[interpreter] Make tick counter test code properly warm-up.

R=rmcilroy@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4680

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2282733002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#39163}

test/cctest/cctest.status

@@ -360,10 +360,6 @@
   # in interpreter.
   'test-heap/CompilationCacheCachingBehavior': [FAIL],
 
-  # BUG(rmcilroy,4680): Function is optimized without type feedback and so immediately deopts again, causing check failure in the test.
-  'test-heap/ResetSharedFunctionInfoCountersDuringIncrementalMarking': [FAIL],
-  'test-heap/ResetSharedFunctionInfoCountersDuringMarkSweep': [FAIL],
-
   # BUG(4680): Missing type feedback makes optimistic optimizations fail.
   'test-cpu-profiler/CollectDeoptEvents': [FAIL],
   'test-cpu-profiler/DeoptUntrackedFunction': [SKIP],
@@ -407,8 +403,6 @@
   'test-heap/OptimizedPretenuringNestedObjectLiterals': [FAIL],
   'test-heap/OptimizedPretenuringObjectArrayLiterals': [FAIL],
   'test-heap/Regress169209': [FAIL],
-  'test-heap/ResetSharedFunctionInfoCountersDuringIncrementalMarking': [FAIL],
-  'test-heap/ResetSharedFunctionInfoCountersDuringMarkSweep': [FAIL],
   'test-heap/TestCodeFlushing': [FAIL],
   'test-heap/TestCodeFlushingIncremental': [FAIL],
   'test-heap/TestCodeFlushingIncrementalScavenge': [FAIL],

test/cctest/heap/test-heap.cc

@@ -2716,6 +2716,8 @@ TEST(ResetSharedFunctionInfoCountersDuringIncrementalMarking) {
         "  return s;"
         "}"
         "f(); f();"
+        "%BaselineFunctionOnNextCall(f);"
+        "f(); f();"
         "%OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall(f);"
         "f();");
   }
@@ -2760,6 +2762,8 @@ TEST(ResetSharedFunctionInfoCountersDuringMarkSweep) {
         "  return s;"
         "}"
         "f(); f();"
+        "%BaselineFunctionOnNextCall(f);"
+        "f(); f();"
         "%OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall(f);"
         "f();");
   }