Skip to content

V
V8
Switch branch/tag
  1. 10 Oct, 2019 1 commit
    • Joyee Cheung's avatar
      [class] implement static private methods · 4e8c6281
      Joyee Cheung authored 
      This patch refactors the declaration and allocation of the class variable, and
implements static private methods:


- The class variable is declared in the class scope with an explicit
  reference through class_scope->class_variable(). Anonymous classes
  whose class variable may be accessed transitively through static
  private method access use the dot string as the class name. Whether
  the class variable is allocated depending on whether it is used.
  Other references of the class variable in the ClassLiteral AST node
  and the ClassInfo structure are removed in favor of the reference
  through the class scope.
- Previously the class variable was always (stack- or context-)
  allocated if the class is named. Now if the class variable is only
  referenced by name, it's stack allocated. If it's used transitively
  by access to static private methods, or may be used through eval,
  it's context allocated. Therefore we now use 1 less context slots
  in the class context if it's a named class without anyone referencing
  it by name in inner scopes.
- Explicit access to static private methods or potential access to
  static private methods through eval results in forced context
  allocation of the class variables. In those cases, we save its index
  in context locals in the ScopeInfo and deserialize it later, so that
  we can check that the receiver of static private methods is the class
  constructor at run time. This flag is recorded as
  HasSavedClassVariableIndexField in the scope info.
- Classes that need the class variable to be saved due to
  access to static private methods now save a
  ShouldSaveClassVariableIndexField in the preparse data so that the
  bits on the variables can be updated during a reparse. In the case
  of anonymous classes that need the class variables to be saved,
  we also re-declare the class variable after the reparse since
  the inner functions are skipped and we need to rely on the preparse
  data flags to remember declaring it.

Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rgGRw5RdzaRrM-GrIMhsn-DLULtADV2dmIdh_iIZxlc/edit

Bug: v8:8330
Change-Id: Idd07803f47614e97ad202de3b7faa9f71105eac5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1781011
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarMythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarToon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64219}
      4e8c6281
  3. 11 Sep, 2019 1 commit
  5. 02 Sep, 2019 1 commit
  7. 30 Aug, 2019 1 commit
  9. 23 Aug, 2019 1 commit
    • Dan Elphick's avatar
      [compiler] Skip creating unneeded objects for lazy source positions · 735f3a68
      Dan Elphick authored 
      This changes Compiler::CollectSourcePositions to skip finalization of
the BytecodeArray, constant table, handler table, ScopeInfos as well as
internalization of Ast values since only the source position table is
used and the others will be collected soon after by the GC.

It will also now avoid recompiling inner functions that would otherwise
be eagerly compiled.

BytecodeArrayWriter::ToBytecodeArray has been changed to never populate
the source_position_table.

Bug: v8:8510
Change-Id: I2db2f2da6b48fde11f17a20d017c1a54c0a34fc2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1763538
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarRoss McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63365}
      735f3a68
  11. 21 Aug, 2019 1 commit
  13. 20 Aug, 2019 1 commit
  15. 07 Aug, 2019 1 commit
  17. 30 Jul, 2019 1 commit
    • Joyee Cheung's avatar
      [class] parse private accessors · a6dd7f1c
      Joyee Cheung authored 
      This patch adds:

- VariableMode::kPrivateMethod
- VariableMode::kPrivateSetterOnly
- VariableMode::kPrivateGetterOnly
- VariableMode::kPrivateGetterAndSetter

And replace the previous RequiresBrandCheckFlag by inferring
whether the brand check is required from these VariableModes.
It is then possible to check duplicate non-complementary
accessors in the parsers and throw early errors, and allow
complementary accessors to be associated with the same
private name variable.

This patch also adds the following AssignType:

- PRIVATE_METHOD
- PRIVATE_GETTER_ONLY
- PRIVATE_SETTER_ONLY
- PRIVATE_GETTER_AND_SETTER

corresponding to the new VariableModes so that it's possible
to generate specialized code for different type of
private accessor declarations.

Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10W4begYfs7lmldSqBoQBBt_BKamgT8igqxF9u50RGrI/edit

Bug: v8:8330
Change-Id: I0fb61b1be248630d1eadd74fb16d7d64a421f4c4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1695204
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarRoss McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62988}
      a6dd7f1c
  19. 08 Jul, 2019 1 commit
  21. 19 Jun, 2019 1 commit
  23. 18 Jun, 2019 1 commit
  25. 23 May, 2019 1 commit
  27. 13 May, 2019 1 commit
  29. 10 May, 2019 1 commit
    • Ross McIlroy's avatar
      Revert "[class] implement private method declarations" · bf07d790
      Ross McIlroy authored 
      This reverts commit b9191bd3.

