- 24 Sep, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Marja Hölttä authored
The actual fix is in LoadIC::ComputeHandler (checking lookup_start_object == holder instead of receiver == holder) + the LookupIterator changes for preserving lookup_start_object. The rest is renaming / refactoring. Reland: not relying on the prototype validity cell after all Previous version: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2414039 Bug: v8:9237, chromium:1127653 Change-Id: I1949442f8ddcecb776f0c5d2cf737cb75f80e313 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2428588Reviewed-by:
Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70112}
-
Marja Hölttä authored
This reverts commit ab7e6df0. Reason for revert: Several fuzz bugs: chromium:1131469, chromium:1131525, chromium:1131779 Original change's description: > [super ic] Fix more receiver vs lookup start object vs holder confusion > > The actual fix is in LoadIC::ComputeHandler (checking > lookup_start_object == holder instead of receiver == holder) + the > LookupIterator changes for preserving lookup_start_object. > > The rest is renaming / refactoring. > > Bug: v8:9237, chromium:1127653 > Change-Id: Ieef46fb46ababa79623951c48639429c5b552d2d > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2414039 > Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70045} TBR=marja@chromium.org,ishell@chromium.org # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago. Bug: v8:9237 Bug: chromium:1127653, chromium:1131469, chromium:1131525, chromium:1131779 Change-Id: I1bad5ba1dcfe9a0de8ce775feac2d3bfd7264c8c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2426620 Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70107}
-
Jakob Gruber authored
This fixes a case in which we forgot to assign flags to TextNodes created through AddBmpCharacters AddNonBmpSurrogatePairs AddLoneLeadSurrogates AddLoneTrailSurrogates functions. If these initially had a flag (e.g. case-insensitive 'i') set, that information was lost. This bug resulted in missing case folding in no_i18n builds (perhaps other things as well that just aren't covered by our test suite). Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_noi18n_rel_ng Bug: v8:10131,v8:10120 Change-Id: Icef4f0dbd47971a538e07bab2f1067c383fd59c6 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2423718Reviewed-by:
Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70106}
-
- 22 Sep, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Marja Hölttä authored
The actual fix is in LoadIC::ComputeHandler (checking lookup_start_object == holder instead of receiver == holder) + the LookupIterator changes for preserving lookup_start_object. The rest is renaming / refactoring. Bug: v8:9237, chromium:1127653 Change-Id: Ieef46fb46ababa79623951c48639429c5b552d2d Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2414039 Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70045}
-
- 08 Sep, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Marja Hölttä authored
Bug: v8:9237 Change-Id: I06d7e74ba0360334e6fa65c19f24548e220e4c69 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2349297 Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69735}
-
- 18 Aug, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Shu-yu Guo authored
This is a normative PR that reached consensus at the June 2019 TC39: https://github.com/tc39/test262/pull/2299 Bug: v8:9646 Change-Id: Idbeea703fe264da43825729e7b37a08a1bb10001 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2360907 Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69466}
-
Shu-yu Guo authored
This is a normative PR that reached consensus at the June 2019 TC39: https://github.com/tc39/test262/pull/2299 Bug: v8:9646 Change-Id: I8cb927b9e9231dfb71ebf47171205a096350e38b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2360905Reviewed-by:
Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69460}
-
- 03 Aug, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Shu-yu Guo authored
This reached consensus in the July 2020 TC39: https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2054 Bug: v8:10769 Change-Id: Iecea1d9d9c9be5c2fbfb820aed2285719c4e6382 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2333350 Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69206}
-
- 24 Jun, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Camillo Bruni authored
With this CL d8 exits with an error code if there is an unhandled promise rejection, e.g. due tue a failed assertion in a promise. Up until now these assertions were just ignored. Bug: v8:10556 Change-Id: I25f20e4be45a2de130562deb15f6a144f0ac976f Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2238569Reviewed-by:
Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68503}
-
- 22 Jun, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Dan Elphick authored
This changes black/white list to block/allow list. Bug: v8:10619 Change-Id: Id55d72f90891670ca57b62dfeb6b3251025927dc Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2257228Reviewed-by:
Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68464}
-
- 09 Jun, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Marja Hölttä authored
