- 01 Jun, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Camillo Bruni authored
- Add d8.file.read() and d8.file.execute() helpers - Change tools and tests to use new d8.file helper - Unify error throwing in v8::Shell::ReadFile Change-Id: I5ef4cb27f217508a367106f01e872a4059d5e399 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2928505 Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#74883}
-
- 21 Apr, 2021 1 commit
-
-
Ng Zhi An authored
Bug: v8:10773 Change-Id: I2f2a828bea66c7547d988c6f4c36cbd48c7f85b0 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2842384 Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#74109}
-
- 18 Sep, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Tobias Tebbi authored
This is a reland of 2000aea5 Changes compared to last reland: - Add rule in variants.py for --enable_experimental_regexp_engine. - Make sure --abort-on-contradictory-flags works as well as --fuzzing to disable the checking for fuzzers, including for d8 flags. Original change's description: > Reland^4 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > This is a reland of 0ba115e6 > Changes compared to last reland: > - Fix Python code trying to write to expected_outcomes, which is now a > computed property. > - Fix remaining place in d8.cc that ignored the --fuzzing flag. > - Expect flag contradictions for --cache in code_serializer variant. > > Original change's description: > > Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > > > Changes: > > - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned. > > - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before. > > > > Original change's description: > > > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > > > > > This is a reland of d8f8a7e2 > > > Change compared to last reland: > > > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing > > > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=* > > > > > > Original change's description: > > > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > > > > > > > This is a reland of b8f91666 > > > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify > > > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used > > > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall. > > > > > > > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While > > > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long > > > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the > > > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean > > > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in > > > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like > > > > > > > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = { > > > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"], > > > > } > > > > > > > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice > > > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with > > > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies > > > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot. > > > > > > > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags > > > > for consistency. > > > > > > > > Original change's description: > > > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags > > > > > > > > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/ > > > > > > > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab > > > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792 > > > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > > > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168} > > > > > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341 > > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115 > > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989} > > > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276 > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464 > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339} > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng > > Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624 > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770 > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433} > > Change-Id: Ib6d2aeb495210f581ac671221c265df58e8e5e70 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2398640 > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69954} Bug: v8:10577 TBR: clemensb@chromium.org, tmrts@chromium.org Change-Id: Iab2d32cdcc2648934fc52255ccf3ae3ec9ca4d9b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2416386Reviewed-by:
Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#70000}
-
- 16 Sep, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Bill Budge authored
This reverts commit 2000aea5. Reason for revert: Breaks NumFuzz. Original change's description: > Reland^4 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > This is a reland of 0ba115e6 > Changes compared to last reland: > - Fix Python code trying to write to expected_outcomes, which is now a > computed property. > - Fix remaining place in d8.cc that ignored the --fuzzing flag. > - Expect flag contradictions for --cache in code_serializer variant. > > Original change's description: > > Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > > > Changes: > > - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned. > > - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before. > > > > Original change's description: > > > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > > > > > This is a reland of d8f8a7e2 > > > Change compared to last reland: > > > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing > > > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=* > > > > > > Original change's description: > > > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > > > > > > > This is a reland of b8f91666 > > > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify > > > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used > > > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall. > > > > > > > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While > > > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long > > > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the > > > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean > > > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in > > > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like > > > > > > > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = { > > > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"], > > > > } > > > > > > > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice > > > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with > > > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies > > > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot. > > > > > > > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags > > > > for consistency. > > > > > > > > Original change's description: > > > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags > > > > > > > > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/ > > > > > > > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab > > > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792 > > > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > > > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168} > > > > > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341 > > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115 > > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989} > > > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276 > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464 > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339} > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng > > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng > > Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624 > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770 > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433} > > Change-Id: Ib6d2aeb495210f581ac671221c265df58e8e5e70 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2398640 > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69954} TBR=clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org Change-Id: I2dc80bcad9f74c29298902e01939e7e7f3336cf6 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2415133Reviewed-by:
Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69959}
-
Tobias Tebbi authored
This is a reland of 0ba115e6 Changes compared to last reland: - Fix Python code trying to write to expected_outcomes, which is now a computed property. - Fix remaining place in d8.cc that ignored the --fuzzing flag. - Expect flag contradictions for --cache in code_serializer variant. Original change's description: > Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > Changes: > - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned. > - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before. > > Original change's description: > > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > > > This is a reland of d8f8a7e2 > > Change compared to last reland: > > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing > > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=* > > > > Original change's description: > > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > > > > > This is a reland of b8f91666 > > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify > > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used > > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall. > > > > > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While > > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long > > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the > > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean > > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in > > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like > > > > > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = { > > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"], > > > } > > > > > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice > > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with > > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies > > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot. > > > > > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags > > > for consistency. > > > > > > Original change's description: > > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags > > > > > > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/ > > > > > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab > > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792 > > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> > > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168} > > > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341 > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115 > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989} > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276 > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464 > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339} > > Bug: v8:10577 > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng > Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770 > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433} Change-Id: Ib6d2aeb495210f581ac671221c265df58e8e5e70 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2398640 Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69954}
-
- 17 Aug, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Francis McCabe authored
This reverts commit dc18b822. Reason for revert: still causing failures: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20debug/31566 Original change's description: > Reland^3 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > This is a reland of 0ba115e6 > Changes: > - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned. > - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before. > > Original change's description: > > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > > > This is a reland of d8f8a7e2 > > Change compared to last reland: > > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing > > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=* > > > > Original change's description: > > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > > > > > This is a reland of b8f91666 > > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify > > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used > > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall. > > > > > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While > > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long > > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the > > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean > > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in > > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like > > > > > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = { > > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"], > > > } > > > > > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice > > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with > > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies > > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot. > > > > > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags > > > for consistency. > > > > > > Original change's description: > > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags > > > > > > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/ > > > > > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab > > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792 > > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> > > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168} > > > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341 > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115 > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989} > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276 > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464 > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339} > > Bug: v8:10577 > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng > Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng > Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770 > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433} TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org Change-Id: I4ccdd7b931d0ddccbcec1d6cfae8d4874ee49cfc No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:10577 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2360414Reviewed-by:
Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Francis McCabe <fgm@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69438}
-
Tobias Tebbi authored
This is a reland of 0ba115e6 Changes: - Also allow second parameter influenced by --cache to be reassigned. - Fix --stress-opt to only --always-opt in the last iteration as before. Original change's description: > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > This is a reland of d8f8a7e2 > Change compared to last reland: > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=* > > Original change's description: > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > > > This is a reland of b8f91666 > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall. > > > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like > > > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = { > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"], > > } > > > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot. > > > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags > > for consistency. > > > > Original change's description: > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags > > > > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/ > > > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792 > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168} > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341 > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115 > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989} > > Bug: v8:10577 > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464 > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339} Bug: v8:10577 Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_rel_ng Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux64_tsan_isolates_rel_ng Change-Id: I4a69dc57a102782cb453144323e3752ac8278624 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2352770 Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69433}
-
- 11 Aug, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Bill Budge authored
