Skip to content

V
V8
Switch branch/tag
  1. 24 Sep, 2019 2 commits
  3. 20 Sep, 2019 1 commit
  5. 16 Sep, 2019 1 commit
  7. 13 Sep, 2019 1 commit
  9. 12 Sep, 2019 1 commit
  11. 11 Sep, 2019 1 commit
  13. 10 Sep, 2019 1 commit
  15. 06 Sep, 2019 1 commit
  17. 05 Sep, 2019 2 commits
  19. 03 Sep, 2019 1 commit
    • Simon Zünd's avatar
      Reset DeclarationScope::function_ variable after pre-parsing · 70dd77c7
      Simon Zünd authored 
      "--print-scopes" uses the {function_} variable to print the function
name and locals of a function scope. In case of a pre-parsed function,
the function variable of the scope lives in a zone which is nuked after
pre-parsing, while the scope lives on. This leaves the {function_}
variable pointer in the scope in a state where it points to
invalid memory, causing "--print-scopes" to crash.
This CL fixes the crash by properly resetting the {function_}
pointer.

TBR=verwaest@chromium.org

Change-Id: Id24dbb605bec883317f676265a920fe0ca662301
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1776094Reviewed-by: 's avatarSimon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63513}
      70dd77c7
  21. 30 Aug, 2019 1 commit
    • Leszek Swirski's avatar
      Reland "[destructuring] Elide coercible check for simple keys" · ef2df57a
      Leszek Swirski authored 
      This is a reland of 1fba0441
Chromium expectation tests have been disabled, and will be enabled

Original change's description:
> [destructuring] Elide coercible check for simple keys
>
> Simple object destructuring, such as `let {a,b} = o`, is less efficient
> than the equivalent assignments `let a = o.a; let b = o.b`. This is
> because it does a nil check of `o` before the assignments. However, this
> nil check is not strictly necessary for simple (i.e. non-computed) names,
> as there will be an equivalent nil check on the first access to o in
> `o.a`. For computed names the computation is unfortunately obervable.
>
> So, we can elide the nil check when the first property (if any) of the
> destructuring target is a non-computed name. This messes a bit with our
> error messages, so we re-use the CallPrinter to also find destructuring
> assignment based errors, and fiddle with the error message there. As
> a side-effect, we also get out the object name in the AST, so we can
> output a slightly nicer error message.
>
> Change-Id: Iafa858e27ed771a146cd3ba57903cc73bb46951d
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1773254
> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63453}

TBR=verwaest@chromium.org

Bug: chromium:999473
Change-Id: Ib0b2e4be433c50521ba1722e1c06b672bfefa405
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1777702Reviewed-by: 's avatarLeszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63477}
      ef2df57a
  23. 29 Aug, 2019 4 commits
    • Adam Klein's avatar
      Revert "[destructuring] Elide coercible check for simple keys" · 28fa4cb4
      Adam Klein authored 
      This reverts commit 1fba0441.

Reason for revert: blocks V8 roll due to layout test failures caused by error message changes:
https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Blink%20Linux/347

Original change's description:
> [destructuring] Elide coercible check for simple keys
> 
> Simple object destructuring, such as `let {a,b} = o`, is less efficient
> than the equivalent assignments `let a = o.a; let b = o.b`. This is
> because it does a nil check of `o` before the assignments. However, this
> nil check is not strictly necessary for simple (i.e. non-computed) names,
> as there will be an equivalent nil check on the first access to o in
> `o.a`. For computed names the computation is unfortunately obervable.
> 
> So, we can elide the nil check when the first property (if any) of the
> destructuring target is a non-computed name. This messes a bit with our
> error messages, so we re-use the CallPrinter to also find destructuring
> assignment based errors, and fiddle with the error message there. As
> a side-effect, we also get out the object name in the AST, so we can
> output a slightly nicer error message.
> 
> Change-Id: Iafa858e27ed771a146cd3ba57903cc73bb46951d
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1773254
> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63453}

