- 16 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
jkummerow authored
This is in preparation for linking the former only into mksnapshot. Just shuffling code around, no changes in functionality. BUG=v8:6055 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2752143004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43858}
-
- 09 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
jkummerow authored
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2734323004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43695}
-
- 23 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Marja Hölttä authored
BUG=v8:5294 Change-Id: If45f25aae8de526027b7851cb4efe0ccf4a7c4b1 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/444226 Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43388}
-
- 16 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
jwolfe authored
For functions declared in source code, the .toString() representation will be an excerpt of the source code. * For functions declared with the "function" keyword, the excerpt starts at the "function" or "async" keyword and ends at the final "}". The previous behavior would start the excerpt at the "(" of the parameter list, and prepend a canonical `"function " + name` or similar, which would discard comments and formatting surrounding the function's name. Anonymous functions declared as function expressions no longer get the name "anonymous" in their toString representation. * For methods, the excerpt starts at the "get", "set", "*" (for generator methods), or property name, whichever comes first. Previously, the toString representation for methods would use a canonical prefix before the "(" of the parameter list. Note that any "static" keyword is omitted. * For arrow functions and class declarations, the excerpt is unchanged. For functions created with the Function, GeneratorFunction, or AsyncFunction constructors: * The string separating the parameter text and body text is now "\n) {\n", where previously it was "\n/*``*/) {\n" or ") {\n". * At one point, newline normalization was required by the spec here, but that was removed from the spec, and so this CL does not do it. Included in this CL is a fix for CreateDynamicFunction parsing. ')' and '`' characters in the parameter string are no longer disallowed, and Function("a=function(", "}){") is no longer allowed. BUG=v8:4958, v8:4230 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2156303002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43262}
-
- 06 Dec, 2016 1 commit
-
-
ishell authored
BUG= Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2558443002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41511}
-
- 01 Dec, 2016 1 commit
-
-
ishell authored
Bonus: fixed a couple of places where 32-bit comparison was used. BUG= Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2543873003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41417}
-
- 16 Nov, 2016 2 commits
-
-
jkummerow authored
This is in preparation for introducing more specialized CodeStubAssembler subclasses. The state object can be handed around, while the Assembler instances are temporary-scoped. BUG=v8:5628 Original review: https://codereview.chromium.org/2498073002/ Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2502293002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41028}
-
machenbach authored
Revert of [refactoring] Split CodeAssemblerState out of CodeAssembler (patchset #8 id:140001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2498073002/ ) Reason for revert: https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20shared doesn't want to compile. Missing export annotation? Original issue's description: > [refactoring] Split CodeAssemblerState out of CodeAssembler > > This is in preparation for introducing more specialized > CodeStubAssembler subclasses. The state object can be handed > around, while the Assembler instances are temporary-scoped. > > BUG=v8:5628 TBR=ishell@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org,jkummerow@chromium.org # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=v8:5628 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2504913002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41018}
-
- 15 Nov, 2016 1 commit
-
-
jkummerow authored
This is in preparation for introducing more specialized CodeStubAssembler subclasses. The state object can be handed around, while the Assembler instances are temporary-scoped. BUG=v8:5628 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2498073002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41015}
-
- 14 Oct, 2016 1 commit
-
-
neis authored
It's always JSFunction. R=bmeurer@chromium.org BUG= Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2422573002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40301}
-
- 12 Oct, 2016 1 commit
-
-
epertoso authored
WordIsSmi, by itself, is not that descriptive, as it just ands a word with the heap object tag. With this change, the MachineGraphVerifier can check that the input to TaggedIsSmi actually has a tagged representation. This CL also introduces a few bitcast operators in the Smi* macros in the CodeStubAssembler. R=bmeurer@chromium.org BUG= Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2407303002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#40209}
-
- 07 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
bmeurer authored
Migrate the isNaN, isFinite, Number.isFinite, Number.isInteger, Number.isSafeInteger and Number.isNaN predicates to TurboFan builtins and make them optimizable (for certain input types) in JavaScript callees being optimized by TurboFan. That means both the baseline and the optimized version is now always at maximum, consistent performance. Especially TurboFan suffered from poor baseline (and optimized) performance because it cannot play the same weird tricks that Crankshaft plays for %_IsSmi. This also adds a bunch of new tests to properly cover the use of the Harmony predicates in optimized code. R=franzih@chromium.org BUG=v8:5049,v8:5267 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2313073002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39242}
-
- 03 Aug, 2016 1 commit
-
-
jochen authored
Similarly to how we check whether the entered context has access to the target context when invoking the function constructor, we should check the involved contexts before invoking eval(). I forgot to add this in the initial CL that adds the check for the function constructor. Move the code to a common location, and use it for the GlobalEval builtin as well. BUG=chromium:541703 R=verwaest@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2199343002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38277}
-
- 20 Jul, 2016 2 commits
-
-
jgruber authored
R=yangguo@chromium.org BUG= Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2163933002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37909}
-
jgruber authored
R=yangguo@chromium.org BUG=v8:5197 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2165593002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37885}
-