Skip to content

V
V8
Switch branch/tag
  1. 04 Aug, 2022 1 commit
  3. 03 Aug, 2022 1 commit
  5. 29 Jul, 2022 1 commit
  7. 14 Jun, 2022 1 commit
  9. 10 Jun, 2022 1 commit
  11. 02 May, 2022 1 commit
    • jameslahm's avatar
      [sampler] Fix data race in Sampler::DoSample · 6e586b48
      jameslahm authored 
      In Sampler::DoSample, we only guard SignalHandler::Installed before
and Sampler::Stop may happen at the same time, which may cause SIGPROF
signal handler was already restored before SIGPROF was emit and trigger
profiling timer expired. This CL changes Sampler::DoSample to use
SignalHandler::mutex() to guard the entire function and also change
the mutex to recursive mutex.

Bug: v8:12838
Change-Id: I5195742ecdbade342986755233840d7be5d83c62
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3616429Reviewed-by: 's avatarCamillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: 王澳 <wangao.james@bytedance.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#80308}
      6e586b48
  13. 18 Feb, 2022 1 commit
  15. 22 Nov, 2021 1 commit
  17. 24 Aug, 2021 1 commit
    • Dan Elphick's avatar
      Reland "[include] Split out v8.h" · ec06bb6c
      Dan Elphick authored 
      This is a reland of d1b27019

Fixes include:
Adding missing file to bazel build
Forward-declaring classing before friend-classing them to fix win/gcc
Add missing v8-isolate.h include for vtune builds

Original change's description:
> [include] Split out v8.h
>
> This moves every single class/function out of include/v8.h into a
> separate header in include/, which v8.h then includes so that
> externally nothing appears to have changed.
>
> Every include of v8.h from inside v8 has been changed to a more
> fine-grained include.
>
> Previously inline functions defined at the bottom of v8.h would call
> private non-inline functions in the V8 class. Since that class is now
> in v8-initialization.h and is rarely included (as that would create
> dependency cycles), this is not possible and so those methods have been
> moved out of the V8 class into the namespace v8::api_internal.
>
> None of the previous files in include/ now #include v8.h, which means
> if embedders were relying on this transitive dependency then it will
> give compile failures.
>
> v8-inspector.h does depend on v8-scripts.h for the time being to ensure
> that Chrome continue to compile but that change will be reverted once
> those transitive #includes in chrome are changed to include it directly.
>
> Full design:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rTD--I8hCAr-Rho1WTumZzFKaDpEp0IJ8ejZtk4nJdA/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Bug: v8:11965
> Change-Id: I53b84b29581632710edc80eb11f819c2097a2877
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3097448
> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76424}

Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_vtunejit
Bug: v8:11965
Change-Id: I99f5d3a73bf8fe25b650adfaf9567dc4e44a09e6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3113629Reviewed-by: 's avatarLeszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarCamillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarMichael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarJakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarSimon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76460}
      ec06bb6c
  19. 23 Aug, 2021 2 commits
    • Dan Elphick's avatar
      Revert "[include] Split out v8.h" · 44fe02ce
      Dan Elphick authored 
      This reverts commit d1b27019.

Reason for revert: Broke vtune build, tsan build and possibly others

Original change's description:
> [include] Split out v8.h
>
> This moves every single class/function out of include/v8.h into a
> separate header in include/, which v8.h then includes so that
> externally nothing appears to have changed.
>
> Every include of v8.h from inside v8 has been changed to a more
> fine-grained include.
>
> Previously inline functions defined at the bottom of v8.h would call
> private non-inline functions in the V8 class. Since that class is now
> in v8-initialization.h and is rarely included (as that would create
> dependency cycles), this is not possible and so those methods have been
> moved out of the V8 class into the namespace v8::api_internal.
>
> None of the previous files in include/ now #include v8.h, which means
> if embedders were relying on this transitive dependency then it will
> give compile failures.
>
> v8-inspector.h does depend on v8-scripts.h for the time being to ensure
> that Chrome continue to compile but that change will be reverted once
> those transitive #includes in chrome are changed to include it directly.
>
> Full design:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rTD--I8hCAr-Rho1WTumZzFKaDpEp0IJ8ejZtk4nJdA/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Bug: v8:11965
> Change-Id: I53b84b29581632710edc80eb11f819c2097a2877
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3097448
> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76424}

Bug: v8:11965
Change-Id: Id57313ae992e720c8b19abc975cd69729e1344aa
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3113627
Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Owners-Override: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76428}
      44fe02ce
    • Dan Elphick's avatar
      [include] Split out v8.h · d1b27019
      Dan Elphick authored 
      This moves every single class/function out of include/v8.h into a
separate header in include/, which v8.h then includes so that
externally nothing appears to have changed.

Every include of v8.h from inside v8 has been changed to a more
fine-grained include.

Previously inline functions defined at the bottom of v8.h would call
private non-inline functions in the V8 class. Since that class is now
in v8-initialization.h and is rarely included (as that would create
dependency cycles), this is not possible and so those methods have been
moved out of the V8 class into the namespace v8::api_internal.

None of the previous files in include/ now #include v8.h, which means
if embedders were relying on this transitive dependency then it will
give compile failures.

v8-inspector.h does depend on v8-scripts.h for the time being to ensure
that Chrome continue to compile but that change will be reverted once
those transitive #includes in chrome are changed to include it directly.

Full design:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rTD--I8hCAr-Rho1WTumZzFKaDpEp0IJ8ejZtk4nJdA/edit?usp=sharing

Bug: v8:11965
Change-Id: I53b84b29581632710edc80eb11f819c2097a2877
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3097448Reviewed-by: 's avatarYang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarCamillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarJakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarLeszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarMichael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76424}
      d1b27019
  21. 16 Aug, 2021 1 commit
  23. 03 Aug, 2021 1 commit
    • Bruce Dawson's avatar
      Remove windows.h from win32-headers.h · fb9e1299
      Bruce Dawson authored 
      Windows.h causes massive namespace pollution with its defining of many
macros, it adds to build times, it disables warnings, and it makes it
easier to write non-portable code.

This change removes windows.h from V8's win32-headers.h. It does this
by replicating the small number of typedefs that are needed and by
defining three "proxy" types that are the same size and layout. The
V8ToWindowsType functions are used to reinterpret_cast between the
types.

Prior to this change there were over 760 v8-related source files that
include windows.h. After this change there are 16.

Bug: chromium:796644
Change-Id: I89efeed47028faae72de2da4f1dae345d8d7746c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3042215
Commit-Queue: Bruce Dawson <brucedawson@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarHannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarLeszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#76064}
      fb9e1299
  25. 22 Jun, 2021 1 commit
  27. 25 Feb, 2021 1 commit
  29. 09 Feb, 2021 1 commit
  31. 03 Dec, 2020 1 commit
  33. 25 Nov, 2020 1 commit
  35. 28 Oct, 2020 1 commit
  37. 20 Oct, 2020 1 commit
  39. 16 Sep, 2020 1 commit
    • Alex Kodat's avatar
      [cpu-profiler] Ensure sampled thread has Isolate lock under Windows · 76217f57
      Alex Kodat authored 
      While the sampler checked if the sampled thread had the Isolate locked
(if locks are being used) under Linux, the check was not done under
Windows (or Fuchsia) which meant that in a multi-threading application
under Windows, thread locking was not checked making it prone to seg
faults and the like as the profiler would be using isolate->js_entry_sp
to determine the stack to walk but isolate->js_entry_sp is the stack
pointer for the thread that currently has the Isolate lock so, if the
sampled thread does not have the lock, the sampler woud be iterating
over the wrong stack, one that might actually be actively changing on
another thread. The fix was to move the lock check into CpuSampler
and Ticker (--prof) so all OSes would do the correct check.

The basic concept is that on all operating systems a CpuProfiler, and
so its corresponding CpuCampler, the profiler is tied to a thread.
This is not based on first principles or anything, it's simply the
way it works in V8, though it is a useful conceit as it makes
visualization and interpretation of profile data much easier.

To collect a sample on a thread associated with a profiler the thread
must be stopped for obvious reasons -- walking the stack of a running
thread is a formula for disaster. The mechanism for stopping a thread
is OS-specific and is done in sample.cc. There are currently three
basic approaches, one for Linux/Unix variants, one for Windows and one
for Fuchsia. The approaches vary as to which thread actually collects
the sample -- under Linux the sample is actually collected on the
(interrupted) sampled thread whereas under Fuchsia/Windows it's on
a separate thread.

However, in a multi-threaded environment (where Locker is used), it's
not sufficient for the sampled thread to be stopped. Because the stack
walk involves looking in the Isolate heap, no other thread can be
messing with the heap while the sample is collected. The only ways to
ensure this would be to either stop all threads whenever collecting a
sample, or to ensure that the thread being sampled holds the Isolate
lock so prevents other threads from messing with the heap. While there
might be something to be said for the "stop all threads" approach, the
current approach in V8 is to only stop the sampled thread so, if in a
multi-threaded environment, the profiler must check if the thread being
sampled holds the Isolate lock.

