Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
F
ffmpeg.wasm-core
Project
Project
Details
Activity
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Linshizhi
ffmpeg.wasm-core
Commits
dd597cd7
Commit
dd597cd7
authored
Apr 17, 2007
by
Michael Niedermayer
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
patch submission checklist
Originally committed as revision 8745 to
svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk
parent
b092d033
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
47 additions
and
0 deletions
+47
-0
ffmpeg-doc.texi
doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi
+47
-0
No files found.
doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi
View file @
dd597cd7
...
@@ -1623,6 +1623,53 @@ and has no lrint()')
...
@@ -1623,6 +1623,53 @@ and has no lrint()')
Also please if you send several patches, send each patch as seperate mail,
Also please if you send several patches, send each patch as seperate mail,
dont attach several unrelated patches to the same mail.
dont attach several unrelated patches to the same mail.
@section patch submission checklist
@enumerate
@item
Do the regression tests pass with the patch applied?
@item
Is the patch a unified diff?
@item
Is the patch against latest ffmpeg SVN?
@item
Are you subscribed to ffmpeg-dev?
(the list is subscribers only due to spam)
@item
Have you checked that the changes are minimal, so that the same cannot be
achived with a smaller patch and/or simpler final code?
@item
If the change is to speed critical code did you benchmark it?
@item
Have you checked that the patch does not intruduce buffer overflows or
other security issues?
@item
Is the patch made from the root of the source, so it can be applied with -p0?
@item
Does the patch not mix functional and cosmetic changes?
@item
Is the patch attached to the email you send?
@item
Is the mime type of the patch correct? (not application/octet-stream)
@item
If the patch fixes a bug did you provide a verbose analysis of the bug?
@item
If the patch fixes a bug did you provide enough information including
a sample, so the bug can be reproduced and the fix can be verified?
@item
Did you provide a verbose summary about what the patch does change?
@item
Did you provide a verbose explanation why it changes things like it does?
@item
Did you provide a verbose summary of the user vissible advantages and
disadvantages if the patch is applied?
@item
Did you provide an example so we can verify the new feature added by the
patch easily?
@item
If you did any benchmarks, did you provide them in the mail?
@end enumerate
@section Patch review process
@section Patch review process
All patches posted to ffmpeg-devel will be reviewed, unless they contain a
All patches posted to ffmpeg-devel will be reviewed, unless they contain a
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment