A test was overflowing on the progress counter when using int as type.
This CL is fixing the progress counter to use uint32_t, and re-enables
the test.

Why uint32_t instead of size_t?
In the referenced bug, the progress_counter_ (but not the
progress_total_) triggered an overflow; and since these two counters
should be relatively similar (the total count is an estimate, and can
be less than the actual progress count), we do not expect the
count to increase much more than we can already encode with int.


Bug: chromium:1246860
Change-Id: I9769884ef60d352b3787c2223e528ddf33b0b23e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3245116
Commit-Queue: Kim-Anh Tran <kimanh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77551}