Reason for revert: Clusterfuzz bugs
BUG=chromium:961507,chromium:961508

Original change's description:
> [class] implement private method declarations
>
> This patch implements the declarations of private methods, the access
> of private methods would be left to a future patch.
> When a private methods declaration is encountered, we now:
>
> - Create a brand symbol during class evaluation and store it in the
>   context.
> - Create the closures for the private methods
> - Load the brand from the context and store it in the instance in the
>   constructor.
>
> Design: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-Ql6HOIH2U_8YjWkwK2rTfywwb7b3Qe8d3jkz72KwA/edit#
>
> Bug: v8:8330
> Change-Id: I2d695cbdc8a7367ddc7620d627b318f779d36150
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1568708
> Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61387}

TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,gsathya@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,joyee@igalia.com

Change-Id: I429bbe8af9f94598de132814aa2c3ab9fa69b986
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:8330
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1605730
Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarRoss McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61406}
      bf07d790
  31. 09 May, 2019 1 commit
  33. 11 Mar, 2019 1 commit
  35. 08 Feb, 2019 1 commit
  37. 06 Feb, 2019 1 commit
    • Toon Verwaest's avatar
      [parser] Handle 'this' with a special ThisExpression rather than VariableProxy · 3f2b5017
      Toon Verwaest authored 
      "this" is a very common expression. By using a single ThisExpression object
we can both avoid allocating many unnecessary VariableProxies and specialize
the resolution of this since we know where it's declared up-front. This also
avoids having to special-case "this" reference handling in the paths that would
behave differently for "this" than for regular references; e.g., with-scopes.

The tricky pieces are due to DebugEvaluate and this/super() used as default
parameters of arrow functions. In the former case we replace the WITH_SCOPE
with FUNCTION_SCOPE so that we make sure that "this" is intercepted, and still
rely on regular dynamic variable lookup. Arrow functions are dealt with by
marking "this" use in ArrowHeadParsingScopes. If the parenthesized expression
ends up being an arrow function, we force context allocate on the outer scope
(and mark "has_this_reference" on the FUNCTION_SCOPE so DebugEvaluate in the
arrow function can expose "this").

The CL also removes the now unused ThisFunction AST node.

Change-Id: I0ca38ab92ff58c2f731e07db2fbe91df901681ef
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1448313Reviewed-by: 's avatarLeszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarYang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarRoss McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59393}
      3f2b5017
  39. 28 Jan, 2019 1 commit
  41. 15 Jan, 2019 1 commit
  43. 14 Jan, 2019 1 commit
  45. 10 Jan, 2019 1 commit
  47. 09 Jan, 2019 1 commit
    • Leszek Swirski's avatar
      [parser] Don't desugar destructuring declarations. · 5e725a2b
      Leszek Swirski authored 
      Emit a single destructuring assignment for destructuring declarations,
which can be desugared by the bytecode generator. This allows us to
remove destructuring desugaring from the parser (specifically, the
pattern rewriter) entirely.

The pattern "rewriter" is now only responsible for walking the
destructuring pattern to declare variables, mark them assigned, and
potentially rewrite scopes for the edge case of parameters with a sloppy
eval.

Note that since the rewriter is no longer rewriting, we have to flip the
VariableProxy copying logic for var re-lookup, so that we now pass the
new VariableProxy to the variable declaration and leave the original
unresolved (rather than passing the original through and rewriting to a
new unresolved VariableProxy).

This change does have some effect on breakpoint locations, due to some
of the available information changing between the parser and bytecode
generator, however the new locations appear to be more consistent
between assignments and declarations.

Change-Id: I3a58dd0a387d2bfb8e5e9e22dde0acc5f440cb82
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1382462
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarAdam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarRoss McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarYang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarToon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#58670}
      5e725a2b
  49. 03 Jan, 2019 1 commit
  51. 08 Nov, 2018 1 commit
  53. 06 Nov, 2018 1 commit
  55. 24 Oct, 2018 1 commit
  57. 16 Oct, 2018 1 commit
    • Sathya Gunasekaran's avatar
      [class] Fix class field name initialization · bc324dbd
      Sathya Gunasekaran authored 
      Previously when class names were computed and set as part of
StoreDataPropertyInLiteral calls, it was observable to static fields
as these static fields are initialized right after the classes were
constructed but before the class names were installed.
This caused the name property to be undefined for this case.

Instead, this patch always forces the creation of a name property on
the class constructor when static class fields are used. This patch
does kill the class boilerplate optimization, but currently all static
class fields are installed using a runtime call to CreateDataProperty
so this isn't any worse when using static class fields.

In the future, this can be optimized away by storing the name on the
boilerplate.

There is spec discussion here:
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/issues/85

There isn't a resolution yet, there's still discussion about whether
to have the name be undefined always for static class field
initializers. But, I don't think that's useful as it would always kill
our boilerplate optimization (like this patch does ..., but without the
future optimization potential).

