1. 05 Jul, 2018 1 commit
  2. 03 May, 2018 1 commit
  3. 02 Mar, 2018 1 commit
  4. 16 Feb, 2018 1 commit
  5. 27 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  6. 25 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  7. 17 Jul, 2017 1 commit
    • Leszek Swirski's avatar
      Revert "[runtime] Move profiler ticks from SFI to feedback vector" · 14c5c4fd
      Leszek Swirski authored
      This reverts commit a2fcdc7c.
      
      Reason for revert: Large regressions in RCS (https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=740126)
      
      Original change's description:
      > [runtime] Move profiler ticks from SFI to feedback vector
      > 
      > Instead of counting profiler ticks on the shared function info (which is
      > shared between native contexts), count them on the feedback vector
      > (which is not). This allows us to continue pushing optimization
      > decisions off the SFI, onto the feedback vector.
      > 
      > Note that a side-effect of this is that ICs don't have to walk the stack
      > to reset profiler ticks, as they can access the feedback vector directly
      > from their feedback nexus.
      > 
      > Change-Id: I232ae9e759fca75cd89d393148a4ff42caa2646f
      > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/544888
      > Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
      > Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
      > Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
      > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46411}
      
      TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,ishell@chromium.org
      
      # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
      
      Change-Id: Id587e4172e300c420f93c49744a2a0e66696edf8
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/574227
      Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarLeszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46702}
      14c5c4fd
  8. 14 Jul, 2017 1 commit
    • Alexey Kozyatinskiy's avatar
      [inspector] improve return position of explicit return in non-async function · 08965860
      Alexey Kozyatinskiy authored
      Goal of this CL: explicit return from non-async function has position after
      return expression as return position (will unblock [1]).
      
      BytecodeArrayBuilder has SetStatementPosition and SetExpressionPosition methods.
      If one of these methods is called then next generated bytecode will get passed
      position. It's general treatment for most cases.
      Unfortunately it doesn't work for Returns:
      - debugger requires source positions exactly on kReturn bytecode in stepping
        implementation,
      - BytecodeGenerator::BuildReturn and BytecodeGenerator::BuildAsyncReturn
        generates more then one bytecode and general solution will put return position
        on first generated bytecode,
      - it's not easy to split BuildReturn function into two parts to allow something
        like following in BytecodeGenerator::VisitReturnStatement since generated
        bytecodes are actually controlled by execution_control().
      ..->BuildReturnPrologue();
      ..->SetReturnPosition(stmt);
      ..->Return();
      
      In this CL we pass ReturnStatement through ExecutionControl and use it for
      position when we emit return bytecode right here.
      
      So this CL only will improve return position for returns inside of non-async
      functions, I'll address async functions later.
      
      [1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/543161/
      
      Change-Id: Iede512c120b00c209990bf50c20e7d23dc0d65db
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/560738
      Commit-Queue: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarAdam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarMichael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarRoss McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: 's avatarJakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46687}
      08965860
  9. 12 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  10. 05 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  11. 16 Jun, 2017 1 commit
  12. 29 May, 2017 1 commit
  13. 24 May, 2017 2 commits
  14. 10 May, 2017 1 commit
  15. 08 May, 2017 1 commit
    • Ross McIlroy's avatar
      Revert "Reland: [TypeFeedbackVector] Store optimized code in the vector" · fd749344
      Ross McIlroy authored
      This reverts commit 662aa425.
      
      Reason for revert: Crashing on Canary
      BUG=chromium:718891
      
      Original change's description:
      > Reland: [TypeFeedbackVector] Store optimized code in the vector
      > 
      > Since the feedback vector is itself a native context structure, why
      > not store optimized code for a function in there rather than in
      > a map from native context to code? This allows us to get rid of
      > the optimized code map in the SharedFunctionInfo, saving a pointer,
      > and making lookup of any optimized code quicker.
      > 
      > Original patch by Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org>
      > 
      > BUG=v8:6246
      > TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org
      > 
      > Change-Id: Ic83e4011148164ef080c63215a0c77f1dfb7f327
      > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/494487
      > Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
      > Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
      > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45084}
      
      TBR=ulan@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org,jarin@chromium.org
      # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.
      BUG=v8:6246
      
      Change-Id: Idab648d6fe260862c2a0e35366df19dcecf13a82
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/498633Reviewed-by: 's avatarRoss McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
      Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45174}
      fd749344
  16. 04 May, 2017 1 commit
    • Ross McIlroy's avatar
      Reland: [TypeFeedbackVector] Store optimized code in the vector · 662aa425
      Ross McIlroy authored
      Since the feedback vector is itself a native context structure, why
      not store optimized code for a function in there rather than in
      a map from native context to code? This allows us to get rid of
      the optimized code map in the SharedFunctionInfo, saving a pointer,
      and making lookup of any optimized code quicker.
      
      Original patch by Michael Stanton <mvstanton@chromium.org>
      
      BUG=v8:6246
      TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,ulan@chromium.org
      
      Change-Id: Ic83e4011148164ef080c63215a0c77f1dfb7f327
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/494487Reviewed-by: 's avatarJaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
      Commit-Queue: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45084}
      662aa425
  17. 02 May, 2017 2 commits
  18. 30 Jan, 2017 1 commit
    • mvstanton's avatar
      [TypeFeedbackVector] Combine the literals array and the feedback vector. · 93f05b64
      mvstanton authored
      They have the same lifetime. It's a match!
      
      Both structures are native context dependent and dealt with (creation,
      clearing, gathering feedback) at the same time. By treating the spaces used
      for literal boilerplates as feedback vector slots, we no longer have to keep
      track of the materialized literal count elsewhere.
      
      A follow-on CL removes even more parser infrastructure related to this count.
      
      BUG=v8:5456
      
      Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2655853010
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42771}
      93f05b64
  19. 04 Oct, 2016 1 commit
  20. 30 Sep, 2016 1 commit
    • rmcilroy's avatar
      [Interpreter] Replace BytecodeRegisterAllocator with a simple bump pointer. · 27fe988b
      rmcilroy authored
      There are only a few occasions where we allocate a register in an outer
      expression allocation scope, which makes the costly free-list approach
      of the BytecodeRegisterAllocator unecessary. This CL replaces all
      occurrences with moves to the accumulator and stores to a register
      allocated in the correct scope. By doing this, we can simplify the
      BytecodeRegisterAllocator to be a simple bump-pointer allocator
      with registers released in the same order as allocated.
      
      The following changes are also made:
       - Make BytecodeRegisterOptimizer able to use registers which have been
         unallocated, but not yet reused
       - Remove RegisterExpressionResultScope and rename
         AccumulatorExpressionResultScope to ValueExpressionResultScope
       - Introduce RegisterList to represent consecutive register
         allocations, and use this for operands to call bytecodes.
      
      By avoiding the free-list handling, this gives another couple of
      percent on CodeLoad.
      
      BUG=v8:4280
      
      Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2369873002
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39905}
      27fe988b
  21. 06 Sep, 2016 2 commits
    • leszeks's avatar
      [Interpreter] Remove constant pool type in tests · b28b7e13
      leszeks authored
      For historical reasons, the interpreter's bytecode expectations tests
      required a type for the constant pool. This had two disadvantages:
      
       1. Strings and numbers were not visible in mixed pools, and
       2. Mismatches of pool types (e.g. when rebaselining) would cause parser
          errors
      
      This removes the pool types, making everything 'mixed', but appending
      the values to string and number valued constants. Specifying a pool type
      in the *.golden header now prints a warning (for backwards compatibility).
      
      BUG=v8:5350
      
      Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2310103002
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39216}
      b28b7e13
    • jochen's avatar
      Store the ScopeInfo in WithContexts · 77c4ba07
      jochen authored
      This will allow for chaining ScopeInfos together to form the same chains
      as contexts chains currently do.
      
      BUG=v8:5215
      R=mstarzinger@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org,rmcilroy@chromium.org
      
      Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2314483002
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39192}
      77c4ba07
  22. 18 Aug, 2016 1 commit
  23. 09 Aug, 2016 1 commit
  24. 29 Jul, 2016 1 commit
  25. 21 Jun, 2016 1 commit
  26. 01 Jun, 2016 1 commit
  27. 27 May, 2016 1 commit
  28. 11 May, 2016 1 commit
  29. 29 Apr, 2016 1 commit
  30. 16 Mar, 2016 1 commit
  31. 15 Mar, 2016 1 commit
    • adamk's avatar
      Remove Scope::scope_contains_with_ bit · 108efd7f
      adamk authored
      This part of Scope has existed since V8's initial check in, but from what
      I can tell it's not required to implement "with". The only tests that
      depend upon it are tests of the debugger and the Scope mirrors, but the
      resulting test behavior after removing the bit still seems perfectly
      reasonable to me. In fact, with the included fix for scope name collection,
      the scope mirror is actually improved with this change.
      
      As a bi-product, this fixes the attached bug, about the contains_with
      bit having inconsistent values in some arrow function compilation
      scenarios.
      
      BUG=chromium:592353
      LOG=n
      CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
      
      Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1804783002
      
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34802}
      108efd7f
  32. 09 Mar, 2016 1 commit
  33. 08 Mar, 2016 1 commit
    • verwaest's avatar
      Don't do any special normalization if a boilerplate contains function literals. · fd405704
      verwaest authored
      This mechanism was used to ensure that functions ended up as constants on the map of prototypes defined using object literals, e.g.,:
      
      function.prototype = {
        method: function() { ... }
      }
      
      Nowadays we treat prototypes specially, and make all their functions constants when an object turns prototype. Hence this special custom code isn't necessary anymore.
      
      This also affects boilerplates that do not become prototypes. Their functions will not be constants but fields instead. Calling their methods will slow down. However, multiple instances of the same boilerplate will stay monomorphic. We'll have to see what the impact is for such objects, but preliminary benchmarks do not show this as an important regression.
      
      BUG=chromium:593008
      LOG=n
      
      Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1772423002
      
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34602}
      fd405704
  34. 25 Feb, 2016 1 commit
    • ssanfilippo's avatar
      [Interpreter] Refactor bytecode generator test suite. · 6ae03059
      ssanfilippo authored
      Bytecode expectations have been moved to external (.golden) files,
      one per test. Each test in the suite builds a representation of the
      the compiled bytecode using BytecodeExpectationsPrinter. The output is
      then compared to the golden file. If the comparision fails, a textual
      diff can be used to identify the discrepancies.
      
      Only the test snippets are left in the cc file, which also allows to
      make it more compact and meaningful. Leaving the snippets in the cc
      file was a deliberate choice to allow keeping the "truth" about the
      tests in the cc file, which will rarely change, as opposed to golden
      files.
      
      Golden files can be generated and kept up to date using
      generate-bytecode-expectations, which also means that the test suite
      can be batch updated whenever the bytecode or golden format changes.
      
      The golden format has been slightly amended (no more comments about
      `void*`, add size of the bytecode array) following the consideration
      made while converting the tests.
      
      There is also a fix: BytecodeExpectationsPrinter::top_level_ was left
      uninitialized, leading to undefined behaviour.
      
      BUG=v8:4280
      LOG=N
      
      Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1717293002
      
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34285}
      6ae03059