Skip to content

V
V8
Switch branch/tag
  1. 13 Jul, 2015 1 commit
  3. 04 May, 2015 1 commit
  5. 23 Apr, 2015 1 commit
  7. 15 Apr, 2015 2 commits
  9. 10 Apr, 2015 1 commit
  11. 08 Apr, 2015 1 commit
  13. 07 Apr, 2015 2 commits
  15. 24 Mar, 2015 1 commit
  17. 10 Mar, 2015 2 commits
    • loislo's avatar
      CpuProfiler: enable tests except four failing tests. · 84e90b2d
      loislo authored 
      Four tests are failing due to a problem with no frame ranges.

BUG=
LOG=n

Committed: https://crrev.com/2be160e726f2be6272b77e53fbd556aded6024f1
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27035}

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/976203003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27116}
      84e90b2d
    • loislo's avatar
      CpuProfiler: fix for CollectDeoptEvents test on arm64 · 82e6824e
      loislo authored 
      We use slightly different schema for JumpTable on arm64 than for x64.

We do a branch (B) to the JumpTable from the code,
then a branch (B) to the end of jump table code
and then branch to the deoptimizer code with putting
the return address into lr register (Call which is actually Blr).

As a result the 'from' address in Deoptimizer always points to
the end of JumpTable code and we can get nothing from this information.

0) I moved save_doubles and needs_frame code out of for_loop.

1) I replaced B commands with Bl so we put different return addresses
to lr register for the different jump table entries and replaced
the final Call with Br which do not touch lr register.

Also I removed the last_entry check so we will always do the Bl
even for the last entry because we need the right address in lr.
I don't think that this will affect the performance because it
just one more branch for entire deopt mechanics.

BUG=chromium:452067
LOG=n

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/984893003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27094}
      82e6824e
  19. 09 Mar, 2015 1 commit
    • loislo's avatar
      CpuProfiler: fix for GetDeoptReason code. · 66ab309e
      loislo authored 
      The original code always returned the first entry from RelocInfo that matched with
bailout_id. But we may have a few different deopt reasons for one bailout_id.
So we need to get the one which matches with a particular call from JumpTable.

We can do this by checking not 'target_address' (it maps to bailout_id)
but 'from' address which maps to a particular JumpTable entry.

The test was reworked so it tests identical functions against different reasons.

BUG=chromium:452067
LOG=n

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/984773003

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27076}
      66ab309e
  21. 06 Mar, 2015 2 commits
  23. 05 Mar, 2015 1 commit
  25. 19 Feb, 2015 1 commit
  27. 12 Feb, 2015 3 commits
    • loislo's avatar
      CPUProfiler: Push deopt reason further to ProfileNode. · d23ab23b
      loislo authored 
      1) create beefy RelocInfo table when cpu profiler is active, so if a function
was optimized when profiler was active RelocInfo would get separate DeoptInfo
for the each deopt case.

2) push DeoptInfo from CodeEntry to ProfileNode.
When deopt happens we put the info collected on #1 into CodeEntry and record stack sample.
On the sampling thread we grab the deopt data and append it to the corresponding ProfileNode deopts list.

Sample profile dump.
[Top down]:
    0  (root) 0 #1
    1     29 #2
    1      test 29 #3
    2        opt_function 29 #4
    2          opt_function 29 #5
                   deopted at 118 with reason 'not a heap number'
                   deopted at 137 with reason 'division by zero'

BUG=452067
LOG=n

Committed: https://crrev.com/ce8701b247d3c6604f24f17a90c02d17b4417f54
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26615}

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/919953002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26630}
      d23ab23b
    • loislo's avatar
      Revert of CPUProfiler: Push deopt reason further to ProfileNode. (patchset #1... · cb6ea146
      loislo authored 
      Revert of CPUProfiler: Push deopt reason further to ProfileNode. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/919953002/)

