Skip to content

V
V8
Switch branch/tag
  1. 14 Mar, 2017 1 commit
  3. 13 Mar, 2017 3 commits
    • eholk's avatar
      [wasm] Initial signal handler · 118c376f
      eholk authored 
      This is basically the minimum viable signal handler for Wasm bounds checks.
It includes the TLS check and the fine grained instructions checks. These
two checks provide most of the safety for the signal handler. Future CLs will
add code range and data range checks for more robustness.

The trap handling code and data structures are all in src/trap-handler, with
the code that actually runs in the signal handler confined to
src/trap-handler/signal-handler.cc.

This changes adds a new V8 API that the embedder should call from a signal
handler that will give V8 the chance to handle the fault first. For hosts that
do not want to implement their own signal handler, we include the option to
install a simple one. This simple handler is also used for the tests.

When a Wasm module is instantiated, information about each function is passed
to the trap handler, which is used to classify faults. These are removed during
the instance finalizer.

Several future enhancements are planned before turning this on by default.
Obviously, the additional checks will be added to MaybeHandleFault. We are
also planning to add a two-level CodeObjectData table that is grouped by
isolates to make cleanup easier and also reduce potential for contending on
a single data structure.

BUG= https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=5277

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2371833007
Cr-Original-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43523}
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/a5af7fe9ee388a636675f4a6872b1d34fa7d1a7a
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2371833007
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43755}
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/338622d7cae787a63cece1f2e79a8b030023940b
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2371833007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43759}
      118c376f
    • eholk's avatar
      Revert of [wasm] Initial signal handler (patchset #60 id:1170001 of... · aba151b9
      eholk authored 
      Revert of [wasm] Initial signal handler (patchset #60 id:1170001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2371833007/ )

Reason for revert:
ASAN breakage, such as https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64%20ASAN/builds/19111/steps/Check/logs/grow-memory

Original issue's description:
> [wasm] Initial signal handler
>
> This is basically the minimum viable signal handler for Wasm bounds checks.
> It includes the TLS check and the fine grained instructions checks. These
> two checks provide most of the safety for the signal handler. Future CLs will
> add code range and data range checks for more robustness.
>
> The trap handling code and data structures are all in src/trap-handler, with
> the code that actually runs in the signal handler confined to
> src/trap-handler/signal-handler.cc.
>
> This changes adds a new V8 API that the embedder should call from a signal
> handler that will give V8 the chance to handle the fault first. For hosts that
> do not want to implement their own signal handler, we include the option to
> install a simple one. This simple handler is also used for the tests.
>
> When a Wasm module is instantiated, information about each function is passed
> to the trap handler, which is used to classify faults. These are removed during
> the instance finalizer.
>
> Several future enhancements are planned before turning this on by default.
> Obviously, the additional checks will be added to MaybeHandleFault. We are
> also planning to add a two-level CodeObjectData table that is grouped by
> isolates to make cleanup easier and also reduce potential for contending on
> a single data structure.
>
> BUG= https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=5277
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2371833007
> Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43523}
> Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/a5af7fe9ee388a636675f4a6872b1d34fa7d1a7a
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2371833007
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43755}
> Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/338622d7cae787a63cece1f2e79a8b030023940b

TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,bradnelson@google.com,hpayer@chromium.org,jochen@chromium.org,mark@chromium.org,mseaborn@chromium.org,titzer@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG= https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=5277

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2744383002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43757}
      aba151b9
    • eholk's avatar
      [wasm] Initial signal handler · 338622d7
      eholk authored 
      This is basically the minimum viable signal handler for Wasm bounds checks.
It includes the TLS check and the fine grained instructions checks. These
two checks provide most of the safety for the signal handler. Future CLs will
add code range and data range checks for more robustness.

The trap handling code and data structures are all in src/trap-handler, with
the code that actually runs in the signal handler confined to
src/trap-handler/signal-handler.cc.

This changes adds a new V8 API that the embedder should call from a signal
handler that will give V8 the chance to handle the fault first. For hosts that
do not want to implement their own signal handler, we include the option to
install a simple one. This simple handler is also used for the tests.

When a Wasm module is instantiated, information about each function is passed
to the trap handler, which is used to classify faults. These are removed during
the instance finalizer.

Several future enhancements are planned before turning this on by default.
Obviously, the additional checks will be added to MaybeHandleFault. We are
also planning to add a two-level CodeObjectData table that is grouped by
isolates to make cleanup easier and also reduce potential for contending on
a single data structure.

