-
Milad Fa authored
This test produces different outputs when compiled with gcc. It is currently failing on PPC using gcc-8, it also has failed on riscv: https://github.com/riscv/v8/issues/174 I have also tested it with gcc-10 on x64 and it still fails. The line numbers seem to be different when compiled with gcc instead of clang. As a workaround we can force the usage of macros in one line to assure outputs are the same on either compiler. Change-Id: I36a05d0dc62dfe66bdfcf177422836cb231284b2 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2844666Reviewed-by: Anton Bikineev <bikineev@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Milad Fa <mfarazma@redhat.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#74162}
896f9c23
Name |
Last commit
|
Last update |
---|---|---|
.. | ||
benchmarks | ||
cctest | ||
common | ||
debugger | ||
debugging | ||
fuzzer | ||
fuzzilli | ||
inspector | ||
intl | ||
js-perf-test | ||
memory | ||
message | ||
mjsunit | ||
mkgrokdump | ||
mozilla | ||
test262 | ||
torque | ||
unittests | ||
wasm-api-tests | ||
wasm-js | ||
wasm-spec-tests | ||
webkit | ||
BUILD.gn | ||
OWNERS |