Reason for revert:
static initializers broke the build

Original issue's description:
> CPUProfiler: Push deopt reason further to ProfileNode.
>
> 1) create beefy RelocInfo table when cpu profiler is active, so if a function
> was optimized when profiler was active RelocInfo would get separate DeoptInfo
> for the each deopt case.
>
> 2) push DeoptInfo from CodeEntry to ProfileNode.
> When deopt happens we put the info collected on #1 into CodeEntry and record stack sample.
> On the sampling thread we grab the deopt data and append it to the corresponding ProfileNode deopts list.
>
> Sample profile dump.
> [Top down]:
>     0  (root) 0 #1
>     1     29 #2
>     5      test 29 #3
>     3        opt_function 29 #4
>                  deopted at 52 with reason 'not a heap number'
>                  deopted at 71 with reason 'division by zero'
>
> BUG=452067
> LOG=n
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/ce8701b247d3c6604f24f17a90c02d17b4417f54
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26615}

TBR=jarin@chromium.org,svenpanne@chromium.org,yurys@chromium.org,alph@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=452067

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/915173005

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26616}
      cb6ea146
    • loislo's avatar
      CPUProfiler: Push deopt reason further to ProfileNode. · ce8701b2
      loislo authored 
      1) create beefy RelocInfo table when cpu profiler is active, so if a function
was optimized when profiler was active RelocInfo would get separate DeoptInfo
for the each deopt case.

2) push DeoptInfo from CodeEntry to ProfileNode.
When deopt happens we put the info collected on #1 into CodeEntry and record stack sample.
On the sampling thread we grab the deopt data and append it to the corresponding ProfileNode deopts list.

Sample profile dump.
[Top down]:
    0  (root) 0 #1
    1     29 #2
    5      test 29 #3
    3        opt_function 29 #4
                 deopted at 52 with reason 'not a heap number'
                 deopted at 71 with reason 'division by zero'

BUG=452067
LOG=n

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/919953002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26615}
      ce8701b2
  29. 10 Feb, 2015 1 commit
    • loislo's avatar
      Propagate DeoptInfo to cpu-profiler · 86cae163
      loislo authored 
      1) Deoptimizer::Reason was replaced with Deoptimizer::DeoptInfo
because it also has raw position. Also the old name clashes with DeoptReason enum.

2) c_entry_fp assignment call was added to EntryGenerator::Generate
So we can calculate sp and have a chance to record the stack for the deopting function.
btw it makes the test stable.

3) new kind of CodeEvents was added to cpu-profiler

4) GetDeoptInfo method was extracted from PrintDeoptLocation.
So it could be reused in cpu profiler.

BUG=452067
LOG=n

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/910773002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26545}
      86cae163
  31. 06 Feb, 2015 1 commit
  33. 30 Jan, 2015 4 commits
  35. 06 Nov, 2014 1 commit
    • svenpanne@chromium.org's avatar
      The idea behind of this solution is to use the existing "relocation info"... · d56a21eb
      svenpanne@chromium.org authored 
      The idea behind of this solution is to use the existing "relocation info" instead of consumption the CodeLinePosition events emitted by the V8 compilers.
During generation code and relocation info are generated simultaneously.
When code generation is done you each code object has associated "relocation info".
Relocation information lets V8 to mark interesting places in the generated code: the pointers that might need to be relocated (after garbage collection),
correspondences between the machine program counter and source locations for stack walking.

This patch:
1. Add more source positions info in reloc info to make it suitable for source level mapping.
The amount of data should not be increased dramatically because (1) V8 already marks interesting places in the generated code and
(2) V8 does not write redundant information (it writes a pair (pc_offset, pos) only if pos is changed and skips other).
I measured it on Octane benchmark - for unoptimized code the number of source positions may achieve 2x ('lin_solve' from NavierStokes benchmark).

2. When a sample happens, CPU profiler finds a code object by pc, then use its reloc info to match the sample to a source line.
If a source line is found that hit counter is increased by one for this line.

3. Add a new public V8 API to get the hit source lines by CDT CPU profiler.
Note that it's expected a minor patch in Blink to pack the source level info in JSON to be shown.

4.Add a test that checks how the samples are distributed through source lines.
It tests two cases: (1) relocation info created during code generation and (2) relocation info associated with precompiled function's version.

Patch from Denis Pravdin <denis.pravdin@intel.com>;

R=svenpanne@chromium.org, yurys@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/682143003

Patch from Weiliang <weiliang.lin@intel.com>.

