1. 20 Apr, 2021 1 commit
    • Sathya Gunasekaran's avatar
      Reland "[ic] Add a new MegaDOM IC" · fbd114bd
      Sathya Gunasekaran authored
      This is a reland of c83c9590
      
      Changes since revert: nothing, issue was crbug.com/v8/11666
      
      Original change's description:
      > [ic] Add a new MegaDOM IC
      >
      > This patch implements the MegaDOM IC setup and access. A new MegaDOM
      > IC state indicates that we've seen only DOM accessors at this access
      > site.
      >
      > This CL only adds support for DOM getters in LoadIC, other kinds of
      > access will be added in follow on CLs.
      >
      > Still remaining TODO before shipping:
      > 1. Have a mechanism to invalidate the protector
      > 2. Have a mechanism to find the accessors that aren't overloaded
      > 3. Use a new builtin to miss to runtime on access check failure
      >
      > Change-Id: Ie12efe5e9fa284f023043b996d61e7d74e710ee2
      > Bug: v8:11321
      > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2618239
      > Reviewed-by: Omer Katz <omerkatz@chromium.org>
      > Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
      > Reviewed-by: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
      > Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
      > Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran  <gsathya@chromium.org>
      > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73733}
      
      Bug: v8:11321
      Change-Id: I2bec54465542b5b40c42adb6eb12b6ce72cce5bd
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2794439Reviewed-by: 's avatarDan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarMythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarCamillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarOmer Katz <omerkatz@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarUlan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
      Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran  <gsathya@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#74056}
      fbd114bd
  2. 31 Mar, 2021 2 commits
    • Maya Lekova's avatar
      Revert "[ic] Add a new MegaDOM IC" · 3f8aa89e
      Maya Lekova authored
      This reverts commit c83c9590.
      
      Reason for revert: Speculatively reverting for a failure on Arm GC stress bot - https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Arm%20GC%20Stress/b8851256837192083520/overview
      
      Original change's description:
      > [ic] Add a new MegaDOM IC
      >
      > This patch implements the MegaDOM IC setup and access. A new MegaDOM
      > IC state indicates that we've seen only DOM accessors at this access
      > site.
      >
      > This CL only adds support for DOM getters in LoadIC, other kinds of
      > access will be added in follow on CLs.
      >
      > Still remaining TODO before shipping:
      > 1. Have a mechanism to invalidate the protector
      > 2. Have a mechanism to find the accessors that aren't overloaded
      > 3. Use a new builtin to miss to runtime on access check failure
      >
      > Change-Id: Ie12efe5e9fa284f023043b996d61e7d74e710ee2
      > Bug: v8:11321
      > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2618239
      > Reviewed-by: Omer Katz <omerkatz@chromium.org>
      > Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
      > Reviewed-by: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
      > Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
      > Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran  <gsathya@chromium.org>
      > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73733}
      
      Bug: v8:11321
      Change-Id: Ib6a55796f2a3c345d4923f9eaa215a6ff55ed15b
      No-Presubmit: true
      No-Tree-Checks: true
      No-Try: true
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2794437
      Auto-Submit: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
      Commit-Queue: Rubber Stamper <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
      Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73734}
      3f8aa89e
    • Sathya Gunasekaran's avatar
      [ic] Add a new MegaDOM IC · c83c9590
      Sathya Gunasekaran authored
      This patch implements the MegaDOM IC setup and access. A new MegaDOM
      IC state indicates that we've seen only DOM accessors at this access
      site.
      
      This CL only adds support for DOM getters in LoadIC, other kinds of
      access will be added in follow on CLs.
      
      Still remaining TODO before shipping:
      1. Have a mechanism to invalidate the protector
      2. Have a mechanism to find the accessors that aren't overloaded
      3. Use a new builtin to miss to runtime on access check failure
      
      Change-Id: Ie12efe5e9fa284f023043b996d61e7d74e710ee2
      Bug: v8:11321
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2618239Reviewed-by: 's avatarOmer Katz <omerkatz@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarCamillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarDan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarMythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
      Commit-Queue: Sathya Gunasekaran  <gsathya@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#73733}
      c83c9590
  3. 12 Feb, 2021 1 commit
    • Benedikt Meurer's avatar
      [stack-traces] Simplify and speedup stack trace collection. · eed0d27c
      Benedikt Meurer authored
      Following up on https://crrev.com/c/2689185, this CL significantly
      simplifies the whole implementation of the stack trace capturing.
      
      Before this CL, capturing any stack trace (for the purpose of the API or
      Error.stack) would roughly work like this:
      
        1. The CaptureStackTrace() function uses the StackFrameIterator to
           walk the system stack. For each native frame it uses the
           FrameSummary abstraction to get all (including potentially inlined)
           frames. For each of those it appends a record consisting of six
           elements to a FrameArray (this holds pointers to the actual
           closures and receivers).
        2. Afterwards the FrameArray is shrinked to the required size, and a
           new FixedArray is allocated, and initialized with new
           StackTraceFrame objects where each holds a reference to the
           FrameArray, the index of the frame, and an initially uninitialized
           StackFrameInfo reference. This new FixedArray is then returned from
           CaptureStackTrace() and either stored on a message object or
           provided to the API as v8::StackTrace.
      
      The new approach removes a lot of the machinery in between and directly
      creates a FixedArray of StackFrameInfo objects in CaptureStackTrace().
      These StackFrameInfo objects are directly exposed as v8::StackFrame on
      the public API, and they hold the six fields that were previously stored
      flat in the FrameArray. This not only avoids a lot of copying around of
      data and creation of temporary objects and handles, but most importantly
      unifies and simplifies the stack frame function inside StackFrameInfo,
      so you no longer need to wonder which function / object might be
      responsible for a certain API.
      
      There's still a lot of room for improvement. In particular we currently
      don't cache the source position for a given StackFrameInfo (or
      globally), but rather recompute it every time. This is still very fast,
      significantly faster than the previous approach.
      
      There are some notable (potentially user visible) changes:
      
        - The CallSite#GetPosition() method now consistently returns the
          Wasm module relative bytecode offset for all Wasm frames (previously
          it'd return the function relative bytecode offset for non-asm.js
          Wasm frames).
        - The column and line numbers returned from StackFrameInfo methods are
          consistently 1-based now, instead of sometimes being 0-based (Wasm)
          and sometimes being 1-based (JS and asm.js Wasm). The only
          potentially noticable difference is that for
          CallSite#GetLineNumber() no longer returns 0 for Wasm frames, but
          that was wrong and useless anyways.
        - CallSite#GetThis() would sometimes return the_hole, another bug
          flushed out by this CL.
      
      The CL also contains some other not noteworthy drive-by-cleanups.
      
      Fixed: chromium:1057211
      Bug: chromium:1077657, chromium:1069425, v8:8742
      Bug: chromium:1127391, chromium:1098530, chromium:981541
      Change-Id: Iff12f6838a4d99080db8dd96bccc14440affc5a5
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2689183
      Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarYang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarSimon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarJakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72694}
      eed0d27c
  4. 11 Feb, 2021 1 commit
  5. 09 Feb, 2021 1 commit
  6. 20 Jan, 2021 1 commit
    • Seth Brenith's avatar
      [torque] Begin porting ScopeInfo to Torque · ecaac329
      Seth Brenith authored
      This change adds Torque field definitions for ScopeInfo and begins to
      use the Torque-generated accessors in some places. It does not change
      the in-memory layout of ScopeInfo.
      
      Torque compiler changes:
      
      - Fix an issue where the parser created constexpr types for classes
        based on the class name rather than the `generates` clause. This meant
        that generated accessors referred to the imaginary type HashTable
        rather than the real C++ type FixedArray.
      - Don't pass Isolate* through the generated runtime functions that
        implement Torque macros. Maybe we'll need it eventually, but we don't
        right now and it complicates a lot of things.
      - Don't emit `kSomeFieldOffset` if some_field has an unknown offset.
        Instead, emit a member function `SomeFieldOffset()` which fetches the
        slice for some_field and returns its offset.
      - Emit an `AllocatedSize()` member function for classes which have
        complex length expressions. It fetches the slice for the last field
        and performs the multiply&add to compute the total object size.
      - Emit field accessors for fields with complex length expressions, using
        the new offset functions.
      - Fix a few minor bugs where Torque can write uncompilable code.
      
      With this change, most code still treats ScopeInfo like a FixedArray, so
      I would like to follow up with some additional changes:
      
      1. Generate a GC visitor for ScopeInfo and use it
      2. Generate accessors for struct-typed fields (indexed or otherwise),
         and use them
      3. Get rid of the FixedArray-style get and set accessors; use
         TaggedField::load and similar instead
      4. Inherit from HeapObject rather than FixedArrayBase to remove the
         unnecessary `length` field
      
      After that, there will only be one ugly part left: initialization. I
      think it's possible to generate a factory function that takes a bunch of
      iterator parameters and returns a fully-formed, verifiably correct
      ScopeInfo instance, but doing so is more complicated than the four
      mostly-mechanical changes listed above.
      
      Bug: v8:7793
      Change-Id: I55fcfe9189e4d1613c68d49e378da5dc02597b36
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2357758Reviewed-by: 's avatarToon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarPeter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarDominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarTobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
      Commit-Queue: Seth Brenith <seth.brenith@microsoft.com>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#72187}
      ecaac329
  7. 03 Nov, 2020 1 commit
  8. 28 Oct, 2020 1 commit
    • Tobias Tebbi's avatar
      [torque] generate C++ class definitions per Torque file · 03f60296
      Tobias Tebbi authored
      This CL splits the class definitions per .tq file, to realize the
      following relationship:
      A class defined in src/objects/foo.tq has a C++ definition in
      src/objects/foo.h. Torque then generates:
      
      - torque-generated/src/objects/foo-tq.inc
        An include file (no proper header) to be included in src/objects/foo.h
        containing the Torque-generated C++ class definition.
      
      - torque-generated/src/objects/foo-tq-inl.inc
        An include file (no proper header) to be included in
        src/objects/foo-inl.h containing inline function definitions.
      
      - torque-generated/src/objects/foo-tq.cc
        A source file including src/objects/foo-inl.h that contains non-inline
        function definitions.
      
      Advantages of this approach:
      - Avoid big monolithic headers and preserve the work that went into
        splitting objects.h
      - Moving a definition to Torque keeps everything in the same place
        from a C++ viewpoint, including a fully Torque-generated C++ class
        definition.
      - The Torque-generated include files do not need to be independent
        headers, necessary includes or forward declarations can just be added
        to the headers that include them.
      
      Drive-by changes:
      A bunch of definitions and files had to be moved or created to realize
      a consistent 1:1 relationship between .tq files and C++ headers.
      
      
      Bug: v8:7793
      TBR: hpayer@chromium.org
      Change-Id: I239a89a16d0bc856a8669d7c92aeafe24a7c7663
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2470571
      Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarNico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarSeth Brenith <seth.brenith@microsoft.com>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70853}
      03f60296