1. 17 Feb, 2021 1 commit
    • Seth Brenith's avatar
      Reland "[interpreter] Short Star bytecode" · 7be64db4
      Seth Brenith authored
      This is a reland of cf93071c
      
      Original change's description:
      > [interpreter] Short Star bytecode
      >
      > Design doc:
      > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g_NExMT78II_KnIYNa9MvyPYIj23qAiFUEsyemY5KRk/edit
      >
      > This change adds 16 new interpreter opcodes, kStar0 through kStar15, so
      > that we can use a single byte to represent the common operation of
      > storing to a low-numbered register. This generally reduces the quantity
      > of bytecode generated on web sites by 8-9%.
      >
      > In order to not degrade speed, a couple of other changes are required:
      >
      > The existing lookahead logic to check for Star after certain other
      > bytecode handlers is updated to check for these new short Star codes
      > instead. Furthermore, that lookahead logic is updated to contain its own
      > copy of the dispatch jump rather than merging control flow with the
      > lookahead-failed case, to improve branch prediction.
      >
      > A bunch of constants use bytecode size in bytes as a proxy for the size
      > or complexity of a function, and are adjusted downward proportionally to
      > the decrease in generated bytecode size.
      >
      > Other small drive-by fix: update generate-bytecode-expectations to emit
      > \n instead of \r\n on Windows.
      >
      > Change-Id: I6307c2b0f5794a3a1088bb0fb94f6e1615441ed5
      > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2641180
      > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
      > Commit-Queue: Seth Brenith <seth.brenith@microsoft.com>
      > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72773}
      
      Change-Id: I1afb670c25694498b3989de615858f984a8c7f6f
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2698057
      Commit-Queue: Seth Brenith <seth.brenith@microsoft.com>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarRoss McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarMythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72821}
      7be64db4
  2. 12 Feb, 2021 1 commit
  3. 29 Jan, 2021 1 commit
  4. 28 Jan, 2021 1 commit
    • Marja Hölttä's avatar
      Revert "Reland [super] Store home object in Context instead of JSFunction" · 12f8ac47
      Marja Hölttä authored
      This reverts commit f6450b97.
      
      Reason for revert: ClusterFuzz bugs
      
      Original change's description:
      > Reland [super] Store home object in Context instead of JSFunction
      >
      > 1) Computed property keys (esp functions in them) shouldn't be inside
      > the object literal scope.
      >
      > 2) I was using an imprecise "maybe uses super" and storing it to
      > preparse data. This won't fly, since it pollutes sister scopes and
      > leads to confusion wrt whether an object literal needs a home object
      > or not. Made it precise (mostly cancelling changes in the original CL).
      >
      > 3) PreParser::NewSuperPropertyReference was creating a VariableProxy for
      > this_function (which made it used) -> inconsistent scopes between
      > parsing and preparsing.
      >
      > 4) MultipleEntryBlockContextScope was messing up the accumulator
      >
      > Original: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2563275
      >
      > This saves memory (the home object doesn't need to be stored for each
      > method, but only once per class) and hopefully makes the home object
      > a constant in the optimized code.
      >
      > Detailed documentation of the changes:
      > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZVXcoQdf9IdMsnRI9iyUjyq9NDoEyx9nA3XqMgwflMs/edit?usp=sharing
      >
      > Bug: v8:9237, chromium:1167918, chromium:1167981, chromium:1167988, chromium:1168055
      > Change-Id: I4f53f18cc18762c33e53d8c802909b42f1c33538
      > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2637220
      > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
      > Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
      > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72169}
      
      TBR=marja@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org
      
      # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
      
      Bug: v8:9237
      Bug: chromium:1167918
      Bug: chromium:1167981
      Bug: chromium:1167988
      Bug: chromium:1168055
      Bug: chromium:1171195
      Bug: chromium:1171600
      Change-Id: I15209f50c3fc8acf385a23f031ebb64139e2f519
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2653158Reviewed-by: 's avatarMarja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
      Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72391}
      12f8ac47
  5. 27 Jan, 2021 1 commit
    • Mythri A's avatar
      Add option to allocate feedback vector based on bytecode size · aa4ee8d5
      Mythri A authored
      Currently, feedback vectors are allocated on a fixed budget of 1024.
      In some cases it might be beneficial to allocate feedback vectors based
      on invocation count rather than fixed budget. For example, if we have
      a large function that is only run once. This cl adds an option to
      use interrupt budget based on the bytecode size. It kind of mimics
      invocation count. We would allocate feedback vectors early when we
      have loops which is also required.
      