BUG= https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=5277

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2371833007
Cr-Original-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43523}
Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/a5af7fe9ee388a636675f4a6872b1d34fa7d1a7a
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2371833007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43755}
      338622d7
  5. 10 Mar, 2017 1 commit
  7. 09 Mar, 2017 1 commit
  9. 07 Mar, 2017 1 commit
  11. 06 Mar, 2017 1 commit
  13. 02 Mar, 2017 2 commits
  15. 01 Mar, 2017 2 commits
    • bmeurer's avatar
      Revert of [wasm] Initial signal handler (patchset #56 id:1090001 of... · 0b3e554e
      bmeurer authored 
      Revert of [wasm] Initial signal handler (patchset #56 id:1090001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2371833007/ )

Reason for revert:
Breaks tree, i.e. https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64%20ASAN/builds/18928/steps/Check/logs/grow-memory

Original issue's description:
> [wasm] Initial signal handler
>
> This is basically the minimum viable signal handler for Wasm bounds checks.
> It includes the TLS check and the fine grained instructions checks. These
> two checks provide most of the safety for the signal handler. Future CLs will
> add code range and data range checks for more robustness.
>
> The trap handling code and data structures are all in src/trap-handler, with
> the code that actually runs in the signal handler confined to
> src/trap-handler/signal-handler.cc.
>
> This changes adds a new V8 API that the embedder should call from a signal
> handler that will give V8 the chance to handle the fault first. For hosts that
> do not want to implement their own signal handler, we include the option to
> install a simple one. This simple handler is also used for the tests.
>
> When a Wasm module is instantiated, information about each function is passed
> to the trap handler, which is used to classify faults. These are removed during
> the instance finalizer.
>
> Several future enhancements are planned before turning this on by default.
> Obviously, the additional checks will be added to MaybeHandleFault. We are
> also planning to add a two-level CodeObjectData table that is grouped by
> isolates to make cleanup easier and also reduce potential for contending on
> a single data structure.
>
> BUG= https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=5277
>
> Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2371833007
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43523}
> Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+/a5af7fe9ee388a636675f4a6872b1d34fa7d1a7a

TBR=ahaas@chromium.org,bradnelson@google.com,hpayer@chromium.org,jochen@chromium.org,mark@chromium.org,mseaborn@chromium.org,titzer@chromium.org,eholk@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG= https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=5277

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2723133003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43525}
      0b3e554e
    • eholk's avatar
      [wasm] Initial signal handler · a5af7fe9
      eholk authored 
      This is basically the minimum viable signal handler for Wasm bounds checks.
It includes the TLS check and the fine grained instructions checks. These
two checks provide most of the safety for the signal handler. Future CLs will
add code range and data range checks for more robustness.

The trap handling code and data structures are all in src/trap-handler, with
the code that actually runs in the signal handler confined to
src/trap-handler/signal-handler.cc.

This changes adds a new V8 API that the embedder should call from a signal
handler that will give V8 the chance to handle the fault first. For hosts that
do not want to implement their own signal handler, we include the option to
install a simple one. This simple handler is also used for the tests.

When a Wasm module is instantiated, information about each function is passed
to the trap handler, which is used to classify faults. These are removed during
the instance finalizer.

Several future enhancements are planned before turning this on by default.
Obviously, the additional checks will be added to MaybeHandleFault. We are
also planning to add a two-level CodeObjectData table that is grouped by
isolates to make cleanup easier and also reduce potential for contending on
a single data structure.

BUG= https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=5277

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2371833007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43523}
      a5af7fe9
  17. 28 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  19. 27 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  21. 24 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  23. 21 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  25. 20 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  27. 18 Feb, 2017 1 commit
    • mtrofin's avatar
      [wasm] Embedder can control what buffers wasm compilation works on. · d9bc0ffb
      mtrofin authored 
      Two controls, one for instantiation and one for compilation. They allow
the embedder (e.g. Chrome) check properties of the parameters of those
two operations, and decide if they are allowed to continue.

For example, Chrome may now decline compilation of certain size buffers,
in synchronous cases; same for instantiation (where the buffer size
refers to the size of the buffer containing wasm wire bytes)

BUG=v8:5981

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2699843003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43295}
      d9bc0ffb
  29. 17 Feb, 2017 2 commits
  31. 15 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  33. 14 Feb, 2017 2 commits
  35. 13 Feb, 2017 4 commits
  37. 11 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  39. 08 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  41. 07 Feb, 2017 1 commit
    • raphael.kubo.da.costa's avatar
      Expose more %ArrayPrototype% functions to the public API. · e7b78ac2
      raphael.kubo.da.costa authored 
      In addition to Array.prototype.values() which is already exposed, Blink
needs access to entries(), forEach() and keys() to properly set the
corresponding functions in value iterators for WebIDL conformance.

Add a few new entries to NATIVE_CONTEXT_IMPORTED_FIELDS and expand
V8_INTRINSICS_LIST, as well as some API tests for all these new exposed
functions.

BUG=chromium:632935
R=caitp@igalia.com,jochen@chromium.org,verwaest@chromium.org,yukishiino@chromium.org

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2670833008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43017}
      e7b78ac2
  43. 06 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  45. 02 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  47. 27 Jan, 2017 3 commits
  49. 25 Jan, 2017 1 commit
  51. 23 Jan, 2017 2 commits
  53. 21 Jan, 2017 2 commits