Promise.{all,allSettled,any,race} should check resolve is a function before opening their iteratable. PR: https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1912 PR for Promise.any: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-promise-any/pull/65 This CL includes the following cleanup changes: - Made it more explicit that the constructor is a Constructor. - Removed unnecessary nested try blocks (a try can have both a catch and a label). - Moved commonly used definitions out of promise-race.tq where they don't belong. - Made the parameter order of PerformPromiseAll match the spec. Bug: v8:10578 Change-Id: I9deb5d5106db7350a0d0ad52f165ff2469e7074b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2232544 Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68260}
-
- 28 Apr, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Shu-yu Guo authored
Since ES6, optional arguments are treated the same as undefined. This was recently cleaned up in https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1411. The current Torque implementation of %TypedArray%.from incorrectly interpreted the old (and confusing) language of a parameter being "not present" as testing using arguments.length instead of testing directly for undefined. Bug: v8:10458 Change-Id: I055f1fa3be570a31a4f7369ba5b51b7d6b022f0a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2168674 Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67454}
-
Marja Hölttä authored
PerformPromiseAll doesn't set iteratorRecord.[[Done]] to true if Promise.resolve is not callable. This makes Promise.all call IteratorClose. BUG=v8:10452 Change-Id: Icbe17416a733f68ef09f1c610d715f544c2a3b8a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2164789Reviewed-by:
Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67416}
-
- 24 Apr, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Shu-yu Guo authored
Normative spec change: https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1814 Bug: v8:10382 Change-Id: Ib17ece9f0c8f75702c828b5336e75cab5d173e5e Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2163876 Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67376}
-
Timothy Gu authored
This is a reland of 29c1eab9 Original change's description: > [builtins] Clean up the use of class_name / ES5 [[Class]] > > Before ES2015, the ES spec had a [[Class]] internal slot for all > objects, which Object.prototype.toString() would use to figure the > returned string. Post-ES2015, the [[Class]] slot was removed in spec for > all objects, with the @@toStringTag well-known symbol the proper way to > change Object.prototype.toString() output. > > At the time, spec-identical handling without the use of [[Class]] was > implemented in V8 for all objects other than API objects, where issues > with the Web IDL spec [1] prevented Blink, and hence V8, to totally > migrate to @@toStringTag. However, since 2016 [2] Blink has been setting > @@toStringTag on API class prototypes to manage the > Object.prototype.toString() output, so the legacy [[Class]] handling in > V8 has not been necessary for the past couple of years. > > This CL removes the remaining legacy [[Class]] handling in > Object.prototype.toString(), JSReceiver::class_name(), and > GetConstructorName(). However, it does not remove the class_name field > in FunctionTemplateInfo, as it is still used for the `name` property of > created functions. > > This CL also cleans up other places in the codebase that still reference > [[Class]]. > > This change should have minimal impact on web-compatibility. For the > change to be observable, a script must do one of the following: > > 1. delete APIConstructor.prototype[Symbol.toStringTag]; > 2. Object.setPrototypeOf(apiObject, somethingElse); > > Before this CL, these changes will not change the apiObject.toString() > output. But after this CL, they will make apiObject.toString() show > "[object Object]" (in the first case) or the @@toStringTag of the other > prototype (in the latter case). > > However, both are deemed unlikely. @@toStringTag is not well-known > feature of JavaScript, nor does it get tampered much on API > constructors. In the second case, setting the prototype of an API object > would effectly render the object useless, as all its methods (including > property getters/setters) would no longer be accessible. > > Currently, @@toStringTag-based API object branding is not yet > implemented by other browsers. This V8 bug in particular has been an > impediment to standardizing toString behavior. Fixing this bug will > unblock [3] and lead to a better Web IDL spec, and better toString() > compatibility for all. > > [1]: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28244 > [2]: https://crrev.com/909c0d7d5a53c8526ded351683c65ea7d17531d4 > [3]: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/357 > > Bug: chromium:793406 > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux-rel > Change-Id: Iceded24e37afa2646ec385d5018909f55b177f93 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2146996 > Commit-Queue: Timothy Gu <timothygu@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67327} Bug: chromium:793406 Change-Id: Ia5d97bd4e1c44cadc6f18a17ffc9d06b038cf8f1 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux-rel Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_blink_rel Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2163881 Auto-Submit: Timothy Gu <timothygu@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67361}
-
Bill Budge authored
