:11321
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2618239
> Reviewed-by: Omer Katz <omerkatz@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran  <gsathya@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73733}

Bug: v8:11321
Change-Id: Ib6a55796f2a3c345d4923f9eaa215a6ff55ed15b
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2794437
Auto-Submit: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Rubber Stamper <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73734}
      3f8aa89e
    • Sathya Gunasekaran's avatar
      [ic] Add a new MegaDOM IC · c83c9590
      Sathya Gunasekaran authored 
      This patch implements the MegaDOM IC setup and access. A new MegaDOM
IC state indicates that we've seen only DOM accessors at this access
site.

This CL only adds support for DOM getters in LoadIC, other kinds of
access will be added in follow on CLs.

Still remaining TODO before shipping:
1. Have a mechanism to invalidate the protector
2. Have a mechanism to find the accessors that aren't overloaded
3. Use a new builtin to miss to runtime on access check failure

Change-Id: Ie12efe5e9fa284f023043b996d61e7d74e710ee2
Bug: v8:11321
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2618239Reviewed-by: 's avatarOmer Katz <omerkatz@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarCamillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarDan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarMythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran  <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73733}
      c83c9590
  25. 25 Mar, 2021 2 commits
  27. 23 Mar, 2021 2 commits
  29. 17 Mar, 2021 1 commit
  31. 16 Mar, 2021 3 commits
  33. 15 Mar, 2021 2 commits
  35. 12 Mar, 2021 1 commit