-
Seth Brenith authored
I removed the padding field because I couldn't see a reason why we would want to pad to system pointer size. I'm guessing that the intent was to pad to tagged pointer size, which was once relevant but isn't anymore since one of the int32 fields got removed. Bug: v8:8952 Change-Id: Ic191d783efd8d686f6920e6e7ce2d3dacba883c5 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1776847Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Seth Brenith <seth.brenith@microsoft.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63556}
e4e86b53