Skip to content

V
V8
Switch branch/tag
  1. 16 May, 2016 2 commits
  3. 15 May, 2016 1 commit
    • v8-autoroll's avatar
      Update V8 DEPS. · 862406e7
      v8-autoroll authored 
      Rolling v8/build to d4fdf55ba8b19ee50d864162c343fd1939d00fe7

Rolling v8/buildtools to 06e80a0e17319868d4a9b13f9bb6a248dc8d8b20

TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,vogelheim@chromium.org,hablich@chromium.org

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1977243002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36258}
      862406e7
  5. 14 May, 2016 2 commits
  7. 13 May, 2016 33 commits
  9. 12 May, 2016 2 commits
    • vogelheim's avatar
      Remove Expression::bounds_, in order to conserve memory during parsing. · bb04e124
      vogelheim authored 
      Expression::bounds_ is used only by a subset of compile passes, but the
data structure occupies space for every Expression node ever parsed. This
unneccessarily increases memory consumption. Particularly, peak memory
consumption during startup, which may cause out-of-memory errors.

This CL
- removes Expression::bounds_;
- introduces an AstTypeBounds container, which mappes Expression* to Bounds;
- modifies the code that actually requires bounds information, namely
  Crankshaft compile and AsmWasmBuilder, to instantiate such an AstTypeBounds
  container before typing and to pass it to the code that consumes this
  information; and
- modifies all accesses to Expression::bounds_ to instead access the bounds
  via the container instead.

Additionally, this rewrites test-ast-expression-visitor. The reason is that
this code attempted to test AstExpressionVisitor but did so exclusively
through its subclass ExpressionTypeCollector, meaning that the test dealt
almost exclusively with type bounds despite the class-under-test having
no knowledge or functionality related to it. Worse, the test was written
in a way to assume that type bounds were available outside & after
compilation, which is something this change changes.

BUG=v8:4947

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1968383002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36222}
      bb04e124
    • jwolfe's avatar
      In parallel to the strict octal check that would reject `012` in strict mode,... · d0b6686c
      jwolfe authored 
      In parallel to the strict octal check that would reject `012` in strict mode, this patch collects UseCounters for `089` in strict mode. The spec says this should be an error, but this patch does not report it as such.

BUG=v8:4973
LOG=y

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1948403002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36221}
      d0b6686c