-
svenpanne@chromium.org authored
The underlying problem is that for compound/count operations we use the *load* type feedback for storing, too. For normal properties this doesn't matter, but for accessor properties we should better use the *store* type feedback, which would be available, too. This consistent feedback usage could be guaranteed if we removed the heavy copy-n-paste in the crankshaft code generation for compound/count operations and assignments/property loads. To be on the safe side, we postpone this refactoring and do a quick and easily mergeable fix. BUG=140083 TEST=mjsunit/regress/regress-crbug-140083.js Review URL: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10828146 git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@12252 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
83fc4205