Bug: v8:5367
Change-Id: I14afdf7ece3f2d9fa3c659d2c0bc3806e0b17abb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1281002Reviewed-by: 's avatarMythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarDaniel Ehrenberg <littledan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarIgor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#56686}
      bc324dbd
  59. 05 Sep, 2018 1 commit
    • Hai Dang's avatar
      Reland "[interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads." · 5f8a4272
      Hai Dang authored 
      This is a reland of 1c48d52b.

It turned out that IterableToList doesn't always behave according to
the ES operation with the same name. Specifically, it allows holey arrays
to take its fast path, which produces an output array with holes where
actually "undefined" elements should appear.

This CL changes the version of IterableToList that is used for spreads
(IterableToListWithSymbolLookup) such that holey arrays take the slow path.
It also includes tests for such situations.

Original change's description:
> [interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads.
>
> This CL improves the performance of creating [...a, b] or [...a].
> If the array literal has a leading spread, this CL emits the bytecode
> [CreateArrayFromIterable] to create the literal. CreateArrayFromIterable
> is implemented by [IterableToListDefault] builtin to create the initial
> array for the leading spread. IterableToListDefault has a fast path to
> clone efficiently if the spread is an actual array.
>
> The bytecode generated is now shorter. Bytecode generation is refactored
> into to BuildCreateArrayLiteral, which allows VisitCallSuper to benefit
> from this optimization also.
> For now, turbofan also lowers the bytecode to the builtin.
>
> The idiomatic use of [...a] to clone the array a now performs better
> than a simple for-loop, but still does not match the performance of slice.
>
> Bug: v8:7980
>
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
> Change-Id: Ibde659c82d3c7aa1b1777a3d2f6426ac8cc15e35
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1181024
> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55520}

Bug: v8:7980
Change-Id: I0b5603a12d2b588327658bf0a9b214bd0f22e237
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1201882
Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarGeorg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarRoss McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarJakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55639}
      5f8a4272
  61. 31 Aug, 2018 1 commit
    • Georg Neis's avatar
      Revert "[interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads." · ef569028
      Georg Neis authored 
      This reverts commit 1c48d52b.

Reason for revert: Clusterfuzz found something.

Original change's description:
> [interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads.
> 
> This CL improves the performance of creating [...a, b] or [...a].
> If the array literal has a leading spread, this CL emits the bytecode
> [CreateArrayFromIterable] to create the literal. CreateArrayFromIterable
> is implemented by [IterableToListDefault] builtin to create the initial
> array for the leading spread. IterableToListDefault has a fast path to
> clone efficiently if the spread is an actual array.
> 
> The bytecode generated is now shorter. Bytecode generation is refactored
> into to BuildCreateArrayLiteral, which allows VisitCallSuper to benefit
> from this optimization also.
> For now, turbofan also lowers the bytecode to the builtin.
> 
> The idiomatic use of [...a] to clone the array a now performs better
> than a simple for-loop, but still does not match the performance of slice.
> 
> Bug: v8:7980
> 
> Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
> Change-Id: Ibde659c82d3c7aa1b1777a3d2f6426ac8cc15e35
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1181024
> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55520}

TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,sigurds@chromium.org,gsathya@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,dhai@google.com

Change-Id: I1c86ddcc24274da9f5a8dd3d8bf8d869cbb55cb6
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:7980
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1199303Reviewed-by: 's avatarGeorg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55544}
      ef569028
  63. 30 Aug, 2018 1 commit
    • Hai Dang's avatar
      [interpreter] Add bytecode for leading array spreads. · 1c48d52b
      Hai Dang authored 
      This CL improves the performance of creating [...a, b] or [...a].
If the array literal has a leading spread, this CL emits the bytecode
[CreateArrayFromIterable] to create the literal. CreateArrayFromIterable
is implemented by [IterableToListDefault] builtin to create the initial
array for the leading spread. IterableToListDefault has a fast path to
clone efficiently if the spread is an actual array.

The bytecode generated is now shorter. Bytecode generation is refactored
into to BuildCreateArrayLiteral, which allows VisitCallSuper to benefit
from this optimization also.
For now, turbofan also lowers the bytecode to the builtin.

The idiomatic use of [...a] to clone the array a now performs better
than a simple for-loop, but still does not match the performance of slice.

Bug: v8:7980

Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng
Change-Id: Ibde659c82d3c7aa1b1777a3d2f6426ac8cc15e35
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1181024Reviewed-by: 's avatarRoss McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarSigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarJakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarGeorg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hai Dang <dhai@google.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55520}
      1c48d52b
  65. 28 Aug, 2018 1 commit
  67. 10 Aug, 2018 1 commit
  69. 09 Aug, 2018 1 commit
  71. 08 Aug, 2018 1 commit
  73. 07 Aug, 2018 1 commit
  75. 04 Jul, 2018 1 commit
  77. 22 Jun, 2018 1 commit
  79. 14 May, 2018 1 commit