This reverts commit 29c1eab9. Reason for revert: Causes Blink test failures: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Blink%20Linux/4222 Original change's description: > [builtins] Clean up the use of class_name / ES5 [[Class]] > > Before ES2015, the ES spec had a [[Class]] internal slot for all > objects, which Object.prototype.toString() would use to figure the > returned string. Post-ES2015, the [[Class]] slot was removed in spec for > all objects, with the @@toStringTag well-known symbol the proper way to > change Object.prototype.toString() output. > > At the time, spec-identical handling without the use of [[Class]] was > implemented in V8 for all objects other than API objects, where issues > with the Web IDL spec [1] prevented Blink, and hence V8, to totally > migrate to @@toStringTag. However, since 2016 [2] Blink has been setting > @@toStringTag on API class prototypes to manage the > Object.prototype.toString() output, so the legacy [[Class]] handling in > V8 has not been necessary for the past couple of years. > > This CL removes the remaining legacy [[Class]] handling in > Object.prototype.toString(), JSReceiver::class_name(), and > GetConstructorName(). However, it does not remove the class_name field > in FunctionTemplateInfo, as it is still used for the `name` property of > created functions. > > This CL also cleans up other places in the codebase that still reference > [[Class]]. > > This change should have minimal impact on web-compatibility. For the > change to be observable, a script must do one of the following: > > 1. delete APIConstructor.prototype[Symbol.toStringTag]; > 2. Object.setPrototypeOf(apiObject, somethingElse); > > Before this CL, these changes will not change the apiObject.toString() > output. But after this CL, they will make apiObject.toString() show > "[object Object]" (in the first case) or the @@toStringTag of the other > prototype (in the latter case). > > However, both are deemed unlikely. @@toStringTag is not well-known > feature of JavaScript, nor does it get tampered much on API > constructors. In the second case, setting the prototype of an API object > would effectly render the object useless, as all its methods (including > property getters/setters) would no longer be accessible. > > Currently, @@toStringTag-based API object branding is not yet > implemented by other browsers. This V8 bug in particular has been an > impediment to standardizing toString behavior. Fixing this bug will > unblock [3] and lead to a better Web IDL spec, and better toString() > compatibility for all. > > [1]: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28244 > [2]: https://crrev.com/909c0d7d5a53c8526ded351683c65ea7d17531d4 > [3]: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/357 > > Bug: chromium:793406 > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux-rel > Change-Id: Iceded24e37afa2646ec385d5018909f55b177f93 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2146996 > Commit-Queue: Timothy Gu <timothygu@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67327} TBR=verwaest@chromium.org,timothygu@chromium.org Change-Id: I678d2ffc1064b1d1ddb62024cc23c6c41b216ef4 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: chromium:793406 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux-rel Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2163956Reviewed-by:
Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67349}
-
- 23 Apr, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Timothy Gu authored
Before ES2015, the ES spec had a [[Class]] internal slot for all objects, which Object.prototype.toString() would use to figure the returned string. Post-ES2015, the [[Class]] slot was removed in spec for all objects, with the @@toStringTag well-known symbol the proper way to change Object.prototype.toString() output. At the time, spec-identical handling without the use of [[Class]] was implemented in V8 for all objects other than API objects, where issues with the Web IDL spec [1] prevented Blink, and hence V8, to totally migrate to @@toStringTag. However, since 2016 [2] Blink has been setting @@toStringTag on API class prototypes to manage the Object.prototype.toString() output, so the legacy [[Class]] handling in V8 has not been necessary for the past couple of years. This CL removes the remaining legacy [[Class]] handling in Object.prototype.toString(), JSReceiver::class_name(), and GetConstructorName(). However, it does not remove the class_name field in FunctionTemplateInfo, as it is still used for the `name` property of created functions. This CL also cleans up other places in the codebase that still reference [[Class]]. This change should have minimal impact on web-compatibility. For the change to be observable, a script must do one of the following: 1. delete APIConstructor.prototype[Symbol.toStringTag]; 2. Object.setPrototypeOf(apiObject, somethingElse); Before this CL, these changes will not change the apiObject.toString() output. But after this CL, they will make apiObject.toString() show "[object Object]" (in the first case) or the @@toStringTag of the other prototype (in the latter case). However, both are deemed unlikely. @@toStringTag is not well-known feature of JavaScript, nor does it get tampered much on API constructors. In the second case, setting the prototype of an API object would effectly render the object useless, as all its methods (including property getters/setters) would no longer be accessible. Currently, @@toStringTag-based API object branding is not yet implemented by other browsers. This V8 bug in particular has been an impediment to standardizing toString behavior. Fixing this bug will unblock [3] and lead to a better Web IDL spec, and better toString() compatibility for all. [1]: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28244 [2]: https://crrev.com/909c0d7d5a53c8526ded351683c65ea7d17531d4 [3]: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/357 Bug: chromium:793406 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.chromium.try:linux-rel Change-Id: Iceded24e37afa2646ec385d5018909f55b177f93 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2146996 Commit-Queue: Timothy Gu <timothygu@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67327}
-
- 20 Apr, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Marja Hölttä authored
Spec: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-promise-any Bug: v8:9808 Change-Id: I568b2444df9f00f615f2cda1268e4ecc5b36667e Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2139571 Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67224}
-
- 14 Apr, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Georg Neis authored
For example, when --fuzzing is off, %OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall now crashes when given a non-function argument. The following behaviors remain unchanged for now: - %DeoptimizeFunction continues to do nothing if the function is not optimized. - %DeoptimizeNow continues to do nothing if the top-most JS function is not optimized. - %OptimizeOSR continues to do nothing if the function already has optimized code. Bug: v8:10249 Change-Id: I35d2f3d50ce3f94c8ffccabe50fb4df2b70ce028 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2137406 Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#67121}
-
- 03 Mar, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Gruber authored
This is a reland of c6c9d4bf Original change's description: > Update unicode-regexp-ignore-case-noi18n expectations > > There appear to be one or several bugs in noi18n mode such that > expectations in this test are no longer met. This CL updates > expectations to the current behavior and re-enables the test so we at > least preserve coverage in the other cases. > > The behavior in question should be investigated in the future > (low priority). > > Bug: v8:10120 > Change-Id: Ib7c9a18133a386e6e39ee54d68ce4106d9b28c84 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2081815 > Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66524} Bug: v8:10120 Change-Id: Ib2ee68e26c2aebe2eeab3ec9f7bc263fd79f3773 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2083291 Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66550}
-
- 02 Mar, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Clemens Backes authored
This reverts commit c6c9d4bf. Reason for revert: Fails on noi18n bot: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20noi18n%20-%20debug/30737 Original change's description: > Update unicode-regexp-ignore-case-noi18n expectations > > There appear to be one or several bugs in noi18n mode such that > expectations in this test are no longer met. This CL updates > expectations to the current behavior and re-enables the test so we at > least preserve coverage in the other cases. > > The behavior in question should be investigated in the future > (low priority). > > Bug: v8:10120 > Change-Id: Ib7c9a18133a386e6e39ee54d68ce4106d9b28c84 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2081815 > Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66524} TBR=jkummerow@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org Change-Id: I960b90fe3679ef4c04782ca9ac9b91454e636dbb No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:10120 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2083024Reviewed-by:
Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66525}
-
Jakob Gruber authored
There appear to be one or several bugs in noi18n mode such that expectations in this test are no longer met. This CL updates expectations to the current behavior and re-enables the test so we at least preserve coverage in the other cases. The behavior in question should be investigated in the future (low priority). Bug: v8:10120 Change-Id: Ib7c9a18133a386e6e39ee54d68ce4106d9b28c84 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2081815 Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66524}
-
- 22 Jan, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Kummerow authored
The actual allocatable size still depends on the allocator; in particular Blink's ArrayBufferAllocator is currently limited to 2GB. WebAssembly memories are not affected by this change (i.e. still capped at 2GB as well). For 32-bit platforms, the limit remains at 2**30-1 (=max smi) elements. Bug: v8:4153 Change-Id: If0d6047dd4061028688d85a3dc0a2684dcca8693 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2007495Reviewed-by:
Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65924}
-
- 20 Dec, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Tobias Tebbi authored
This reverts commit 91e3243d. Reason for revert: This deopts to the wrong point. Original change's description: > Extend GetIterator bytecode to perform JSReceiver check on object[Symbol.iterator]() > > Current GetIterator bytecode loads and calls @@iterator property on a > given object. This change extends the bytecode functionality to check > whether the value returned after calling @@iterator property is a valid > JSReceiver. The bytecode throws SymbolIteratorInvalid exception if the > returned value is not a valid JSReceiver. This change absorbs the > functionality of additional two bytecodes - JumpIfJSReceiver and > CallRuntime, that are part of the iterator protocol in the GetIterator > bytecode. > > Bug: v8:9489 > Change-Id: I9e84cfe85eeb9a1b8a97ca0595375ac26ba1bbfd > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1792905 > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Swapnil Gaikwad <swapnilgaikwad@google.com> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63704} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,swapnilgaikwad@google.com # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago. Bug: v8:9489 Change-Id: I9324b5b01ead29912ad793a1e7b4d009643d7901 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1960288Reviewed-by:
Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65541}
-
- 19 Dec, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Shu-yu Guo authored
The spec was normatively changed to simplify var scopes for parameter expressions. Previously there was a per-parameter var scope in sloppy mode so direct evals could introduce vars that did not escape the parameter position. That semantics is complex both for the programmer and implementation and has resulted in bugs in the past. Furthermore, it has never been fully interoperable (with Safari in particular). The spec was instead changed to be simpler: to have a single var scope for sloppy evals in parameters that encloses the parameter scope and body scope. This simplification lets us remove expression-scope-reparenter. Drive-by removal of stale reference to PatternRewriter. Bug: v8:7532 Change-Id: Iade5594abe0009f7f3f6a1adad18628b17e1e779 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1962471Reviewed-by:
Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65517}
-
- 09 Dec, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Leszek Swirski authored
We use the compilation entry point as a caching scope for deserializing lookups, to avoid redundantly iterating over parent scopes when accessing the same variable multiple times. However, this caching scope messes with lookups that are looking for lexical name conflicts, as opposed to just resolving variables. In particular, it messes with name conflict lookups and sloppy block function hoisting checks, when there are other scopes in the way, e.g. function f() { let x; try { throw 0; } catch (x) { // This catch is the entry scope // Naive use of caches will find the catch-bound x (which is // a VAR), and declare 'no conflict'. eval("var x;"); // Naive use of caches will find the catch-bound x (which is // a VAR), and determine that this function can be hoisted. eval("{ function x() {} }"); } } Previously, we worked around this by avoiding cache uses for these lookups, but this had the issue of instead caching the same variable multiple times, on different scopes. In particular, we saw: function f() { with ({}) { // This with is the entry scope, any other scope would do // though. // The conflict check on `var f` caches the function name // variable on the function scope, the subsequent 'real' // lookup of `f` caches the function name variable on the // entry i.e. with scope. eval("var f; f;"); } } With this patch, we change the caching behaviour to cache on the first non-eval declaration scope above the eval -- in the above examples, this becomes the parent function "f". For compilations with no intermediate non-decl scopes (no with or catch scopes between the function and eval) this becomes equivalent to the existing entry-point-based caching. This means that normal lookups do have to (sometimes) iterate more scopes, and we do have to be careful when using the cache to not use it for lookups in these intermediate scopes (a new IsOuterScope DCHECK guards against this), but we can now safely ignore the cache scope when doing the name-collision lookups, as they only iterate up to the outer non-eval declaration scope anyway. Bug: chromium:1026603 Bug: chromium:1029461 Change-Id: I9e7a96ce4b8adbc7ed47a49fba6fba58b526235b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1955731 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65391}
-
- 27 Nov, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Joshua Litt authored
This reverts commit 48c9ca44. Reason for revert: Possible clusterfuzz issues Bug: chromium:1028952 Original change's description: > [names] Fix some test262 name tests to conform with spec changes > > In order to reflect web reality, TC39 has made some slight changes to > name descriptors, see https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1490 for > details. V8 was mostly already in compliance with these changes, but > ThrowTypeError and anonymous classes needed some slight changes. > > Bug: v8:9646 > Change-Id: I163238954938f0c005e3adbc61b90498e01436da > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1764622 > Reviewed-by: Sathya Gunasekaran <gsathya@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Joshua Litt <joshualitt@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63373} TBR=gsathya@chromium.org,joshualitt@chromium.org Bug: v8:9646 Change-Id: I06dd5527d30052d9c9dfc45a2862be930274aba7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1939948Reviewed-by:
