positives, but I've restructured the code to be more explicit.

Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/159192

git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@2521 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00

This issue was raised by Brett Wilson while reviewing my changelist for readability. Craig Silverstein (one of C++ SG maintainers) confirmed that we should declare one namespace per line. Our way of namespaces closing seems not violating style guides (there is no clear agreement on it), so I left it intact.

Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/115756


git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@2038 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00

TBR=kasperl

Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/13210

git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@928 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00

- Do not keep growing the zone segment size exponentially. By putting
  an upper limit on the segment size we limit the requirements for
  contiguous memory allocation.

Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/12984

git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@926 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00

scope, leading to zone exhaustion.  Added assertion that a zone scope
exists on zone allocation.


git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@898 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00

stack limit and that the zone allocation limit hasn't been met.


git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@879 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00

Added presubmit step to check copyright.



git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@242 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00

unsafe calls to Zone::DeleteAll() from parser and use ZoneScopes
instead.


git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@54 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00

git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@2 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00