TBR=leszeks@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org

Change-Id: I74cf06ebd987e5b8bbe1831b0042c085edf37f5b
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1776994Reviewed-by: 's avatarAdam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63465}
      28fa4cb4
    • Seth Brenith's avatar
      [cleanup][torque] Use @generateCppClass in some simple cases, part 2 · a5811358
      Seth Brenith authored 
      This patch is mostly mechanical. A few changes in
implementation-visitor.cc might be worth mentioning:
- Don't generate both field offset macros and class definitions for the
  same class. This was mostly just to keep me from forgetting to remove
  the DEFINE_FIELD_OFFSET_CONSTANTS part when converting classes, but
  also helpfully flagged that FixedArrayBase wasn't using the generated
  class that it requested.
- Generate forward declarations for all tq-defined classes in
  internal-class-definitions-tq.h. This is helpful for making things
  compile when classes have fields of other class types.
- When generating accessors for union types, use the nearest class type
  that contains the entire union rather than plain Object. This is
  important for compile-time type safety. It also required a few minor
  fixes elsewhere (isolate.cc, modules.cc, scope-info.cc,
  source-text-module.cc, and a correction of the field types in
  CallHandlerInfo to match how they're set in api.cc).

Change-Id: I3b9280e30779ce57fb9f3629eecfec898e26d708
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1774976Reviewed-by: 's avatarMichael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarTobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Seth Brenith <seth.brenith@microsoft.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63458}
      a5811358
    • Leszek Swirski's avatar
      [scopes] Push sloppy eval check through eval scopes · f6057ff1
      Leszek Swirski authored 
      Sloppy eval extends the outer declaration scope's context. This is also
true for sloppy eval inside of other sloppy evals -- the outer declaration
scope's context is extended rather than the outer sloppy eval's
declaration scope. However, we consider eval scopes to also be declaration
scopes, for the purposes of strict eval and caching lookup variables. So,
we need to make sure that we skip through sloppy eval scopes when marking
a scope as calls_sloppy_eval.

In fact, we implement this rather as never marking sloppy eval scopes as
calls_sloppy_eval, under the assumption that the parent scope will already
have been marked calls_sloppy_eval by the outer eval.

As a drive-by, fix a TODO to move this logic from calls_sloppy_eval() to
RecordEvalCall(), rename the variable to something more meaningful, and
make Snapshotting to use a new calls_eval bit on Scope.

Bug: chromium:996751
Change-Id: I27ccc7ef429a7ce60b3bb02bf64a3820ae4a2c36
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1773247
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarToon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63455}
      f6057ff1
    • Leszek Swirski's avatar
      [destructuring] Elide coercible check for simple keys · 1fba0441
      Leszek Swirski authored 
      Simple object destructuring, such as `let {a,b} = o`, is less efficient
than the equivalent assignments `let a = o.a; let b = o.b`. This is
because it does a nil check of `o` before the assignments. However, this
nil check is not strictly necessary for simple (i.e. non-computed) names,
as there will be an equivalent nil check on the first access to o in
`o.a`. For computed names the computation is unfortunately obervable.

So, we can elide the nil check when the first property (if any) of the
destructuring target is a non-computed name. This messes a bit with our
error messages, so we re-use the CallPrinter to also find destructuring
assignment based errors, and fiddle with the error message there. As
a side-effect, we also get out the object name in the AST, so we can
output a slightly nicer error message.

Change-Id: Iafa858e27ed771a146cd3ba57903cc73bb46951d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1773254Reviewed-by: 's avatarLeszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarToon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63453}
      1fba0441
  25. 23 Aug, 2019 1 commit
  27. 21 Aug, 2019 1 commit
  29. 20 Aug, 2019 3 commits
  31. 14 Aug, 2019 1 commit
  33. 12 Aug, 2019 1 commit
  35. 07 Aug, 2019 2 commits
  37. 05 Aug, 2019 1 commit
  39. 02 Aug, 2019 1 commit
    • Leszek Swirski's avatar
      [scopes] Skip dynamic vars in eval scopes during lookup · 9cf089e9
      Leszek Swirski authored 
      For variable proxies in a function inside an eval scope that point to
a dynamic variable in the eval scope, the current scope resolution will
find this variable only when the function is eagerly compiled, as the
eval scope only exists during top-level eval compilation. This causes
a mismatch between lazy- and eager- compiled functions.

With this patch, we skip these dynamic variables during lookup, so that
the lookup for the variable proxy always finds a kDynamicLocal or
kDynamicGlobal, both when compiled lazily and eagerly. This is a minor
pessimisation of performance (as we know that the lookup has to be
dynamic), but unblocks other improvements which require idempotent
bytecode generation (such as lazy source positions).

Note that the alternative, of simply not tracking dynamic variables on
the eval scope at all, is not viable due to needing this information
during conflict detection.

Bug: v8:8510
Bug: v8:9511
Change-Id: Ifa72ec05e9a97b7be418912340081b9656765fd4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1733077
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarDan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarToon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63051}
      9cf089e9
  41. 30 Jul, 2019 1 commit
    • Joyee Cheung's avatar
      [class] parse private accessors · a6dd7f1c
      Joyee Cheung authored 
      This patch adds:

- VariableMode::kPrivateMethod
- VariableMode::kPrivateSetterOnly
- VariableMode::kPrivateGetterOnly
- VariableMode::kPrivateGetterAndSetter

And replace the previous RequiresBrandCheckFlag by inferring
whether the brand check is required from these VariableModes.
It is then possible to check duplicate non-complementary
accessors in the parsers and throw early errors, and allow
complementary accessors to be associated with the same
private name variable.

This patch also adds the following AssignType:

- PRIVATE_METHOD
- PRIVATE_GETTER_ONLY
- PRIVATE_SETTER_ONLY
- PRIVATE_GETTER_AND_SETTER

corresponding to the new VariableModes so that it's possible
to generate specialized code for different type of
private accessor declarations.

Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10W4begYfs7lmldSqBoQBBt_BKamgT8igqxF9u50RGrI/edit

Bug: v8:8330
Change-Id: I0fb61b1be248630d1eadd74fb16d7d64a421f4c4
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1695204
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarRoss McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62988}
      a6dd7f1c
  43. 29 Jul, 2019 4 commits
    • Dan Elphick's avatar
      [parsing] Fix bytecode mismatch for arrow funcs · 4189da7b
      Dan Elphick authored 
      Fixes a bytecode mismatch for arrow functions with default arguments
between eager and lazy compilation. In the former case, parameters with
default values are marked as assigned even if the value never changes
within the function because the parser does not know it's an
arrow-function at the point it sees the assignment.

So this changes ArrowHeadParsingScope::ValidateAndCreateScope to clear
the is_assigned flag on its parameter VariableProxies before it binds
them.

Bug: chromium:988304, v8:8510
Change-Id: I68bf205c73471386181e5fdcec6c8c3b2e527c8f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1724384Reviewed-by: 's avatarLeszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarSathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62962}
      4189da7b
    • Clemens Hammacher's avatar
      Reland "[utils] Make BitField final" · 0cabc6a0
      Clemens Hammacher authored 
      This is a reland of 658ff200

Original change's description:
> [utils] Make BitField final
> 
> We have hundreds of classes that derive from {BitField} without adding
> any functionality. This CL switches all such occurrences to 'using'
> declarations instead.
> 
> Before:
>   class MyBitField : public BitField<int, 6, 4, MyEnum> {};
> After:
>   using MyBitField = BitField<int, 6, 4, MyEnum>;
> 
> This might reduce compilation time by reducing the number of existing
> classes.
> 
> The old pattern is forbidden now by making {BitField} final.
> 
> R=yangguo@chromium.org
> 
> Bug: v8:9396, v8:7629
> Change-Id: I8a8364707e8eae0bb522af2459c160e3293eecbb
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1722565
> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62956}

Bug: v8:9396, v8:7629
Change-Id: Ic68541af9d1e8d0340691970922f282b24a9767f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1724379Reviewed-by: 's avatarYang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62959}
      0cabc6a0
    • Clemens Hammacher's avatar
      Revert "[utils] Make BitField final" · 753a07db
      Clemens Hammacher authored 
      This reverts commit 658ff200.

Reason for revert: Fails no-i18n bot: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20noi18n%20-%20debug/27826

Original change's description:
> [utils] Make BitField final
> 
> We have hundreds of classes that derive from {BitField} without adding
> any functionality. This CL switches all such occurrences to 'using'
> declarations instead.
> 
> Before:
>   class MyBitField : public BitField<int, 6, 4, MyEnum> {};
> After:
>   using MyBitField = BitField<int, 6, 4, MyEnum>;
> 
> This might reduce compilation time by reducing the number of existing
> classes.
> 
> The old pattern is forbidden now by making {BitField} final.
> 
> R=​yangguo@chromium.org
> 
> Bug: v8:9396, v8:7629
> Change-Id: I8a8364707e8eae0bb522af2459c160e3293eecbb
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1722565
> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62956}

TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,clemensh@chromium.org

Change-Id: I50234a09c77aa89fdcf1e01c2497cc08d3ac79a8
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:9396, v8:7629
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1724377Reviewed-by: 's avatarClemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62958}
      753a07db
    • Clemens Hammacher's avatar
      [utils] Make BitField final · 658ff200
      Clemens Hammacher authored 
      We have hundreds of classes that derive from {BitField} without adding
any functionality. This CL switches all such occurrences to 'using'
declarations instead.

Before:
  class MyBitField : public BitField<int, 6, 4, MyEnum> {};
After:
  using MyBitField = BitField<int, 6, 4, MyEnum>;

This might reduce compilation time by reducing the number of existing
classes.

The old pattern is forbidden now by making {BitField} final.

R=yangguo@chromium.org

Bug: v8:9396, v8:7629
Change-Id: I8a8364707e8eae0bb522af2459c160e3293eecbb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1722565Reviewed-by: 's avatarYang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62956}
      658ff200
  45. 15 Jul, 2019 1 commit
  47. 09 Jul, 2019 1 commit
  49. 08 Jul, 2019 1 commit
  51. 03 Jul, 2019 2 commits
  53. 01 Jul, 2019 1 commit
    • Leszek Swirski's avatar
      [parser] Mark maybe_assigned recursively for shadowing vars · fc4bcce1
      Leszek Swirski authored 
      The previous fix for this bug (crrev.com/c/1678365) pessimistically
would mark all shadowed variables as maybe_assigned. Unfortunately,
this doesn't work across a parse/preparse boundary, where the shadowing
variable is found via Scope::AnalyzePartially while the shadowed
variable is outside of the preparser entry point. In those cases, the
referencing proxy is copied to the outer scope, in which case the
dynamicness of the original lookup is lost and the maybe_assigned
pessimisation no longer applies.

This means that maybe_assigned status of a variable is dependent on
which function is being parsed. In particular, it can cause bytecode
to change on recompilation, causing issues for lazy source positions.

This patch allows SetMaybeAssigned to walk its shadowed variables,
and recursively set them to maybe_assigned too. Checking for
maybe_assigned changing prevents this recursion from having a
quadratic performance failure mode.

Bug: v8:8510
Bug: v8:9394
Change-Id: Id19fe1fad5ec8f0f9aa03b00eb24497f88f71216
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1677265
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarGeorg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62458}
      fc4bcce1
  55. 28 Jun, 2019 1 commit