Even in unreachable code, the targets of br_table have to have matching
types.

R=thibaudm@chromium.org

Bug: v8:10556
Change-Id: I2e85df3cb92f7910a6bcb5ac03927c424194660d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2218062
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68148}

For exported functions that do not have a name yet, we use the field
name (see <name> of WasmExport) of the first export entry.

Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XoXWONLBgZWQ9dhtoMpQPvD0fnnWA50OorsuSXfME3g/edit#heading=h.6yuhg1v2w3q4
Bug: v8:10242
Change-Id: Icfa55fd50e5d1c4cf10581b7d322112e9f113388
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2112684
Commit-Queue: Z Nguyen-Huu <duongn@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Kim-Anh Tran <kimanh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66877}

There was a bug in the function body decoder where
type checking of brtable only happened if the brtable
instruction is reachable. However, type checking is
required in all cases where brtable "not unreachable".
The difference between reachable and "not unreachable"
is a state called spec-reachable where a clever
compiler can already infer that the code will be
unreachable (e.g. a memory access is out of bounds
just by the offset and therefore unconditionally
traps), but the spec can not. If an instruction is
only spec-reachable, it still has to be type checked.

R=clemensb@chromium.org
FIX=chromium:1046472

Change-Id: I7e9f1108597871615c0d443a0e94de35a0207b5e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2027990
Commit-Queue: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66049}