Skip to content

V
V8
Switch branch/tag
  1. 16 Dec, 2020 2 commits
    • Daniel Clark's avatar
      [modules][api] Implement HostGetSupportedImportAssertions · 8ae4dc40
      Daniel Clark authored 
      Implement the HostGetSupportedImportAssertions, whose purpose
is to filter the list of import assertions exposed to the embedder to
only those assertion with keys that the embedder recognizes. See
https://tc39.es/proposal-import-assertions/#sec-hostgetsupportedimportassertions.

This change doesn't actually implement it as a callback, but instead
passes the supported assertions during creation of the Isolate via
CreateParams. This expresses clearly the requirement that the supported
assertions must never change for the lifetime of the Isolate.

Note that we still need to maintain all assertions in a map
while parsing the import assertions clause, because duplicate keys for
an unsupported assertion still needs to be detected as a parse error. So,
the filtering is done later during
SourceTextModuleDescriptor::AstModuleRequest::Serialize.

The actual filtering algorithm simply iterates the assertions and the
supported assertion keys in a nested loop. There's currently only one
assertion in use ("type"), so there should be no reason to get too
clever here unless at least several more assertions are generally
supported.

Bug: v8:10958
Change-Id: I9a2d965e9d452718d0ddfe9dca55b7b4ed963019
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2572173Reviewed-by: 's avatarMarja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarAdam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: 's avatarCamillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Clark <daniec@microsoft.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#71776}
      8ae4dc40
    • Zhi An Ng's avatar
      [wasm-simd][x64] Fix definition of Shufps · 5f4b0e47
      Zhi An Ng authored 
      The definition of Shufps is wrong, we are incorrectly passing 0 as the
immediate in all cases. No tests broke because we only used Shufps for
splats, which has imm8 == 0 anyway.

Also, it was using movss, which only moves a single 32-bit. Because we
were using it only for f32x4 splat, this ended up being enough (imm8 ==
0 meant that we only shuffled the low 32-bit). This is fixed to use
movaps, which moves the entire 128-bit register.

Also tweak the definition of Shufps to take 4 arguments. `vshufps dst,
src1, src2, imm8` shuffles src1 and src2 into dst. `shufps dst, src,
imm8`, shuffles dst and src into dst.

So `Shufps(dst, src, imm8)` is ambiguous in the AVX case, it could be:
1. vshufps(dst, src, src, imm8), or
2. vshufps(dst, dst, src, imm8)

2. is more likely to be the intended behavior, but it introduces a false
dependency on the value of dst.

With `Shufps(dst, src1, src2, imm8)`, it is clearer what the behavior
should be:
1. shufps(dst, src2, imm8) matches the AVX behavior IFF dst == src1.

Change-Id: I60dc4ec868023d28d00f2b09d2c53b82a729bc4d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2591849Reviewed-by: 's avatarClemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#71775}
      5f4b0e47
  3. 15 Dec, 2020 23 commits
  5. 14 Dec, 2020 15 commits