This reverts commit 0ba115e6. Reason for revert: Breaks test on TSAN - block-conflicts https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux64%20TSAN%20-%20concurrent%20marking/14230 Original change's description: > Reland^2 "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > This is a reland of d8f8a7e2 > Change compared to last reland: > - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing > - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=* > > Original change's description: > > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > > > This is a reland of b8f91666 > > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify > > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used > > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall. > > > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While > > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long > > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the > > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean > > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in > > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like > > > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = { > > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"], > > } > > > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice > > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with > > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies > > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot. > > > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags > > for consistency. > > > > Original change's description: > > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags > > > > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/ > > > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab > > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792 > > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168} > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341 > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115 > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989} > > Bug: v8:10577 > Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464 > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339} TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org Change-Id: I1454a05e357ddd704db7fb79e51be65d45a9a16e No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:10577 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2348365Reviewed-by:
Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Bill Budge <bbudge@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69341}
-
Tobias Tebbi authored
This is a reland of d8f8a7e2 Change compared to last reland: - Do not check for d8 flag contradictions in the presence of --fuzzing - Allow identical re-declaration of --cache=* Original change's description: > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > This is a reland of b8f91666 > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall. > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = { > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"], > } > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot. > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags > for consistency. > > Original change's description: > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags > > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/ > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792 > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168} > > Bug: v8:10577 > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115 > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989} Bug: v8:10577 Change-Id: I31d2794d4f9ff630f3444210100c64d67d881276 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2339464 Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#69339}
-
- 22 Jul, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Maya Lekova authored
This reverts commit d8f8a7e2. Reason for revert: Breaks code_serializer variant - https://cr-buildbucket.appspot.com/build/8874070652992164976 Original change's description: > Reland "[flags] warn about contradictory flags" > > This is a reland of b8f91666 > Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify > incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used > to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall. > > This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While > explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long > as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the > presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean > flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in > variants.py. Otherwise a rule like > > INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = { > "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"], > } > > wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice > wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with > test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies > --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot. > > Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags > for consistency. > > Original change's description: > > [flags] warn about contradictory flags > > > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/ > > > > Bug: v8:10577 > > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab > > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792 > > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168} > > Bug: v8:10577 > Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115 > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989} TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org Change-Id: I7969065b0edbc463a94e530485bc2ab623d77b62 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:10577 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2312782Reviewed-by:
Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68992}
-
Tobias Tebbi authored
This is a reland of b8f91666 Difference to previous CL: Additional functionality to specify incompatible flags based on GN variables and extra-flags, used to fix the issues that came up on the waterfall. This also changes the rules regarding repeated flags: While explicitly repeated flags are allowed for boolean values as long as they are identical, repeated flags or explicit flags in the presence of an active implication are disallowed for non-boolean flags. The latter simplifies specifying conflict rules in variants.py. Otherwise a rule like INCOMPATIBLE_FLAGS_PER_EXTRA_FLAG = { "--gc-interval=*": ["--gc-interval=*"], } wouldn't work because specifying the same GC interval twice wouldn't actually count as a conflict. This was an issue with test/mjsunit/wasm/gc-buffer.js, which specifies --gc-interval=500 exactly like the extra flag by the stress bot. Also, this now expands contradictory flags checking to d8 flags for consistency. Original change's description: > [flags] warn about contradictory flags > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/ > > Bug: v8:10577 > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792 > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168} Bug: v8:10577 Change-Id: I268e590ee18a535b13dee14eeb15ddd0a9ee8341 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2235115 Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68989}
-
- 04 Jun, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Clemens Backes authored
This reverts commit b8f91666. Reason for revert: Fails gc-stress (https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux%20-%20gc%20stress/28341). Original change's description: > [flags] warn about contradictory flags > > Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/ > > Bug: v8:10577 > Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792 > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168} TBR=machenbach@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,clemensb@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,tmrts@chromium.org Change-Id: Ia1e3373fbb4c369594ceb98eb560e3ccf2cb8780 No-Presubmit: true No-Tree-Checks: true No-Try: true Bug: v8:10577 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2230523Reviewed-by:
Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68169}
-
Tobias Tebbi authored
Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lkvu8crkK7Ei39qjkPCFijpNyxWXsOktG9GB-7K34jM/ Bug: v8:10577 Change-Id: Ib9cfdffa401c48c895bf31caed5ee03545beddab Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2154792Reviewed-by:
Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Tamer Tas <tmrts@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#68168}
-
- 03 Feb, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Ng Zhi An authored
This relands commit 7c32fa05. Some test cases need to be updated, since we will bail out to TurboFan where previously Liftoff was happy to run, when SIMD is not supported. Original change's description: > [wasm-simd][liftoff] Check CpuFeatures for SIMD support > > If Wasm simd128 is not supported on this particular hardware, we bail > out to TurboFan. > > Bug: v8:9909 > Change-Id: Ie46e154426783ba099b7c0facc906670cda1bdd0 > Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2029427 > Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> > Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66055} Bug: v8:9909 Bug: v8:10169 Change-Id: I850e1fe6bfbd12fb2eec052aa8367624c09f7a08 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2030354 Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66090}
-
- 11 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Ng Zhi An authored
Increase the embedded vector size to 91 as that is the max size needed to print a s128 as a 32x4. - max value of uint32_t has 10 digits in decimal, 1 for a potential sign, 3 spaces in between 4 of them -> 3 + 4 * 11 = 47 - max value of uint32_t has 8 digits in hex, 3 spaces in between -> 3 + 4 * 8 = 35 - the prefix "v128:" -> 5 - " / " to separate the decimal and hex representation -> 3 - null byte 47 + 35 + 5 + 3 + 1 = 91 Bug: v8:9754 Change-Id: I153c30738fa8862b44fb5103cbe62ea0bcea9718 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1814885 Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Deepti Gandluri <gdeepti@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#64256}
-
- 29 Aug, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Ben L. Titzer authored
This CL makes the names of tracing flags related to WASM consistent with the rest of V8 tracing flags. R=ahaas@chromium.org Change-Id: I871fb7b5e27ff7b8f587e08507d15c0719881990 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1193182 Commit-Queue: Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#55479}
-
- 22 Jun, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Clemens Hammacher authored
Before flipping the flag, some tests need to be adapted. This CL prepares these tests, such that the flag flip CL really just flips a flag. R=titzer@chromium.org, hablich@chromium.org Bug: v8:6600, chromium:787421 Change-Id: I8030df69cda5f3fb81354350a37f65c0d1c669bd Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1110363Reviewed-by:
Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Michael Hablich <hablich@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#53959}
-
- 04 May, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Clemens Hammacher authored
In order to get more test coverage (also on ClusterFuzz), stage Liftoff and tier up behind --future. R=hablich@chromium.org CC=titzer@chromium.org Bug: v8:6600 Change-Id: I718e17957b26f60aa4c002333035f693344806e0 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/1042385Reviewed-by:
Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by:
Michael Hablich <hablich@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#52987}
-
- 17 Jan, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Clemens Hammacher authored
For memory tracing, output a 'T' for Turbofan code and an 'L' for Liftoff code. To do this, the WasmCodeWrapper now has some dispatch functions which work for both on-the-heap and off-the-heap code. We can probably refactor more code by having this mechanism. Since the output of --wasm-trace-memory differs now between Turbofan and Liftoff, the message test is split in two. R=titzer@chromium.org CC=mstarzinger@chromium.org Bug: v8:6600 Change-Id: Ic5fd18c631f5c8aaad19d639df75b18098895b5a Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/868214Reviewed-by:
Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#50655}
-
- 02 Oct, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Clemens Hammacher authored
With --wasm-trace-memory, both compiled code and the interpreter will output each memory load or store. This helps to debug miscompilations in emscripten or in V8, like the referenced bug. R=titzer@chromium.org Bug: chromium:718858 Change-Id: I90704d164975b11c65677f86947ab102242d5153 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/684316Reviewed-by:
Ben Titzer <titzer@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Clemens Hammacher <clemensh@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48255}
-
- 11 Apr, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Caitlin Potter authored
Fix error message printed by Runtime_ThrowCalledNonCallable. As noted on the bug, this has a slight problem in that it will always print that "asyncIterator" was not callable for GetIterator with an async IteratorType, though it may be referring to a different call. This issue is present regardless of the change I introduced to perform this desugaring in the BytecodeGenerator. BUG=v8:6187 R=adamk@chromium.org, verwaest@chromium.org Change-Id: I2077b7cd5976d9d9ba044f0dff44ee8c312d1263 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/470806Reviewed-by:
Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Caitlin Potter <caitp@igalia.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44543}
-
- 28 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Georg Neis authored
The order in which things were done wasn't quite correct and lead to wrong behaviour for certain circular module graphs. BUG=v8:1569,chromium:694566 Change-Id: I291186e261268c853a30ad891ff362904e0b28ef Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/447399Reviewed-by:
Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43497}
-
- 17 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
vabr authored
https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002/ introduced "SyntaxError: Lexical declaration cannot appear in a single-statement context" for the case when let + desctructuring from a list happen. As was pointed out in https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002/#msg18, the case without destructuring would also benefit from a better message: if a single statement is expected and "let identifier = ..." is seen, the error is indeed again that the lexical declaration is not a statement. However, the current error is "Unexpected identifier", because the parser tries to accept "let" as an identifier in an expression statement, and then gives up seeing the other identifier after "let". This CL ensures that the parser recognises the error properly and reports accordingly. It also renames the existing test, which contains destructuring, and adds the one with a non-destructuring lexical declaration. BUG=v8:5686 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2697193007 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43275}
-
- 16 Feb, 2017 1 commit
-
-
vabr authored
ES2017 forbids the sequence of tokens "let [" in in expression statements [1]. This CL makes ParserBase report those instances as SyntaxError. It also adds a customised error message for that, because the standard "Unexpected token" is not applicable: "let" itself is not forbidden in those context, only the sequence of "let [". [1] https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-expression-statement BUG=v8:5686 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2694003002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43258}
-
- 16 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
yangguo authored
TBR=tebbi@chromium.org BUG=chromium:679841 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2631163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42375}
-
- 12 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
marja authored
The bug was caused by AstTraversalVisitor refactoring: https://codereview.chromium.org/2169833002/ InitializerRewriter::VisitRewritableExpression in parser.cc didn't recurse; so it fails when a rewritable expression contains another rewritable expression. See the bug for more details. BUG=chromium:679727 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2629623002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42274}
-
- 04 Jan, 2017 1 commit
-
-
tebbi authored
R=bmeurer@chromium.org BUG=chromium:677757 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2606383005 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#42066}
-