Consistently use InspectorTest.runAsyncTestSuite() in wasm inspector
tests to make tests easier to debug (they'll fail instead of timing
out in case of errors).

Bug: chromium:1162229, chromium:1071432
Change-Id: I7aada196f9e34071aa1bb059bb45f85f75226060
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2609414
Commit-Queue: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#71908}

It makes inspector tests a lot more readable if the opcode of the pause
location is being printed. Since we already have a list of all opcodes
available in wasm-module-builder.js, we can just reuse that to build a
reverse lookup map.

This CL implements this for single-byte opcodes only, which is enough
for all tests that we currently have. It will have to be extended for
prefixed opcodes once that is being used.

R=thibaudm@chromium.org, kimanh@chromium.org

Change-Id: I085fea99d2f5f2dc6cc084448e5f7444cce5c78b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2474789
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Kim-Anh Tran <kimanh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70578}

... at function start. Otherwise we run into a position mismatch:
In a non-flooded function, we add the function-entry breakpoint (for
"hook on function call") with the position of the first opcode.
In the flooded function though, we skip that special breakpoint because
we will stop at the first instruction anyway. But then the first
instruction is non-breakable, so we don't actually emit a breakpoint for
it.
Hence during OSR we do not find a corresponding position in the new
code.

This CL fixes this by postponing the function-entry breakpoint until the
first breakable opcode is found, and only emits it if that position does
not have a breakpoint anyway.
This way, we can also move the handling for function-entry breakpoints
from {StartFunctionBody} to {EmitDebuggingInfo}, where it fits much
better.

R=thibaudm@chromium.org

Bug: chromium:1137710
Change-Id: Idfa658fa0897cca89ba5ee3066cd414f68864d06
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2474774Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70529}