Since this check must be done, independent of which thread the sample
is being collected on (since it varies from OS to OS), the approach is
to save the thread id of the thread to be profiled/sampled when the
CpuSampler is instantiated (on all OSes it is instantiated on the
sampled thread) and then check that thread id against the Isolate lock
holder thread id before collecting a sample. If it matches, we know
sample.cc has stop the sampled thread, one way or another, and we know
that no other thread can mess with the heap (since the stopped thread
holds the Isolate lock) so it's safe to walk the stack and collect data
from the heap so the sample can be taken. It it doesn't match, we can't
safely collect the sample so we don't.

Bug: v8:10850
Change-Id: Iba6cabcd3e11a19c261c004103e37e806934dc6f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2411343Reviewed-by: 's avatarPeter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69952}
      76217f57
  41. 01 Sep, 2020 2 commits
    • Peter Marshall's avatar
      [cpu-profiler] Add stats to track missing or unnattributed frames · ca6675ed
      Peter Marshall authored 
      This adds a global counter for the various reasons we might fail to
attribute a tick.

The counters are cleared and printed when Profile::Print() is called,
which we call in our tests, so flaky test output will now contain these
stats along with the printed profile tree.

Drive-by cleanup some print functions and make them const.

Change-Id: Ia3a27405f5b5346adfdbb32afc7e414857969cc5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1550406
Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarClemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69647}
      ca6675ed
    • Peter Marshall's avatar
      Revert "[cpu-profiler] Ensure sampled thread has Isolate lock under Windows" · 32435062
      Peter Marshall authored 
      This reverts commit dfb3f7da.

Reason for revert: Breaks LSAN & ASAN flakily: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=10861

Original change's description:
> [cpu-profiler] Ensure sampled thread has Isolate lock under Windows
> 
> While the sampler checked if the sampled thread had the Isolate locked
> (if locks are being used) under Linux, the check was not done under
> Windows (or Fuchsia) which meant that in a multi-threading application
> under Windows, thread locking was not checked making it prone to seg
> faults and the like as the profiler would be extracting info from a
> heap in motion. The fix was to move the lock check into CpuSampler
> and Ticker (--prof) so all OSes would do the correct check.
> 
> The basic concept is that on all operating systems a CpuProfiler, and
> so its corresponding CpuCampler, the profiler is tied to a thread.
> This is not based on first principles or anything, it's simply the
> way it works in V8, though it is a useful conceit as it makes
> visualization and interpretation of profile data much easier.
> 
> To collect a sample on a thread associated with a profiler the thread
> must be stopped for obvious reasons -- walking the stack of a running
> thread is a formula for disaster. The mechanism for stopping a thread
> is OS-specific and is done in sample.cc. There are currently three
> basic approaches, one for Linux/Unix variants, one for Windows and one
> for Fuchsia. The approaches vary as to which thread actually collects
> the sample -- under Linux the sample is actually collected on the
> (interrupted) sampled thread whereas under Fuchsia/Windows it's on
> a separate thread.
> 
> However, in a multi-threaded environment (where Locker is used), it's
> not sufficient for the sampled thread to be stopped. Because the stack
> walk involves looking in the Isolate heap, no other thread can be
> messing with the heap while the sample is collected. The only ways to
> ensure this would be to either stop all threads whenever collecting a
> sample, or to ensure that the thread being sampled holds the Isolate
> lock so prevents other threads from messing with the heap. While there
> might be something to be said for the "stop all threads" approach, the
> current approach in V8 is to only stop the sampled thread so, if in a
> multi-threaded environment, the profiler must check if the thread being
> sampled holds the Isolate lock.
> 
> Since this check must be done, independent of which thread the sample
> is being collected on (since it varies from OS to OS), the approach is
> to save the thread id of the thread to be profiled/sampled when the
> CpuSampler is instantiated (on all OSes it is instantiated on the
> sampled thread) and then check that thread id against the Isolate lock
> holder thread id before collecting a sample. If it matches, we know
> sample.cc has stop the sampled thread, one way or another, and we know
> that no other thread can mess with the heap (since the stopped thread
> holds the Isolate lock) so it's safe to walk the stack and collect data
> from the heap so the sample can be taken. It it doesn't match, we can't
> safely collect the sample so we don't.
> 
> Bug: v8:10850
> Change-Id: Iab2493130b9328430d7e5f5d3cf90ad6d10b1892
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2377108
> Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69623}

