Commit 848379c3 authored by Benedikt Meurer's avatar Benedikt Meurer Committed by Commit Bot

[cleanup] Remove obsolete comment.

The introduction of the FeedbackVector solved the problem of
inconsistent feedback between ICs in unoptimized and optimized
code.

Bug: v8:2029, v8:9183
Tbr: jkummerow@chromium.org
Change-Id: Id61033c1661e5a2efb740988552de76f7f148d0d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1649566Reviewed-by: 's avatarBenedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#62065}
parent 92c6af8a
...@@ -368,9 +368,6 @@ void IC::OnFeedbackChanged(Isolate* isolate, FeedbackVector vector, ...@@ -368,9 +368,6 @@ void IC::OnFeedbackChanged(Isolate* isolate, FeedbackVector vector,
#endif #endif
isolate->runtime_profiler()->NotifyICChanged(); isolate->runtime_profiler()->NotifyICChanged();
// TODO(2029): When an optimized function is patched, it would
// be nice to propagate the corresponding type information to its
// unoptimized version for the benefit of later inlining.
} }
static bool MigrateDeprecated(Handle<Object> object) { static bool MigrateDeprecated(Handle<Object> object) {
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment