1. 25 Aug, 2017 1 commit
    • Jakob Gruber's avatar
      [regexp] Pass correct limit to Runtime::kRegExpSplit · c7a7bf6a
      Jakob Gruber authored
      The Uint32(limit) conversion can end up transitioning the regexp
      instance to slow mode. In this case we need to bail out to runtime while
      ensuring that ToUint32 is not observably called a second time. We do
      this by passing the already-converted value to runtime.
      
      This particular path was broken and we ended up passing the original
      maybe_limit value to runtime instead.
      
      TBR=yangguo@chromium.org
      
      Bug: chromium:758763
      Change-Id: If7f23b452d2e134ad9be3d4ef1d78d1c946fcef0
      Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/635588Reviewed-by: 's avatarJakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
      Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#47609}
      c7a7bf6a
  2. 25 Jul, 2017 1 commit
  3. 04 May, 2017 1 commit
  4. 02 May, 2017 1 commit
  5. 11 Apr, 2017 1 commit
    • gsathya's avatar
      [ESNext] Implement DynamicImportCall · 94283dcf
      gsathya authored
      This patch implements the runtime semantics of dynamic import.
      
      We create a new ASTNode so that we can pass the JSFunction closure() to
      the runtime function from which we get the script_url.
      
      d8 implements the embedder logic required to load and evaluate the modules.
      
      The API is mostly implemented as specified.
      
      BUG=8:5785
      
      Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2703563002
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44551}
      94283dcf
  6. 17 Feb, 2017 1 commit
    • vabr's avatar
      Report unexpected lexical decl also without destructuring · 454816f0
      vabr authored
      https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002/ introduced
      "SyntaxError: Lexical declaration cannot appear in a single-statement context"
      for the case when let + desctructuring from a list happen.
      
      As was pointed out in https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002/#msg18, the
      case without destructuring would also benefit from a better message: if a
      single statement is expected and "let identifier = ..." is seen, the error is
      indeed again that the lexical declaration is not a statement. However, the current
      error is "Unexpected identifier", because the parser tries to accept "let" as
      an identifier in an expression statement, and then gives up seeing the other
      identifier after "let".
      
      This CL ensures that the parser recognises the error properly and reports
      accordingly. It also renames the existing test, which contains destructuring,
      and adds the one with a non-destructuring lexical declaration.
      
      BUG=v8:5686
      
      Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2697193007
      Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43275}
      454816f0
  7. 16 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  8. 16 Jan, 2017 1 commit
  9. 12 Jan, 2017 1 commit
  10. 04 Jan, 2017 1 commit