TBR=akodat@rocketsoftware.com,petermarshall@chromium.org,petermarshall@google.com

Change-Id: Ib6b6dc4ce109d5aa4e504fa7c9769f5cd95ddd0c
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: v8:10850
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2387570Reviewed-by: 's avatarPeter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69638}
      32435062
  43. 31 Aug, 2020 1 commit
    • Alex Kodat's avatar
      [cpu-profiler] Ensure sampled thread has Isolate lock under Windows · dfb3f7da
      Alex Kodat authored 
      While the sampler checked if the sampled thread had the Isolate locked
(if locks are being used) under Linux, the check was not done under
Windows (or Fuchsia) which meant that in a multi-threading application
under Windows, thread locking was not checked making it prone to seg
faults and the like as the profiler would be extracting info from a
heap in motion. The fix was to move the lock check into CpuSampler
and Ticker (--prof) so all OSes would do the correct check.

The basic concept is that on all operating systems a CpuProfiler, and
so its corresponding CpuCampler, the profiler is tied to a thread.
This is not based on first principles or anything, it's simply the
way it works in V8, though it is a useful conceit as it makes
visualization and interpretation of profile data much easier.

To collect a sample on a thread associated with a profiler the thread
must be stopped for obvious reasons -- walking the stack of a running
thread is a formula for disaster. The mechanism for stopping a thread
is OS-specific and is done in sample.cc. There are currently three
basic approaches, one for Linux/Unix variants, one for Windows and one
for Fuchsia. The approaches vary as to which thread actually collects
the sample -- under Linux the sample is actually collected on the
(interrupted) sampled thread whereas under Fuchsia/Windows it's on
a separate thread.

However, in a multi-threaded environment (where Locker is used), it's
not sufficient for the sampled thread to be stopped. Because the stack
walk involves looking in the Isolate heap, no other thread can be
messing with the heap while the sample is collected. The only ways to
ensure this would be to either stop all threads whenever collecting a
sample, or to ensure that the thread being sampled holds the Isolate
lock so prevents other threads from messing with the heap. While there
might be something to be said for the "stop all threads" approach, the
current approach in V8 is to only stop the sampled thread so, if in a
multi-threaded environment, the profiler must check if the thread being
sampled holds the Isolate lock.

Since this check must be done, independent of which thread the sample
is being collected on (since it varies from OS to OS), the approach is
to save the thread id of the thread to be profiled/sampled when the
CpuSampler is instantiated (on all OSes it is instantiated on the
sampled thread) and then check that thread id against the Isolate lock
holder thread id before collecting a sample. If it matches, we know
sample.cc has stop the sampled thread, one way or another, and we know
that no other thread can mess with the heap (since the stopped thread
holds the Isolate lock) so it's safe to walk the stack and collect data
from the heap so the sample can be taken. It it doesn't match, we can't
safely collect the sample so we don't.

Bug: v8:10850
Change-Id: Iab2493130b9328430d7e5f5d3cf90ad6d10b1892
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2377108Reviewed-by: 's avatarPeter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69623}
      dfb3f7da
  45. 29 Jun, 2020 1 commit
  47. 09 Jun, 2020 1 commit
  49. 21 Feb, 2020 1 commit
  51. 28 Nov, 2019 1 commit
  53. 13 Sep, 2019 1 commit
  55. 10 Sep, 2019 1 commit
  57. 30 May, 2019 1 commit
  59. 28 May, 2019 1 commit
  61. 27 May, 2019 1 commit
    • Clemens Hammacher's avatar
      [cleanup] Replace simple typedefs by using · a335f2ae
      Clemens Hammacher authored 
      This replaces all typedefs that define types and not functions by the
equivalent "using" declaration.

This was done mostly automatically using this command:
ag -l '\btypedef\b' src test | xargs -L1 \
     perl -i -p0e 's/typedef ([^*;{}]+) (\w+);/using \2 = \1;/sg'

Patchset 2 then adds some manual changes for typedefs for pointer types,
where the regular expression did not match.

R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
TBR=yangguo@chromium.org, jarin@chromium.org

Bug: v8:9183
Change-Id: I6f6ee28d1793b7ac34a58f980b94babc21874b78
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1631409
Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarMichael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#61849}
      a335f2ae
  63. 17 May, 2019 1 commit
  65. 02 May, 2019 1 commit
  67. 24 Apr, 2019 1 commit
  69. 17 Apr, 2019 2 commits
  71. 27 Mar, 2019 1 commit
  73. 14 Feb, 2019 1 commit