Joshua Litt <joshualitt@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Joshua Litt <joshualitt@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65216}
-
- 14 Nov, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Igor Sheludko authored
... that started failing on AIX where the allocation of a huge ArrayBuffer succeeds. Bug: v8:4153 Change-Id: I322c71e01edccb254a523f7f85817971b6c68242 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1914561Reviewed-by:
Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64960}
-
- 11 Nov, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Igor Sheludko authored
... even with ptr-compr. Although full uintptr-sized TypedArrays are not supported yet we may already start using uint32-sized typed arrays as we no longer rely on TypedArray length to be a Smi. Bug: v8:4153 Change-Id: If179541ad4f02c4ec7de9d1f3836138fe526d8a5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1905847 Commit-Queue: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64897}
-
- 01 Nov, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Mythri Alle authored
This reverts commit b8ac4eb4. Reason for revert: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1020533 Original change's description: > [runtime] Correctly handle global stores when global object has proxies > > When global object has proxies we should first call hasProperty and > then call SetProperty if has property returns true. This cl fixes both > StoreGlobal and StoreLookupGlobal to correctly handle these cases. > > Bug: chromium:1018871 > Change-Id: I140514e2119c6bab2125abcdc1b19d46526be5ff > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1889885 > Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64687} TBR=mythria@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago. Bug: chromium:1018871 Change-Id: I5abbf9275cba17576e1b1e492abd36d6bc1ca1bf Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1893194Reviewed-by:
Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64714}
-
- 31 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Mythri A authored
When global object has proxies we should first call hasProperty and then call SetProperty if has property returns true. This cl fixes both StoreGlobal and StoreLookupGlobal to correctly handle these cases. Bug: chromium:1018871 Change-Id: I140514e2119c6bab2125abcdc1b19d46526be5ff Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1889885 Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64687}
-
- 28 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Mythri A authored
When global object has proxies we should first call hasProperty and then call GetProperty according to spec. This cl fixes both LoadGlobal and LoadLookupGlobal to correctly handle these cases. Also fixes tests that didn't expect hasProperty to be called. Change-Id: I3a45df7ae24be74dd46cf04cafbf8c2d7018b3af Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1876059 Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64580}
-
- 25 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Leszek Swirski authored
Both LO_SPACE and NEW_LO_SPACE use the basic page management system of LargeObjectSpace, but implement different AllocateRaw methods (with the NEW_LO_SPACE version shadowing the LO_SPACE version). To clean this up, and allow other future LargeObjectSpace implementations (in particular, an off-thread variant), refactored the current LargeObjectSpace into a base class, and make both LargeObjectSpace (renamed to OldLargeObjectSpace) and NewLargeObjectSpace extend this class. Bug: chromium:1011762 Change-Id: I41b45b97f2611611dcfde677213131396df03a5e Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1876824 Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Auto-Submit: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64560}
-
- 18 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Shu-yu Guo authored
Split up the test so each test runs in a fresh Isolate with pristine protector state. Note that testArrayConcatES5 was not split out because it is a duplicate of mjsunit/array-concat.js, and testConcatRevokedProxy has already been split out as mjsunit/es6/array-concat-revocable-revoked-proxy-[12].js. Bug: v8:9837 Change-Id: I8f744b0263c82f1dae61a55032124d9129f8e6f3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1864007Reviewed-by:
Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64366}
-
- 16 Sep, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Kummerow authored
This reimplements the "--time" option of run-tests.py to print the 20 slowest tests, on top of json_test_results infrastructure just like the bots do it. Additionally this CL speeds up a bunch of slow tests. Bug: v8:9396 Change-Id: I40797d2c8c3bfdd310b72f15cd1a035844b7c6f3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1803635 Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63786}
-
- 12 Sep, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Peter Marshall authored
Bug: chromium:913887 Change-Id: If533bb85675456b674f79486b06a44e447f40aee Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1739371Reviewed-by:
Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63715}
-
Swapnil Gaikwad authored
Current GetIterator bytecode loads and calls @@iterator property on a given object. This change extends the bytecode functionality to check whether the value returned after calling @@iterator property is a valid JSReceiver. The bytecode throws SymbolIteratorInvalid exception if the returned value is not a valid JSReceiver. This change absorbs the functionality of additional two bytecodes - JumpIfJSReceiver and CallRuntime, that are part of the iterator protocol in the GetIterator bytecode. Bug: v8:9489 Change-Id: I9e84cfe85eeb9a1b8a97ca0595375ac26ba1bbfd Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1792905Reviewed-by:
Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Swapnil Gaikwad <swapnilgaikwad@google.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63704}
-
- 06 Sep, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Swapnil Gaikwad authored
This is a reland of 8b89a7c3 Reland after disabling the test getting deadlocked with '--gc_stress' flag. The CL was reverted because of the 'wasm/grow-shared-memory' test from the mjsunit test suite deadlocked for the 'gc_stress' variant. This is the known issue (v8:9221) and the deadlocking test is now disabled ( https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git/+/1c8981e3f4729b7a8220a8823e0a0d45f2a4b788). Original change's description: > Update GetIterator bytecode to load and call object[Symbol.iterator] > > The functionality of the GetIterator bytecode introduced previously is > now extended from loading the @@iterator property to calling the property > as well. This change basically absorbs the functionality of additional > two bytecodes - Star, CallProperty0 in the GetIterator bytecode. > Importantly, this change handles the cases of eager and lazy deoptimization > in the middle of the bytecode, i.e., lazy deopt for LdaNamedProperty and > eager deopt of the CallProperty0 bytecode, using the continuation builtins. > This mechanism can work as a template for the future bytecode that require > handling such inter-bytecode deopt scenario. The tests evaluating the eager > and lazy deopt scenarios are also included. > > Bug: v8:9489 > Change-Id: I93eb022bbc3d37582407820aa8482a343cac6c12 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1758313 > Commit-Queue: Swapnil Gaikwad <swapnilgaikwad@google.com> > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63528} Bug: v8:9489,v8:9221 Change-Id: I4286255aef457bfdbbe5eb50fc6dabdf9c0955b1 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1787427Reviewed-by:
Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Swapnil Gaikwad <swapnilgaikwad@google.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63599}
-
- 03 Sep, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Francis McCabe authored
This reverts commit 8b89a7c3. Reason for revert: GC Stress tests timing out. See https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20gc%20stress/24272 Original change's description: > Update GetIterator bytecode to load and call object[Symbol.iterator] > > The functionality of the GetIterator bytecode introduced previously is > now extended from loading the @@iterator property to calling the property > as well. This change basically absorbs the functionality of additional > two bytecodes - Star, CallProperty0 in the GetIterator bytecode. > Importantly, this change handles the cases of eager and lazy deoptimization > in the middle of the bytecode, i.e., lazy deopt for LdaNamedProperty and > eager deopt of the CallProperty0 bytecode, using the continuation builtins. > This mechanism can work as a template for the future bytecode that require > handling such inter-bytecode deopt scenario. The tests evaluating the eager > and lazy deopt scenarios are also included. > > Bug: v8:9489 > Change-Id: I93eb022bbc3d37582407820aa8482a343cac6c12 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1758313 > Commit-Queue: Swapnil Gaikwad <swapnilgaikwad@google.com> > Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63528} TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,leszeks@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,swapnilgaikwad@google.com Change-Id: I9ae475f71275f71f1b9e60b8bf0578e21ce2704b No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:9489 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1783736Reviewed-by:
Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63536}
-
Swapnil Gaikwad authored
The functionality of the GetIterator bytecode introduced previously is now extended from loading the @@iterator property to calling the property as well. This change basically absorbs the functionality of additional two bytecodes - Star, CallProperty0 in the GetIterator bytecode. Importantly, this change handles the cases of eager and lazy deoptimization in the middle of the bytecode, i.e., lazy deopt for LdaNamedProperty and eager deopt of the CallProperty0 bytecode, using the continuation builtins. This mechanism can work as a template for the future bytecode that require handling such inter-bytecode deopt scenario. The tests evaluating the eager and lazy deopt scenarios are also included. Bug: v8:9489 Change-Id: I93eb022bbc3d37582407820aa8482a343cac6c12 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1758313 Commit-Queue: Swapnil Gaikwad <swapnilgaikwad@google.com> Reviewed-by:
Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63528}
-