      This flag is turned off by default. In followup cl, we will enable it
      and if the memory / performance tradeoff is good we might make it
      default.
      
      Change-Id: I9f7231119b5fd65fb3268e665e2e315fb2625e1b
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2584960Reviewed-by: 's avatarRoss McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarToon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
      Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72371}
      aa4ee8d5
  6. 19 Jan, 2021 2 commits
  7. 18 Jan, 2021 1 commit
  8. 07 Jan, 2021 1 commit
  9. 18 Nov, 2020 2 commits
  10. 12 Nov, 2020 2 commits
  11. 10 Nov, 2020 2 commits
  12. 09 Nov, 2020 2 commits
  13. 05 Nov, 2020 2 commits
  14. 22 Oct, 2020 1 commit
  15. 20 Oct, 2020 1 commit
    • Marja Hölttä's avatar
      [super ic] Fix receiver type · 3773e46e
      Marja Hölttä authored
      With non-super loads (receiver == lookup_start_object), we don't hit
      the code in AccessorAssembler::GenericPropertyLoad calling
      CSA::TryGetOwnProperty if the receiver (the lookup_start_object) is a
      SMI.
      
      But with super property loads, if we set up lookup_start_object the
      right way, we will hit this code.
      
      The code was assuming receiver is a HeapObject, which is too
      restrictive. The receiver is only used for the accessor call, so
      it's ok to make the type more generic.
      
      Bug: v8:9237, chromium:1139786
      Change-Id: I3167ccfb54a49ac1c401040a6f02fc1f3b98d9d1
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2484366Reviewed-by: 's avatarIgor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
      Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70647}
      3773e46e
  16. 06 Oct, 2020 1 commit
  17. 24 Sep, 2020 3 commits
  18. 22 Sep, 2020 1 commit
  19. 08 Sep, 2020 1 commit
  20. 18 Aug, 2020 2 commits
  21. 03 Aug, 2020 1 commit
  22. 24 Jun, 2020 1 commit
  23. 22 Jun, 2020 1 commit
  24. 09 Jun, 2020 1 commit
  25. 28 Apr, 2020 2 commits
  26. 24 Apr, 2020 3 commits
    • Shu-yu Guo's avatar
      Allow Proxy constructor to take revoked Proxies as targets and handlers · ce43feb5
      Shu-yu Guo authored
      Normative spec change: https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1814
      
      Bug: v8:10382
      Change-Id: Ib17ece9f0c8f75702c828b5336e75cab5d173e5e
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2163876
      Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarMarja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67376}
      ce43feb5
    • Timothy Gu's avatar
      Reland "[builtins] Clean up the use of class_name / ES5 [[Class]]" · 1aa51b49
      Timothy Gu authored
      This is a reland of 29c1eab9
      
