- 22 Jan, 2016 12 commits
-
-
ishell authored
When accessor getter callback is called the v8::PropertyCallbackInfo::ShouldThrowOnError() is always false, since according to ES6 there's no difference between strict and non-strict property loads. For the setter case the v8::PropertyCallbackInfo::ShouldThrowOnError() returns true if the property is set in strict context. Interceptors follow same idea: for getter, enumerator and query callbacks the v8::PropertyCallbackInfo::ShouldThrowOnError() is always false, and for setter and deleter callback the v8::PropertyCallbackInfo::ShouldThrowOnError() returns true in strict context. This CL also cleans up the CallApiGetterStub and removes bogus asserts from [arm] Push(reg1, reg2, ..., regN) that prevented from pushing a set of registers containing duplicates. BUG=v8:4267 LOG=Y Committed: https://crrev.com/1d3e837fcbbd9d9fd5e72dfe85dfd47c025f3c9f Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33438} Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1587073003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33461}
-
bmeurer authored
We already had hand-written optimized code for %_ToName in fullcodegen, but the optimizing compilers always went to the runtime for %_ToName, which is pretty bad for many of our builtins. So this CL moves the existing native code to a ToNameStub (similar to the existing ToStringStub), and uses the ToNameStub consistently in all compilers to actually implement %_ToName. Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1622493002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33460}
-
cbruni authored
Revert of [runtime] Do not use the enum-cache for non-prototype objects. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1612413003/ ) Reason for revert: let me quickly revert the revert, wut? Goal: my CL should not be in the tree! Original issue's description: > Reland of [runtime] Do not use the enum-cache for non-prototype objects. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1619803003/ ) > > Reason for revert: > the deopt issues have been taken care of by benedikt > > Original issue's description: > > Revert of [runtime] Do not use the enum-cache for non-prototype objects. (patchset #10 id:180001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1608523002/ ) > > > > Reason for revert: > > tanks for-in significantly > > > > Original issue's description: > > > [runtime] Do not use the enum-cache for keys retrieval. > > > > > > Currently we fail to properly handle shadowed properties. If the > > > receiver defines a non-enumerable property that reappears on the > > > prototype as enumerable it incorrectly shows up in [[Enumerate]]. > > > By extending the KeyAccumulator to track non-enumerable properties > > > we can now properly filter them out when seeing them further up in > > > the prototype-chain. > > > > > > BUG=v8:705 > > > LOG=y > > > > > > Committed: https://crrev.com/ed24dfe80d1da0827b8571839ee52c03ad09c9c7 > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33405} > > > > TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org > > # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. > > BUG=v8:705 > > LOG=n > > > > Committed: https://crrev.com/6e0573c6fff1c3041bab106d1197ab1b64aa9a6a > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33443} > > TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org > # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. > NOPRESUBMIT=true > NOTREECHECKS=true > NOTRY=true > BUG=v8:705 > > Committed: https://crrev.com/5569e270eda517b5ea74e3a7676b3230cbe2f7a9 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33458} TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=v8:705 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1614313003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33459}
-
cbruni authored
Reland of [runtime] Do not use the enum-cache for non-prototype objects. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1619803003/ ) Reason for revert: the deopt issues have been taken care of by benedikt Original issue's description: > Revert of [runtime] Do not use the enum-cache for non-prototype objects. (patchset #10 id:180001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1608523002/ ) > > Reason for revert: > tanks for-in significantly > > Original issue's description: > > [runtime] Do not use the enum-cache for keys retrieval. > > > > Currently we fail to properly handle shadowed properties. If the > > receiver defines a non-enumerable property that reappears on the > > prototype as enumerable it incorrectly shows up in [[Enumerate]]. > > By extending the KeyAccumulator to track non-enumerable properties > > we can now properly filter them out when seeing them further up in > > the prototype-chain. > > > > BUG=v8:705 > > LOG=y > > > > Committed: https://crrev.com/ed24dfe80d1da0827b8571839ee52c03ad09c9c7 > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33405} > > TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org > # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. > BUG=v8:705 > LOG=n > > Committed: https://crrev.com/6e0573c6fff1c3041bab106d1197ab1b64aa9a6a > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33443} TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=v8:705 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1612413003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33458}
-
ishell authored
NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1621523003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33457}
-
bmeurer authored
The internal index used to implement for-in can never leave the valid smi range, so there's no need to actually check for overflow in Crankshaft. In fact the overflow only triggered a false alert in the deopt fuzzer. R=jarin@chromium.org BUG=v8:3650 LOG=n Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1621623002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33456}
-
mtrofin authored
This simplifies correlating offsets with the output from --print-opt-code, which outputs offsets in decimal. We keep the hex output since branch instructions in the perf dump use hex labels. We just include the decimal offset along with the hex offset. BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1612403002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33455}
-
mtrofin authored
Revert "Revert of [turbofan] optimize spills in defered blocks (patchset #3 id:240001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1551013002/ )" This reverts commit 7f62e122. The regressions reported in the bug below appear to be bogus, and caused by chromium:579503 BUG=chromium:579900 LOG=N Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1612923003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33454}
-
bmeurer authored
R=jarin@chromium.org BUG=v8:3650 LOG=n Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1621583002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33453}
-
mtrofin authored
Show tick count, besides the percentage spent on an instruction. Aids perf investigations where we deal with stalls, for example. Percentage-wise, the execution appears distributed similarly, but the regression becomes more apparent in the tick counts. Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1607323003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33452}
-
v8-autoroll authored
Rolling v8/buildtools to cf8c4332f5c9d0da4b4782d7f0122df74a16819b Rolling v8/tools/clang to e47364ad9fb37e8255a7a5cdf7891781b3f8256e Rolling v8/tools/swarming_client to 0b908f18767c8304dc089454bc1c91755d21f1f5 TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,vogelheim@chromium.org,hablich@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1621563002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33451}
-
caitpotter88 authored
BUG=v8:4663 LOG=N TBR=hpayer@chromium.org R=ljharb@gmail.com, rossberg@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1581033002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33450}
-
- 21 Jan, 2016 28 commits
-
-
ofrobots authored
Revert of [profiler] Implement POC Sampling Heap Profiler (patchset #12 id:220001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1555553002/ ) Reason for revert: The random nature of the tests caused the following buildbot to fail: https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20gcc%204.8/builds/4724/steps/Check/logs/stdio Original issue's description: > [profiler] Implement POC Sampling Heap Profiler > > This implements a proof-of-concept sampling based heap profiler inspired by > tcmalloc's heap profiler [1] and Go's mprof/memprofile [2]. > > The basic idea is the sample allocations using a randomized Poisson process. At > any point in time we can cheaply request the set of live sample objects that > should be a representative sample of heap. Samples include stack-traces from the > allocation sites, making this an effective tool for memory leak debugging. > > Unlike AllocationTracking, this is intended to be cheap and usable online in > production. > > The proof-of-concept is only sampling new-space allocations at this point. > Support for sampling paged space and native allocations is anticipated in the > future. > > [1] http://goog-perftools.sourceforge.net/doc/heap_profiler.html > [2] http://blog.golang.org/profiling-go-programs > > Committed: https://crrev.com/e5a9947811db9c9e23557dbad27f8b8a349b3262 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33448} TBR=jochen@chromium.org,alph@chromium.org,hpayer@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1615173002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33449}
-
ofrobots authored
This implements a proof-of-concept sampling based heap profiler inspired by tcmalloc's heap profiler [1] and Go's mprof/memprofile [2]. The basic idea is the sample allocations using a randomized Poisson process. At any point in time we can cheaply request the set of live sample objects that should be a representative sample of heap. Samples include stack-traces from the allocation sites, making this an effective tool for memory leak debugging. Unlike AllocationTracking, this is intended to be cheap and usable online in production. The proof-of-concept is only sampling new-space allocations at this point. Support for sampling paged space and native allocations is anticipated in the future. [1] http://goog-perftools.sourceforge.net/doc/heap_profiler.html [2] http://blog.golang.org/profiling-go-programs Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1555553002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33448}
-
mbrandy authored
Port f48bf12f Original commit message: The PrepareId bailout location was used incorrectly in Crankshaft and, as it turns out, is not required anyway (once you do it right). Also there was some premature optimization going on with the CheckEnumCache (trying to load null from roots only once), plus we can be smarter about the null/undefined check anyway. The idea behind this changes is to prepare unification of the two different ForInPrepare implementations that we now have, with the end result being that we only use the new implementation that was recently added for the interpreter. R=bmeurer@chromium.org, joransiu@ca.ibm.com, jyan@ca.ibm.com, michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com BUG=v8:3650 LOG=n Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1619643004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33447}
-
adamk authored
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1601023005 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33446}
-
machenbach authored
BUG=v8:4696 LOG=N NOTRY=true TBR=rossberg, nickie Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1617803004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33445}
-
machenbach authored
Revert of Array length reduction should throw in strict mode if it can't delete an element. (patchset #7 id:220001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1587073003/ ) Reason for revert: [Sheriff] Breaks layout tests. Please fix upstream. https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8.fyi/builders/V8-Blink%20Linux%2064/builds/4077 Original issue's description: > Array length reduction should throw in strict mode if it can't delete an element. > > When accessor getter callback is called the v8::PropertyCallbackInfo::ShouldThrowOnError() is always false, since according to ES6 there's no difference between strict and non-strict property loads. For the setter case the v8::PropertyCallbackInfo::ShouldThrowOnError() returns true if the property is set in strict context. > > Interceptors follow same idea: for getter, enumerator and query callbacks the v8::PropertyCallbackInfo::ShouldThrowOnError() is always false, and for setter and deleter callback the v8::PropertyCallbackInfo::ShouldThrowOnError() returns true in strict context. > > This CL also cleans up the CallApiGetterStub and removes bogus asserts from [arm] Push(reg1, reg2, ..., regN) that prevented from pushing a set of registers containing duplicates. > > BUG=v8:4267 > LOG=Y > > Committed: https://crrev.com/1d3e837fcbbd9d9fd5e72dfe85dfd47c025f3c9f > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33438} TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,ishell@chromium.org # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=v8:4267 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1611313003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33444}
-
cbruni authored
Revert of [runtime] Do not use the enum-cache for non-prototype objects. (patchset #10 id:180001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1608523002/ ) Reason for revert: tanks for-in significantly Original issue's description: > [runtime] Do not use the enum-cache for keys retrieval. > > Currently we fail to properly handle shadowed properties. If the > receiver defines a non-enumerable property that reappears on the > prototype as enumerable it incorrectly shows up in [[Enumerate]]. > By extending the KeyAccumulator to track non-enumerable properties > we can now properly filter them out when seeing them further up in > the prototype-chain. > > BUG=v8:705 > LOG=y > > Committed: https://crrev.com/ed24dfe80d1da0827b8571839ee52c03ad09c9c7 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33405} TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. BUG=v8:705 LOG=n Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1619803003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33443}
-
titzer authored
Motivated by finding a bug in a larger module, this CL adds the ability to dump out a byte-by-byte, nested view of the decoded AST. This byte-by-byte output uses the opcode enum to make it readable, but is suitable for pasting into a byte[] in C or JS and thus making a regression test. Also fix a bug; the case of running out of registers for indirect calls. R=ahaas@chromium.org BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1616973004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33442}
-
nikolaos authored
ParseArguments already does the rewriting. R=rossberg@chromium.org BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1617733002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33441}
-
ahaas authored
R=titzer@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1614973002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33440}
-
bmeurer authored
There's no need to have HMapEnumLength as a dedicated instruction, as it can be expressed using a HLoadNamedField plus an HBitwiseAnd operation. R=jarin@chromium.org BUG=v8:3650 LOG=n Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1614943002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33439}
-
ishell authored
When accessor getter callback is called the v8::PropertyCallbackInfo::ShouldThrowOnError() is always false, since according to ES6 there's no difference between strict and non-strict property loads. For the setter case the v8::PropertyCallbackInfo::ShouldThrowOnError() returns true if the property is set in strict context. Interceptors follow same idea: for getter, enumerator and query callbacks the v8::PropertyCallbackInfo::ShouldThrowOnError() is always false, and for setter and deleter callback the v8::PropertyCallbackInfo::ShouldThrowOnError() returns true in strict context. This CL also cleans up the CallApiGetterStub and removes bogus asserts from [arm] Push(reg1, reg2, ..., regN) that prevented from pushing a set of registers containing duplicates. BUG=v8:4267 LOG=Y Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1587073003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33438}
-
yangguo authored
We divide character ranges into - BMP, matched normally. - non-BMP, matched as alternatives of surrogate pair ranges. - lone surrogates, matched with lookaround assertion that its indeed lone. R=erik.corry@gmail.com BUG=v8:2952 LOG=N Committed: https://crrev.com/ea820ad5fa282a323a86fe20e64f83ee67ba5f04 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33432} Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1578253005 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33437}
-
yangguo authored
These features are not used by devtools and consequently not exposed through the devtools protocol. They make the debugger unnecessarily complex. If we decide that we need this, we should implement this on a higher layer. R=bmeurer@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1607193003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33436}
-
mlippautz authored
Also restrict how many pages are swept during slow path allocation. BUG=chromium:524425 LOG=N Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1596343004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33435}
-
yangguo authored
Revert of [regexp] implement character classes for unicode regexps. (patchset #11 id:220001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1578253005/ ) Reason for revert: Compile failure on arm. https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Arm%20-%20debug%20builder/builds/7341/steps/compile/logs/stdio Original issue's description: > [regexp] implement character classes for unicode regexps. > > We divide character ranges into > - BMP, matched normally. > - non-BMP, matched as alternatives of surrogate pair ranges. > - lone surrogates, matched with lookaround assertion that its indeed lone. > > R=erik.corry@gmail.com > BUG=v8:2952 > LOG=N > > Committed: https://crrev.com/ea820ad5fa282a323a86fe20e64f83ee67ba5f04 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33432} TBR=littledan@chromium.org,erik.corry@gmail.com,erikcorry@google.com # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=v8:2952 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1618753002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33434}
