- 16 Sep, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jakob Kummerow authored
This reimplements the "--time" option of run-tests.py to print the 20 slowest tests, on top of json_test_results infrastructure just like the bots do it. Additionally this CL speeds up a bunch of slow tests. Bug: v8:9396 Change-Id: I40797d2c8c3bfdd310b72f15cd1a035844b7c6f3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1803635 Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63786}
-
- 13 Jul, 2016 1 commit
-
-
bakkot authored
Reland of Add errors for declarations which conflict with catch parameters. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2112223002/ ) Reason for revert: Correcting issue. Original issue's description: > Revert of Add errors for declarations which conflict with catch parameters. (patchset #6 id:100001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2109733003/ ) > > Reason for revert: > Fuzzer claims `try { \"\" ; } catch(x) { let x1 = [1,,], x = x; }` causes a crash. > > Original issue's description: > > Add errors for declarations which conflict with catch parameters. > > > > Catch parameters are largely treated as lexical declarations in the > > block which contains their body for the purposes of early syntax errors, > > with some exceptions outlined in B.3.5. This patch introduces most of > > those errors, except those from `eval('for (var e of ...);')` inside of > > a catch with a simple parameter named 'e'. > > > > Note that annex B.3.5 allows var declarations to conflict with simple > > catch parameters, except when the variable declaration is the init of a > > for-of statement. > > > > BUG=v8:5112,v8:4231 > > > > Committed: https://crrev.com/2907c726b2bb5cf20b2bec639ca9e6a521585406 > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37462} > > TBR=littledan@chromium.org > # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. > NOPRESUBMIT=true > NOTREECHECKS=true > NOTRY=true > BUG=v8:5112,v8:4231 > > Committed: https://crrev.com/8834d5ecb559001c87c42322969471da60574a8c > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37464} R=littledan@chromium.org BUG=v8:5112,v8:4231 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2119933002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37728}
-
- 01 Jul, 2016 2 commits
-
-
bakkot authored
Revert of Add errors for declarations which conflict with catch parameters. (patchset #6 id:100001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2109733003/ ) Reason for revert: Fuzzer claims `try { \"\" ; } catch(x) { let x1 = [1,,], x = x; }` causes a crash. Original issue's description: > Add errors for declarations which conflict with catch parameters. > > Catch parameters are largely treated as lexical declarations in the > block which contains their body for the purposes of early syntax errors, > with some exceptions outlined in B.3.5. This patch introduces most of > those errors, except those from `eval('for (var e of ...);')` inside of > a catch with a simple parameter named 'e'. > > Note that annex B.3.5 allows var declarations to conflict with simple > catch parameters, except when the variable declaration is the init of a > for-of statement. > > BUG=v8:5112,v8:4231 > > Committed: https://crrev.com/2907c726b2bb5cf20b2bec639ca9e6a521585406 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37462} TBR=littledan@chromium.org # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=v8:5112,v8:4231 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2112223002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37464}
-
bakkot authored
Catch parameters are largely treated as lexical declarations in the block which contains their body for the purposes of early syntax errors, with some exceptions outlined in B.3.5. This patch introduces most of those errors, except those from `eval('for (var e of ...);')` inside of a catch with a simple parameter named 'e'. Note that annex B.3.5 allows var declarations to conflict with simple catch parameters, except when the variable declaration is the init of a for-of statement. BUG=v8:5112,v8:4231 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2109733003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37462}
-
- 08 Apr, 2016 1 commit
-
-
adamk authored
These were all on by default in M49 without complaint. R=littledan@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1858943002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35342}
-
- 22 Mar, 2016 1 commit
-
-
adamk authored
Now that ES2015 const has shipped, in Chrome 49, legacy const declarations are no more. This lets us remove a bunch of code from many parts of the codebase. In this patch, I remove parser support for generating legacy const variables from const declarations. This also removes the special "illegal declaration" bit from Scope, which has ripples into all compiler backends. Also gone are any tests which relied on legacy const declarations. Note that we do still generate a Variable in mode CONST_LEGACY in one case: function name bindings in sloppy mode. The likely fix there is to add a new Variable::Kind for this case and handle it appropriately for stores in each backend, but I leave that for a later patch to make this one completely subtractive. Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1819123002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35002}
-
- 12 Aug, 2015 2 commits
-
-
littledan authored
This patch strengthens testing of classes by verifying that the binding that they export externally follows block scoping, as opposed to var-style scoping. The tests are based on existing tests for let and const. R=adamk LOG=N BUG=v8:3305 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1286923002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30140}
-
littledan authored
In an initial attempt to implement sloppy mode lexical bindings, functions were made lexically scoped in sloppy mode. However, the ES2015 spec says that they need an additional hoisted var binding, and further, it's not clear when we'll implement that behavior or whether it's web-compatible. This patch splits off function block scoping into a new, separate flag called --harmony_sloppy_function. This change will enable the possibility of testing and shipping this feature separately from other block scoping-related features which don't have the same risks. BUG=v8:4285 R=adamk LOG=N Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1282093002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30122}
-
- 11 Aug, 2015 1 commit
-
-
littledan authored
In ES6, direct eval() in sloppy mode uses the enclosing function-level ("var") scope for var-style bindings and a new lexical scope for lexical bindings like let and class. This patch implements that feature by making lexical bindings that are directly within an EVAL_SCOPE be on the local scope rather than the enclosing one. BUG=v8:4288 LOG=Y R=adamk Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1274193004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30120}
-
- 25 Jul, 2015 1 commit
-
-
littledan authored
--harmony_sloppy includes behavior to turn on sloppy mode lexical bindings. Before this patch, it also included a way to parse let which is likely web-incompatible (let is disallowed as an identifier). This patch splits off the let parsing from the more general block scoping code, so that block scoping can be developed independently. R=adamk LOG=N BUG=v8:3305 Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1255013002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29855}
-
- 10 Jul, 2015 1 commit
-
-
arv authored
We have to call CheckConflictingVarDeclarations in case we have enabled --harmony-sloppy BUG=v8:4287 LOG=N R=littledan@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1226103002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29578}
-
- 13 Mar, 2015 1 commit
-
-
dslomov authored
We have been shipping harmony scoping for 2 Chrome releases now (M41 and M42). Time to remove the flag. R=rossberg@chromium.org LOG=Y Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1007783002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27187}
-
- 25 Nov, 2014 1 commit
-
-
dslomov authored
R=rossberg@chromium.org BUG=v8:2858 LOG=N Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/748113003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25503}
-
- 09 Jul, 2014 1 commit
-
-
rossberg@chromium.org authored
R=ulan@chromium.org BUG=v8:3426 LOG=Y Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/377513006 git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@22298 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
-
- 17 Jun, 2014 1 commit
-
-
mstarzinger@chromium.org authored
R=ulan@chromium.org Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/338363002 git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@21877 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
-
- 28 Aug, 2012 1 commit
-
-
rossberg@chromium.org authored
- The global object has a reference to the current global scope chain. Running a script adds to the chain if it contains global lexical declarations. - Scripts are executed relative to a global, not a native context. - Harmony let and const bindings are allocated to the innermost global context; var and function still live on the global object. (Lexical bindings are not reflected on the global object at all, but that will probably change later using accessors, as for modules.) - Compilation of scripts now needs a (global) context (previously only eval did). - The global scope chain represents one logical scope, so collision tests take the chain into account. R=svenpanne@chromium.org BUG= Review URL: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10872084 git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@12398 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
-
- 14 Feb, 2012 1 commit
-
-
rossberg@chromium.org authored
R=ulan@chromium.org BUG=v8:1942 TEST= Review URL: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/9365054 git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@10698 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
-
- 24 Nov, 2011 1 commit
-
-
keuchel@chromium.org authored
This CL introduces a third mode next to the non-strict (henceforth called 'classic mode') and 'strict mode' which is called 'extended mode' as in the current ES.next specification drafts. The extended mode is based on the 'strict mode' and adds new functionality to it. This means that most of the semantics of these two modes coincide. The 'extended mode' is entered instead of the 'strict mode' during parsing when using the 'strict mode' directive "use strict" and when the the harmony-scoping flag is active. This should be changed once it is fully specified how the 'extended mode' is entered. This change introduces a new 3 valued enum LanguageMode (see globals.h) corresponding to the modes which is mostly used by the frontend code. This includes the following components: * (Pre)Parser * Compiler * SharedFunctionInfo, Scope and ScopeInfo * runtime functions: StoreContextSlot, ResolvePossiblyDirectEval, InitializeVarGlobal, DeclareGlobals The old enum StrictModeFlag is still used in the backend when the distinction between the 'strict mode' and the 'extended mode' does not matter. This includes: * SetProperty runtime function, Delete builtin * StoreIC and KeyedStoreIC * StubCache Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8417035 git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@10062 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
-
- 25 Oct, 2011 1 commit
-
-
keuchel@chromium.org authored
This implements block scoped 'const' declared variables in harmony mode. They have a temporal dead zone semantics similar to 'let' bindings, i.e. accessing uninitialized 'const' bindings in throws a ReferenceError. As for 'let' bindings, the semantics of 'const' bindings in global scope is not correctly implemented yet. Furthermore assignments to 'const's are silently ignored. Another CL will introduce treatment of those assignments as early errors. Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/7992005 git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@9764 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
-
- 12 Oct, 2011 1 commit
-
-
rossberg@chromium.org authored
Shorten --harmony-block-scoping to --harmony-scoping. R=keuchel@chromium.org BUG= TEST= Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/8226017 git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@9589 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
-
- 01 Sep, 2011 1 commit
-
-
keuchel@chromium.org authored
BUG= TEST=mjsunit/harmony/block-conflicts.js Review URL: http://codereview.chromium.org/7756014 git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@9102 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
-