      Original change's description:
      > [builtins] Clean up the use of class_name / ES5 [[Class]]
      >
      > Before ES2015, the ES spec had a [[Class]] internal slot for all
      > objects, which Object.prototype.toString() would use to figure the
      > returned string. Post-ES2015, the [[Class]] slot was removed in spec for
      > all objects, with the @@toStringTag well-known symbol the proper way to
      > change Object.prototype.toString() output.
      >
      > At the time, spec-identical handling without the use of [[Class]] was
      > implemented in V8 for all objects other than API objects, where issues
      > with the Web IDL spec [1] prevented Blink, and hence V8, to totally
      > migrate to @@toStringTag. However, since 2016 [2] Blink has been setting
      > @@toStringTag on API class prototypes to manage the
      > Object.prototype.toString() output, so the legacy [[Class]] handling in
      > V8 has not been necessary for the past couple of years.
      >
      > This CL removes the remaining legacy [[Class]] handling in
      > Object.prototype.toString(), JSReceiver::class_name(), and
      > GetConstructorName(). However, it does not remove the class_name field
      > in FunctionTemplateInfo, as it is still used for the `name` property of
      > created functions.
      >
      > This CL also cleans up other places in the codebase that still reference
      > [[Class]].
      >
      > This change should have minimal impact on web-compatibility. For the
      > change to be observable, a script must do one of the following:
      >
      > 1. delete APIConstructor.prototype[Symbol.toStringTag];
      > 2. Object.setPrototypeOf(apiObject, somethingElse);
      >
      > Before this CL, these changes will not change the apiObject.toString()
      > output. But after this CL, they will make apiObject.toString() show
      > "[object Object]" (in the first case) or the @@toStringTag of the other
      > prototype (in the latter case).
      >
      > However, both are deemed unlikely. @@toStringTag is not well-known
      > feature of JavaScript, nor does it get tampered much on API
      > constructors. In the second case, setting the prototype of an API object
      > would effectly render the object useless, as all its methods (including
      > property getters/setters) would no longer be accessible.
      >
      > Currently, @@toStringTag-based API object branding is not yet
      > implemented by other browsers. This V8 bug in particular has been an
      > impediment to standardizing toString behavior. Fixing this bug will
      > unblock [3] and lead to a better Web IDL spec, and better toString()
      > compatibility for all.
      >
      > [1]: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28244
      > [2]: https://crrev.com/909c0d7d5a53c8526ded351683c65ea7d17531d4
      > [3]: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/357
      >
      > Bug: chromium:793406
      > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux-rel
      > Change-Id: Iceded24e37afa2646ec385d5018909f55b177f93
      > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2146996
      > Commit-Queue: Timothy Gu <timothygu@chromium.org>
      > Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
      > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67327}
      
      Bug: chromium:793406
      Change-Id: Ia5d97bd4e1c44cadc6f18a17ffc9d06b038cf8f1
      Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux-rel
      Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_blink_rel
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2163881
      Auto-Submit: Timothy Gu <timothygu@chromium.org>
      Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarToon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67361}
      1aa51b49
    • Bill Budge's avatar
      Revert "[builtins] Clean up the use of class_name / ES5 [[Class]]" · 213016d6
      Bill Budge authored
      This reverts commit 29c1eab9.
      
      Reason for revert: Causes Blink test failures:
      https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Blink%20Linux/4222
      
      Original change's description:
      > [builtins] Clean up the use of class_name / ES5 [[Class]]
      > 
      > Before ES2015, the ES spec had a [[Class]] internal slot for all
      > objects, which Object.prototype.toString() would use to figure the
      > returned string. Post-ES2015, the [[Class]] slot was removed in spec for
      > all objects, with the @@toStringTag well-known symbol the proper way to
      > change Object.prototype.toString() output.
      > 
      > At the time, spec-identical handling without the use of [[Class]] was
      > implemented in V8 for all objects other than API objects, where issues
      > with the Web IDL spec [1] prevented Blink, and hence V8, to totally
      > migrate to @@toStringTag. However, since 2016 [2] Blink has been setting
      > @@toStringTag on API class prototypes to manage the
      > Object.prototype.toString() output, so the legacy [[Class]] handling in
      > V8 has not been necessary for the past couple of years.
      > 
      > This CL removes the remaining legacy [[Class]] handling in
      > Object.prototype.toString(), JSReceiver::class_name(), and
      > GetConstructorName(). However, it does not remove the class_name field
      > in FunctionTemplateInfo, as it is still used for the `name` property of
      > created functions.
      > 
      > This CL also cleans up other places in the codebase that still reference
      > [[Class]].
      > 
      > This change should have minimal impact on web-compatibility. For the
      > change to be observable, a script must do one of the following:
      > 
      > 1. delete APIConstructor.prototype[Symbol.toStringTag];
      > 2. Object.setPrototypeOf(apiObject, somethingElse);
      > 
      > Before this CL, these changes will not change the apiObject.toString()
      > output. But after this CL, they will make apiObject.toString() show
      > "[object Object]" (in the first case) or the @@toStringTag of the other
      > prototype (in the latter case).
      > 
      > However, both are deemed unlikely. @@toStringTag is not well-known
      > feature of JavaScript, nor does it get tampered much on API
      > constructors. In the second case, setting the prototype of an API object
      > would effectly render the object useless, as all its methods (including
      > property getters/setters) would no longer be accessible.
      > 
      > Currently, @@toStringTag-based API object branding is not yet
      > implemented by other browsers. This V8 bug in particular has been an
      > impediment to standardizing toString behavior. Fixing this bug will
      > unblock [3] and lead to a better Web IDL spec, and better toString()
      > compatibility for all.
      > 
      > [1]: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28244
      > [2]: https://crrev.com/909c0d7d5a53c8526ded351683c65ea7d17531d4
      > [3]: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/357
      > 
      > Bug: chromium:793406
      > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux-rel
      > Change-Id: Iceded24e37afa2646ec385d5018909f55b177f93
      > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2146996
      > Commit-Queue: Timothy Gu <timothygu@chromium.org>
      > Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
      > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67327}
      
      TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,timothygu@chromium.org
      
      Change-Id: I678d2ffc1064b1d1ddb62024cc23c6c41b216ef4
      No-Presubmit: true
      No-Tree-Checks: true
      No-Try: true
      Bug: chromium:793406
      Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux-rel
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2163956Reviewed-by: 's avatarBill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
      Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67349}
      213016d6
  27. 23 Apr, 2020 1 commit
    • Timothy Gu's avatar
      [builtins] Clean up the use of class_name / ES5 [[Class]] · 29c1eab9
      Timothy Gu authored
      Before ES2015, the ES spec had a [[Class]] internal slot for all
      objects, which Object.prototype.toString() would use to figure the
      returned string. Post-ES2015, the [[Class]] slot was removed in spec for
      all objects, with the @@toStringTag well-known symbol the proper way to
      change Object.prototype.toString() output.
      
      At the time, spec-identical handling without the use of [[Class]] was
      implemented in V8 for all objects other than API objects, where issues
      with the Web IDL spec [1] prevented Blink, and hence V8, to totally
      migrate to @@toStringTag. However, since 2016 [2] Blink has been setting
      @@toStringTag on API class prototypes to manage the
      Object.prototype.toString() output, so the legacy [[Class]] handling in
      V8 has not been necessary for the past couple of years.
      
      This CL removes the remaining legacy [[Class]] handling in
      Object.prototype.toString(), JSReceiver::class_name(), and
      GetConstructorName(). However, it does not remove the class_name field
      in FunctionTemplateInfo, as it is still used for the `name` property of
      created functions.
      
      This CL also cleans up other places in the codebase that still reference
      [[Class]].
      
      This change should have minimal impact on web-compatibility. For the
      change to be observable, a script must do one of the following:
      
      1. delete APIConstructor.prototype[Symbol.toStringTag];
      2. Object.setPrototypeOf(apiObject, somethingElse);
      
      Before this CL, these changes will not change the apiObject.toString()
      output. But after this CL, they will make apiObject.toString() show
      "[object Object]" (in the first case) or the @@toStringTag of the other
      prototype (in the latter case).
      
      However, both are deemed unlikely. @@toStringTag is not well-known
      feature of JavaScript, nor does it get tampered much on API
      constructors. In the second case, setting the prototype of an API object
      would effectly render the object useless, as all its methods (including
      property getters/setters) would no longer be accessible.
      
      Currently, @@toStringTag-based API object branding is not yet
      implemented by other browsers. This V8 bug in particular has been an
      impediment to standardizing toString behavior. Fixing this bug will
      unblock [3] and lead to a better Web IDL spec, and better toString()
      compatibility for all.
      
      [1]: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28244
      [2]: https://crrev.com/909c0d7d5a53c8526ded351683c65ea7d17531d4
      [3]: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/357
      
      Bug: chromium:793406
      Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux-rel
      Change-Id: Iceded24e37afa2646ec385d5018909f55b177f93
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2146996
      Commit-Queue: Timothy Gu <timothygu@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarToon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67327}
      29c1eab9
  28. 20 Apr, 2020 1 commit