-
Seth Brenith authored
This change is based on a discussion from https://crrev.com/c/v8/v8/+/2053769/4/src/compiler/machine-operator-reducer.cc#1696 wherein Tobias suggested moving the folding away of ==0 operations out of the platform-specific instruction selectors and into the MachineOperatorReducer. I noticed that CommonOperatorReducer already handles some very similar cases, so I have tried putting the ==0 folding into CommonOperatorReducer instead. I'm happy to move it into MachineOperatorReducer if that's better; I still don't have a very good understanding of how roles are separated among reducers. Change-Id: Ia0285bd9fafeef29d87cc88654bd6d355d467e8f Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2076498 Commit-Queue: Seth Brenith <seth.brenith@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66688}
0c72c719
Name |
Last commit
|
Last update |
---|---|---|
.. | ||
code-generator-mips64.cc | ||
instruction-codes-mips64.h | ||
instruction-scheduler-mips64.cc | ||
instruction-selector-mips64.cc |