1. 10 Feb, 2020 1 commit
  2. 14 Dec, 2017 1 commit
  3. 19 Oct, 2017 1 commit
  4. 12 Oct, 2017 1 commit
  5. 12 Sep, 2017 1 commit
  6. 27 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  7. 25 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  8. 17 Jul, 2017 1 commit
    • Leszek Swirski's avatar
      Revert "[runtime] Move profiler ticks from SFI to feedback vector" · 14c5c4fd
      Leszek Swirski authored
      This reverts commit a2fcdc7c.
      
      Reason for revert: Large regressions in RCS (https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=740126)
      
      Original change's description:
      > [runtime] Move profiler ticks from SFI to feedback vector
      > 
      > Instead of counting profiler ticks on the shared function info (which is
      > shared between native contexts), count them on the feedback vector
      > (which is not). This allows us to continue pushing optimization
      > decisions off the SFI, onto the feedback vector.
      > 
      > Note that a side-effect of this is that ICs don't have to walk the stack
      > to reset profiler ticks, as they can access the feedback vector directly
      > from their feedback nexus.
      > 
      > Change-Id: I232ae9e759fca75cd89d393148a4ff42caa2646f
      > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/544888
      > Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
      > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
      > Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
      > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46411}
      
      TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,ishell@chromium.org
      
      # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
      
      Change-Id: Id587e4172e300c420f93c49744a2a0e66696edf8
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/574227
      Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarLeszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46702}
      14c5c4fd
  9. 14 Jul, 2017 1 commit
    • Alexey Kozyatinskiy's avatar
      [inspector] improve return position of explicit return in non-async function · 08965860
      Alexey Kozyatinskiy authored
      Goal of this CL: explicit return from non-async function has position after
      return expression as return position (will unblock [1]).
      
      BytecodeArrayBuilder has SetStatementPosition and SetExpressionPosition methods.
      If one of these methods is called then next generated bytecode will get passed
      position. It's general treatment for most cases.
      Unfortunately it doesn't work for Returns:
      - debugger requires source positions exactly on kReturn bytecode in stepping
        implementation,
      - BytecodeGenerator::BuildReturn and BytecodeGenerator::BuildAsyncReturn
        generates more then one bytecode and general solution will put return position
        on first generated bytecode,
      - it's not easy to split BuildReturn function into two parts to allow something
        like following in BytecodeGenerator::VisitReturnStatement since generated
        bytecodes are actually controlled by execution_control().
      ..->BuildReturnPrologue();
      ..->SetReturnPosition(stmt);
      ..->Return();
      
      In this CL we pass ReturnStatement through ExecutionControl and use it for
      position when we emit return bytecode right here.
      
      So this CL only will improve return position for returns inside of non-async
      functions, I'll address async functions later.
      
      [1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/543161/
      
      Change-Id: Iede512c120b00c209990bf50c20e7d23dc0d65db
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/560738
      Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarAdam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarMichael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarRoss McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarJakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46687}
      08965860
  10. 05 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  11. 10 May, 2017 1 commit
  12. 08 May, 2017 1 commit
    • Ross McIlroy's avatar
      Revert "Reland: [TypeFeedbackVector] Store optimized code in the vector" · fd749344
      Ross McIlroy authored
      This reverts commit 662aa425.
      
      Reason for revert: Crashing on Canary
      BUG=chromium:718891
      
      Original change's description:
      > Reland: [TypeFeedbackVector] Store optimized code in the vector
      > 
      > Since the feedback vector is itself a native context structure, why
      > not store optimized code for a function in there rather than in
      > a map from native context to code? This allows us to get rid of
      > the optimized code map in the SharedFunctionInfo, saving a pointer,
      > and making lookup of any optimized code quicker.
      > 
      > Original patch by Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org>
      > 
      > BUG=v8:6246
      > TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org
      > 
      > Change-Id: Ic83e4011148164ef080c63215a0c77f1dfb7f327
      > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/494487
      > Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
      > Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
      > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45084}
      
      TBR=ulan@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org,jarin@chromium.org
      # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
      BUG=v8:6246
      
      Change-Id: Idab648d6fe260862c2a0e35366df19dcecf13a82
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/498633Reviewed-by: 's avatarRoss McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
      Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45174}
      fd749344
  13. 04 May, 2017 1 commit
    • Ross McIlroy's avatar
      Reland: [TypeFeedbackVector] Store optimized code in the vector · 662aa425
      Ross McIlroy authored
      Since the feedback vector is itself a native context structure, why
      not store optimized code for a function in there rather than in
      a map from native context to code? This allows us to get rid of
      the optimized code map in the SharedFunctionInfo, saving a pointer,
      and making lookup of any optimized code quicker.
      
