-
Nico Weber authored
`a && b` only evaluates b if a is true. `a & b` always evaluates both a and b. If a and b are of type bool, `&&` is usually what you want, so clang now warns on `&` where both arguments are of type bool. This warning fires twice in v8. 1. In branch-elimination.cc, we have the rare case where we _want_ to evaluate both branches so that both reduced_ and node_conditions_ are always updated. To make this more obvious, reorder the code a bit. (The warning can also be suppressed by casting one of the two expressions to int, but the reordering seems clearer.) 2. The other case is an actual (inconsequential) typo, so use || here. Bug: chromium:1255745 Change-Id: I62ba45451ee2642265574d28c646d85f5a18670b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3212891 Auto-Submit: Nico Weber <thakis@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77314}
bc4ea5e0