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25182}
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@25182 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
      d56a21eb
  37. 02 Oct, 2014 2 commits
    • yurys@chromium.org's avatar
      Revert of Extend CPU profiler with mapping ticks to source lines (patchset #3... · 08c40baa
      yurys@chromium.org authored 
      Revert of Extend CPU profiler with mapping ticks to source lines (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/616963005/)

Reason for revert:
It broke layout test fast/events/window-onerror-02.html, error column reported by window.onerror is now wrong (I believe it is because of the change in full-codegen):

http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8-Blink%20Linux%2064%20%28dbg%29/builds/652

Original issue's description:
> Extend CPU profiler with mapping ticks to source lines
>
> The idea behind of this solution is to use the existing "relocation info" instead of consumption the CodeLinePosition events emitted by the V8 compilers.
> During generation code and relocation info are generated simultaneously.
> When code generation is done you each code object has associated "relocation info".
> Relocation information lets V8 to mark interesting places in the generated code: the pointers that might need to be relocated (after garbage collection),
> correspondences between the machine program counter and source locations for stack walking.
>
> This patch:
> 1. Add more source positions info in reloc info to make it suitable for source level mapping.
> The amount of data should not be increased dramatically because (1) V8 already marks interesting places in the generated code and
> (2) V8 does not write redundant information (it writes a pair (pc_offset, pos) only if pos is changed and skips other).
> I measured it on Octane benchmark - for unoptimized code the number of source positions may achieve 2x ('lin_solve' from NavierStokes benchmark).
>
> 2. When a sample happens, CPU profiler finds a code object by pc, then use its reloc info to match the sample to a source line.
> If a source line is found that hit counter is increased by one for this line.
>
> 3. Add a new public V8 API to get the hit source lines by CDT CPU profiler.
> Note that it's expected a minor patch in Blink to pack the source level info in JSON to be shown.
>
> 4.Add a test that checks how the samples are distributed through source lines.
> It tests two cases: (1) relocation info created during code generation and (2) relocation info associated with precompiled function's version.
>
> Patch from Denis Pravdin <denis.pravdin@intel.com>
> BUG=None
> LOG=Y
> R=svenpanne@chromium.org
>
> Committed: https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=24389

TBR=svenpanne@chromium.org,danno@chromium.org,alph@chromium.org,denis.pravdin@intel.com,weiliang.lin@intel.com
BUG=None
LOG=N

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/624443005

git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@24394 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
      08c40baa
    • yurys@chromium.org's avatar
      Extend CPU profiler with mapping ticks to source lines · 6482fb3e
      yurys@chromium.org authored 
      The idea behind of this solution is to use the existing "relocation info" instead of consumption the CodeLinePosition events emitted by the V8 compilers.
During generation code and relocation info are generated simultaneously.
When code generation is done you each code object has associated "relocation info".
Relocation information lets V8 to mark interesting places in the generated code: the pointers that might need to be relocated (after garbage collection),
correspondences between the machine program counter and source locations for stack walking.

This patch:
1. Add more source positions info in reloc info to make it suitable for source level mapping.
The amount of data should not be increased dramatically because (1) V8 already marks interesting places in the generated code and
(2) V8 does not write redundant information (it writes a pair (pc_offset, pos) only if pos is changed and skips other).
I measured it on Octane benchmark - for unoptimized code the number of source positions may achieve 2x ('lin_solve' from NavierStokes benchmark).

2. When a sample happens, CPU profiler finds a code object by pc, then use its reloc info to match the sample to a source line.
If a source line is found that hit counter is increased by one for this line.

3. Add a new public V8 API to get the hit source lines by CDT CPU profiler.
Note that it's expected a minor patch in Blink to pack the source level info in JSON to be shown.

4.Add a test that checks how the samples are distributed through source lines.
It tests two cases: (1) relocation info created during code generation and (2) relocation info associated with precompiled function's version.

Patch from Denis Pravdin <denis.pravdin@intel.com>
BUG=None
LOG=Y
R=svenpanne@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/616963005

Patch from Denis Pravdin <denis.pravdin@intel.com>.

git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@24389 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
      6482fb3e
  39. 26 Aug, 2014 1 commit
  41. 05 Aug, 2014 1 commit
  43. 11 Jul, 2014 1 commit
  45. 01 Jul, 2014 1 commit
  47. 30 Jun, 2014 1 commit
  49. 24 Jun, 2014 1 commit
  51. 13 Jun, 2014 1 commit
  53. 05 Jun, 2014 1 commit
  55. 03 Jun, 2014 1 commit
  57. 22 May, 2014 1 commit
  59. 08 May, 2014 1 commit