      Original patch by Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org>
      
      BUG=v8:6246
      TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org
      
      Change-Id: Ic83e4011148164ef080c63215a0c77f1dfb7f327
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/494487Reviewed-by: 's avatarJaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
      Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45084}
      662aa425
  14. 02 May, 2017 2 commits
  15. 06 Apr, 2017 1 commit
    • bmeurer's avatar
      [turbofan] Collect and use type feedback on ToNumber. · dd7ce93c
      bmeurer authored
      Make Ignition collect BinaryOperationFeedback on ToNumber, using the
      shared type feedback slot with the following Inc/Dec bytecode, and use
      this feedback in TurboFan to turn the ToNumber(x) operation into a
      SpeculativeNumberMultiply(x,1) with the feedback hint.
      
      R=jarin@chromium.org, mstarzinger@chromium.org, rmcilroy@chromium.org
      BUG=v8:6214,v8:5267
      
      Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2804813003
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44440}
      dd7ce93c
  16. 16 Nov, 2016 1 commit
  17. 08 Nov, 2016 1 commit
  18. 04 Oct, 2016 1 commit
  19. 14 Sep, 2016 1 commit
    • bmeurer's avatar
      [turbofan] Collect invocation counts and compute relative call frequencies. · c7d7ca36
      bmeurer authored
      Add a notion of "invocation count" to the baseline compilers, which
      increment a special slot in the TypeFeedbackVector for each invocation
      of a given function (the optimized code doesn't currently collect this
      information).
      
      Use this invocation count to relativize the call counts on the call
      sites within the function, so that the inlining heuristic has a view
      of relative importance of a call site rather than some absolute numbers
      with unclear meaning for the current function. Also apply the call site
      frequency as a factor to all frequencies in the inlinee by passing this
      to the graph builders so that the importance of a call site in an
      inlinee is relative to the topmost optimized function.
      
      Note that all functions that neither have literals nor need type
      feedback slots will share a single invocation count cell in the
      canonical empty type feedback vector, so their invocation count is
      meaningless, but that doesn't matter since we only use the invocation
      count to relativize call counts within the function, which we only have
      if we have at least one type feedback vector (the CallIC slot).
      
      See the design document for additional details on this change:
      https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VoYBhpDhJC4VlqMXCKvae-8IGuheBGxy32EOgC2LnT8
      
      BUG=v8:5267,v8:5372
      R=mvstanton@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org,mstarzinger@chromium.org
      
      Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2337123003
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39410}
      c7d7ca36
  20. 06 Sep, 2016 1 commit
    • leszeks's avatar
      [Interpreter] Remove constant pool type in tests · b28b7e13
      leszeks authored
      For historical reasons, the interpreter's bytecode expectations tests
      required a type for the constant pool. This had two disadvantages:
      
       1. Strings and numbers were not visible in mixed pools, and
       2. Mismatches of pool types (e.g. when rebaselining) would cause parser
          errors
      
      This removes the pool types, making everything 'mixed', but appending
      the values to string and number valued constants. Specifying a pool type
      in the *.golden header now prints a warning (for backwards compatibility).
      
      BUG=v8:5350
      
      Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2310103002
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39216}
      b28b7e13
  21. 08 Aug, 2016 1 commit
  22. 22 Jul, 2016 1 commit
  23. 27 Jun, 2016 1 commit
  24. 11 May, 2016 1 commit
  25. 22 Apr, 2016 1 commit
  26. 25 Feb, 2016 1 commit
    • ssanfilippo's avatar
      [Interpreter] Refactor bytecode generator test suite. · 6ae03059
      ssanfilippo authored
      Bytecode expectations have been moved to external (.golden) files,
      one per test. Each test in the suite builds a representation of the
      the compiled bytecode using BytecodeExpectationsPrinter. The output is
      then compared to the golden file. If the comparision fails, a textual
      diff can be used to identify the discrepancies.
      
      Only the test snippets are left in the cc file, which also allows to
      make it more compact and meaningful. Leaving the snippets in the cc
      file was a deliberate choice to allow keeping the "truth" about the
      tests in the cc file, which will rarely change, as opposed to golden
      files.
      
      Golden files can be generated and kept up to date using
      generate-bytecode-expectations, which also means that the test suite
      can be batch updated whenever the bytecode or golden format changes.
      
      The golden format has been slightly amended (no more comments about
      `void*`, add size of the bytecode array) following the consideration
      made while converting the tests.
      
      There is also a fix: BytecodeExpectationsPrinter::top_level_ was left
      uninitialized, leading to undefined behaviour.
      
      BUG=v8:4280
      LOG=N
      
      Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1717293002
      
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34285}
      6ae03059