-
nikolaos authored
It was not properly rewriting three cases: - [...[42]][0] - [...[42]].length - [...[42]] `foo` (which is a type error) R=rossberg@chromium.org BUG=v8:4696 LOG=N Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1617713002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33433}
-
yangguo authored
We divide character ranges into - BMP, matched normally. - non-BMP, matched as alternatives of surrogate pair ranges. - lone surrogates, matched with lookaround assertion that its indeed lone. R=erik.corry@gmail.com BUG=v8:2952 LOG=N Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1578253005 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33432}
-
jarin authored
Revert of [turbofan] optimize spills in defered blocks (patchset #3 id:240001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1551013002/ ) Reason for revert: Regresses lots of benchmarks: https://crbug.com/579900 Original issue's description: > [turbofan] optimize spills in defered blocks > > Up to now, for ranges spilled in deferred blocks, we would spill every > time a range would switch from using a register to spill slots. That can > be redundant, leading to avoidable code size cost. > > This change addresses this issue, by performing the spills as early as > possible. > > BUG= > > Committed: https://crrev.com/7c54dc33855b8ac31f26b309671f9b5481a74376 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33413} TBR=bmeurer@chromium.org,mtrofin@chromium.org # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1612013002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33431}
-
balazs.kilvady authored
BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1605093002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33430}
-
yangguo authored
A break location is considered muted if it has break points, but their conditions all evaluate to false. Aside from not triggering break events, debugger statements and exceptions are also ignored. R=verwaest@chromium.org BUG=chromium:429167 LOG=Y Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1610073002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33429}
-
zhengxing.li authored
port f48bf12f (r33426) original commit message: The PrepareId bailout location was used incorrectly in Crankshaft and, as it turns out, is not required anyway (once you do it right). Also there was some premature optimization going on with the CheckEnumCache (trying to load null from roots only once), plus we can be smarter about the null/undefined check anyway. The idea behind this changes is to prepare unification of the two different ForInPrepare implementations that we now have, with the end result being that we only use the new implementation that was recently added for the interpreter. BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1611113002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33428}
-
bmeurer authored
When a slow mode for-in loop is compiled with Crankshaft we unconditionally deoptimize when we hit an object with a usable enum-cache (which is currently hidden by another CL), and obviously we don't learn anything from that. R=jarin@chromium.org BUG=v8:3650 LOG=n Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1611933003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33427}
-
bmeurer authored
The PrepareId bailout location was used incorrectly in Crankshaft and, as it turns out, is not required anyway (once you do it right). Also there was some premature optimization going on with the CheckEnumCache (trying to load null from roots only once), plus we can be smarter about the null/undefined check anyway. The idea behind this changes is to prepare unification of the two different ForInPrepare implementations that we now have, with the end result being that we only use the new implementation that was recently added for the interpreter. R=jarin@chromium.org BUG=v8:3650 LOG=n Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1618613002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33426}
-
zhengxing.li authored
port 0b3066b8 (r33414) original commit message: This implements a first prototype of stack unwinding for interpreted frames. The unwinding machinery performs a range-based lookup in the given handler table and potentially continues dispatching at the handler offset. Note that this does not yet correctly restore the context to the correct value when the handler is being entered. BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1616613002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33425}
-
zhengxing.li authored
port 2dde677f (r33386) original commit message: This is the ia32/x64 version of https://codereview.chromium.org/873703002, which fixed the same problem on arm/arm64. BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1606203003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33424}
-
zhengxing.li authored
port d1d01964 (r33410) original commit message: The motivation for this is that CompilationInfo really shouldn't explicitly know anything about CodeStubs. This is evident in the TurboFan stubs pipeline, which only needs to pass down information about Code::Flags to the code generator and not any of the CallInterfaceDescriptor silliness that Hydrogen has to push around, since TF has the Linkage class that encapsulates everything that is needed for the stub ABI. So, instead of threading CodeStub machinery through the TF stub pipeline, it is now removed from CompilationInfo and replaced by only the explicit bits needed both by the Crankshaft and TF pipelines in code generation. BUG= Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1611793003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33423}
-
v8-autoroll authored
Rolling v8/build/gyp to aa0301be5a241c2972f90ce2a08097b63c916390 TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,vogelheim@chromium.org,hablich@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1612883002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33422}
-