- 09 Nov, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Clemens Hammacher authored
The flag is on by default, so we don't need to specify it. More importantly, the tests are expected to work for any value of that flag. So don't force the flag but use whatever the test variant chooses. Note that in streaming-compile.js, the flag was accidentally specified as '-async-compilation'. I also removed that one. R=ahaas@chromium.org Change-Id: Ifad31160d266dda38cdd9dd1d73dad69bd2c2f2c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1325961Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#57406}
-
- 15 Sep, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Andreas Haas authored
In this CL I implement streaming compilation for WebAssembly, as described in the design doc I have sent out already. In this implementation the decoding of sections other than the code section is done immediately on the foreground thread. Eventually all decoding should happen in the background. I think it is acceptable to do the decoding on the foreground thread for now because I have finished it already, and decoding in the background would add even more complexity to this CL. Bug:v8:6785 Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng Change-Id: I285e1e5e1a5a243113c92571b25ee9bae551d0ed Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/631721Reviewed-by: Mircea Trofin <mtrofin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48022}
-
- 11 Apr, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Caitlin Potter authored
Fix error message printed by Runtime_ThrowCalledNonCallable. As noted on the bug, this has a slight problem in that it will always print that "asyncIterator" was not callable for GetIterator with an async IteratorType, though it may be referring to a different call. This issue is present regardless of the change I introduced to perform this desugaring in the BytecodeGenerator. BUG=v8:6187 R=adamk@chromium.org, verwaest@chromium.org Change-Id: I2077b7cd5976d9d9ba044f0dff44ee8c312d1263 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/470806Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44543}
-
- 28 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Georg Neis authored
The order in which things were done wasn't quite correct and lead to wrong behaviour for certain circular module graphs. BUG=v8:1569,chromium:694566 Change-Id: I291186e261268c853a30ad891ff362904e0b28ef Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/447399Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43497}
-
- 17 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
vabr authored
https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002/ introduced "SyntaxError: Lexical declaration cannot appear in a single-statement context" for the case when let + desctructuring from a list happen. As was pointed out in https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002/#msg18, the case without destructuring would also benefit from a better message: if a single statement is expected and "let identifier = ..." is seen, the error is indeed again that the lexical declaration is not a statement. However, the current error is "Unexpected identifier", because the parser tries to accept "let" as an identifier in an expression statement, and then gives up seeing the other identifier after "let". This CL ensures that the parser recognises the error properly and reports accordingly. It also renames the existing test, which contains destructuring, and adds the one with a non-destructuring lexical declaration. BUG=v8:5686 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2697193007 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43275}
-
- 16 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
vabr authored
ES2017 forbids the sequence of tokens "let [" in in expression statements [1]. This CL makes ParserBase report those instances as SyntaxError. It also adds a customised error message for that, because the standard "Unexpected token" is not applicable: "let" itself is not forbidden in those context, only the sequence of "let [". [1] https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-expression-statement BUG=v8:5686 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43258}
-
- 16 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
yangguo authored
TBR=tebbi@chromium.org BUG=chromium:679841 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2631163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42375}
-
- 12 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
marja authored
The bug was caused by AstTraversalVisitor refactoring: https://codereview.chromium.org/2169833002/ InitializerRewriter::VisitRewritableExpression in parser.cc didn't recurse; so it fails when a rewritable expression contains another rewritable expression. See the bug for more details. BUG=chromium:679727 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2629623002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42274}
-
- 04 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
tebbi authored
R=bmeurer@chromium.org BUG=chromium:677757 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2606383005 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42066}
-