[refactor] Be explicit wrt. simple vs. detailed stack trace.
This is a non-functional refactoring to make naming of stack traces more consistent, and thus easier to reason about whether the "simple stack trace" (stack trace API) or the "detailed stack trace" (inspector API) is meant. Granted, these names aren't great by themselves, but at least we should be consistent. This also adds a new `Isolate::GetSimpleStackTrace()` and uses that directly to implement the Wasm C-API, avoiding the roundtrip via the `JSMessageObject`, which actually carries a detailed stack trace (which by chance worked out so far). Doc: https://bit.ly/v8-stack-frame Bug: chromium:1258599, chromium:1278647, chromium:1278650 Change-Id: I29e1a956ed156d6eeceb50150a28afaa2f11b9c7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3334780 Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78366}
Showing
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment