-
Sigurd Schneider authored
This fixes a bug where coverage for the inline script <script>function foo() {}<script> started to get deterministically reported as covered after crrev.com/c/1771776, while before it, we most of the time reported it as uncovered (depending on heap order of SFIs). The correct result is to report `foo` as uncovered as it is never called. The problem arose from the fact that v8:9212 needed to handle extra-wrappers around scripts correctly. Those wrappers have the same source range as the wrapped script and a call count of zero even if the wrapped script is executed. To filter them out, we previously determined nesting for identical source ranges by ascending call count. However, in the script case above, the script has call count one, while `foo` (which has the same source range) has call count zero. In this case, nesting is decreasing order of call counts. This CL is a minimal change that sorts SFIs which are top-level to the front, only then considers call counts in descending order. This preserves the behavior that node's extra wrappers are sorted to the front (and then filtered out by existing logic), but also ensures that for the example above, we report the script's coverage before the coverage for `foo`. Bug: v8:9857, v9:9212 Change-Id: Id224b0d8f12028b1f586ee5039e126bb5b8d8d36 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1863197Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64307}
0d7889d0