Skip to content

V
V8
Switch branch/tag
  1. 15 Jul, 2015 3 commits
    • adamk's avatar
      [es6] JSObject::GetOwnElementKeys should collect String wrapper keys first · 1e146c07
      adamk authored 
      This makes Object.getOwnPropertyNames() return the integer keys in the
proper order, following the spec:

http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/#sec-ordinary-object-internal-methods-and-internal-slots-ownpropertykeys

BUG=v8:4118
LOG=n

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1228803006

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29667}
      1e146c07
    • bmeurer's avatar
      [handles] Sanitize Handle and friends. · d940c6d3
      bmeurer authored 
      Bunch of cleanups to allow us to get rid of handles-inl.h at some
point (in the not so far future); but more importantly to sanitize uses
of handles and prepare for handle canonicalization support.

R=yangguo@chromium.org

Committed: https://crrev.com/3283195d0408333cce552cf4087577e6f41054e5
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28222}

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1128533002

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29666}
      d940c6d3
    • littledan's avatar
      Optimize String.prototype.includes · d20a5090
      littledan authored 
      This patch removes the MathMax call from String.prototype.includes
in order to improve performance. With some quick and dirty benchmarking,
(test case courtesy of the node folks) a sizable performance gain is visible:

d8> function testIndexOf() { var stringArray = [ 'hello', 'world', '123', 'abc' ]; return stringArray.some(function(val, idx, arr) { return val.indexOf('world') !== -1 })}
d8> function testIncludes() { var stringArray = [ 'hello', 'world', '123', 'abc' ]; return stringArray.some(function(val, idx, arr) { return val.includes('world') })}
d8> function testTime(fn) { var before = Date.now(); fn(); return Date.now() - before; }
d8> testTime(function() { for (var i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { testIncludes() } })
2244
d8> testTime(function() { for (var i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { testIndexOf() } })
2212

Compare that to before the test, when the performance difference was much larger:

d8> testTime(function() { for (var i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { testIndexOf() } })
2223
d8> testTime(function() { for (var i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { testIncludes() } })
2650

In my runs, performance of both functions drifts up and down, but running them in quick
succession back and forth shows a roughly consistent delta of about this magnitude.

String.prototype.includes is still slightly (maybe 5%) slower than String.prototype.indexOf,
but the effect is significantly reduced.

R=adamk
BUG=v8:3807
LOG=Y

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1231673008

Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29665}
      d20a5090
  3. 14 Jul, 2015 37 commits