- 10 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Joyee Cheung authored
This patch implements https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/pull/269 and makes sure we always throw TypeError when there is invalid private name access in computed property keys. Before this patch, private name variables of private fields and methods are initialized together with computed property keys in the order they are declared. Accessing undefined private names in the computed property keys thus fail silently. After this patch, we initialize the private name variables of private fields before we initialize the computed property keys, so that invalid access to private fields in the computed keys can be checked in the IC. We now also initialize the brand early, so that invalid access to private methods or accessors in the computed keys throw TypeError during brand checks - and since these accesses are guarded by brand checks, we can create the private methods and accessors after the class is defined, and merge the home object setting with the creation of the closures. Bug: v8:8330, v8:9611 Change-Id: I01363f7befac6cf9dd28ec229b99a99102bcf012 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1846571 Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com> Reviewed-by:
Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64225}
-
- 19 Jun, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Leszek Swirski authored
A class's fields can appear twice in the class AST, via the properties array and the synthetised initializer method. This means that the reindexer can end up visiting the same function literal twice, since the T in AST is no longer a T but rather a DAG. Now, we special case the class visitor in the reindexer to avoid these double visits where appropriate. We know what kinds of fields can be double visisted, so we don't need a visited set, but we now also have one for debug builds to verify that each function is visited exactly once. Bug: chromium:974627 Change-Id: Ib531becc6e3f3c73f420b5fb49790fe4a2022d65 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1667003Reviewed-by:
Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62282}
-
- 23 May, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Yang Guo authored
TBR=bmeurer@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org Bug: v8:9247 Change-Id: I8d14d0192ea8c705f8274e8e61a162531826edb6 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1624220Reviewed-by:
Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61769}
-
- 14 Sep, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Florian Sattler authored
Fixing clang-tidy warning. Bug: v8:8015 Change-Id: If9a66df529dc5870f6d5146d9a83d22367ffdc59 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1224114Reviewed-by:
Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Florian Sattler <sattlerf@google.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55883}
-
- 09 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
marja authored
Downside: this adds all kinds of weird includes in the .cc files. (See design doc linked in the bug.) BUG=v8:5402 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2622503002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42140}
-
- 28 Nov, 2016 1 commit
-
-
jochen authored
They're supposed to be stable across several parse passes, so we'll also store them in the associated SharedFunctionInfos To achieve this, the PreParser and Parser need to generated the same number of FunctionLiterals. To achieve this, we teach the PreParser about desuggaring of class literals. For regular functions, the function IDs are assigned in the order they occur in the source. For arrow functions, however, we only know that it's an arrow function after parsing the parameter list, and so the ID assigned to the arrow function is larger than the IDs assigned to functions defined in the parameter list. This implies that we have to reset the function ID counter to before the parameter list when re-parsing an arrow function. To be able to do this, we store the number of function literals found in the parameter list of arrow functions as well. BUG=v8:5589 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2481163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#41309}
-