If a value dies in deferred code, there is no need to reload it at the
end of the deferred code, as it will be dead in the non-deferred code
that follows in control flow order. In the linearized view of register
allocation, this is encoded as a lifetime gap (or the end of an
interval).

Moreover, this may lead to wrong assignments if the value dies
between two deferred blocks and we leave a non-splintered live
range in the middle of deferred code.

Bug: chromium:915975
Change-Id: Iec68fe86f0dfbbac612635a637f3239475906d14
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1433784
Commit-Queue: Stephan Herhut <herhut@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#59068}