- 22 Nov, 2017 1 commit
-
-
jgruber authored
These tests can take up to 10 minutes on bots. Split them up to increase parallelism. Bug: v8:7093 Change-Id: Iabfd34a7f2476d4add51da807f2e987e8d1153c9 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/785411Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#49573}
-
- 26 Oct, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Clemens Hammacher authored
This way, we can also check the return code of d8. We currently have a bug (6981) which makes failing tests not being detected, even though the failure message is (sometimes) being printed. After this refactoring, we can write tests for our mjsunit test functions. R=machenbach@chromium.org Bug: v8:6981 Change-Id: I0aa0abcb0f9a4f622a1e1d1a4d826da1e6eb4f07 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/737991Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48951}
-
- 11 Apr, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Caitlin Potter authored
Fix error message printed by Runtime_ThrowCalledNonCallable. As noted on the bug, this has a slight problem in that it will always print that "asyncIterator" was not callable for GetIterator with an async IteratorType, though it may be referring to a different call. This issue is present regardless of the change I introduced to perform this desugaring in the BytecodeGenerator. BUG=v8:6187 R=adamk@chromium.org, verwaest@chromium.org Change-Id: I2077b7cd5976d9d9ba044f0dff44ee8c312d1263 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/470806Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44543}
-
- 28 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Georg Neis authored
The order in which things were done wasn't quite correct and lead to wrong behaviour for certain circular module graphs. BUG=v8:1569,chromium:694566 Change-Id: I291186e261268c853a30ad891ff362904e0b28ef Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/447399Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43497}
-
- 17 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
vabr authored
https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002/ introduced "SyntaxError: Lexical declaration cannot appear in a single-statement context" for the case when let + desctructuring from a list happen. As was pointed out in https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002/#msg18, the case without destructuring would also benefit from a better message: if a single statement is expected and "let identifier = ..." is seen, the error is indeed again that the lexical declaration is not a statement. However, the current error is "Unexpected identifier", because the parser tries to accept "let" as an identifier in an expression statement, and then gives up seeing the other identifier after "let". This CL ensures that the parser recognises the error properly and reports accordingly. It also renames the existing test, which contains destructuring, and adds the one with a non-destructuring lexical declaration. BUG=v8:5686 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2697193007 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43275}
-
- 16 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
vabr authored
ES2017 forbids the sequence of tokens "let [" in in expression statements [1]. This CL makes ParserBase report those instances as SyntaxError. It also adds a customised error message for that, because the standard "Unexpected token" is not applicable: "let" itself is not forbidden in those context, only the sequence of "let [". [1] https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-expression-statement BUG=v8:5686 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43258}
-
- 16 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
yangguo authored
TBR=tebbi@chromium.org BUG=chromium:679841 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2631163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42375}
-
- 12 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
marja authored
The bug was caused by AstTraversalVisitor refactoring: https://codereview.chromium.org/2169833002/ InitializerRewriter::VisitRewritableExpression in parser.cc didn't recurse; so it fails when a rewritable expression contains another rewritable expression. See the bug for more details. BUG=chromium:679727 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2629623002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42274}
-
- 04 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
tebbi authored
R=bmeurer@chromium.org BUG=chromium:677757 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2606383005 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42066}
-