• Benedikt Meurer's avatar
    [es2015] Optimize Object.is baseline and interesting cases. · d4da17c6
    Benedikt Meurer authored
    The Object.is builtin provides an entry point to the abstract operation
    SameValue, which properly distinguishes -0 and 0, and also identifies
    NaNs. Most of the time you don't need these, but rather just regular
    strict equality, but when you do, Object.is(o, -0) is the most readable
    way to check for minus zero.
    
    This is for example used in Node.js by formatNumber to properly print -0
    for negative zero. However since the builtin thus far implemented as C++
    builtin and TurboFan didn't know anything about it, Node.js considering
    to go with a more performant, less readable version (which also makes
    assumptions about the input value) in
    
      https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/15726
    
    until the performance of Object.is will be on par (so hopefully we can
    go back to Object.is in Node 9).
    
    This CL ports the baseline implementation of Object.is to CSA, which
    is pretty straight-forward since SameValue is already available in
    CodeStubAssembler, and inlines a few interesting cases into TurboFan,
    i.e. comparing same SSA node, and checking for -0 and NaN explicitly.
    
    On the micro-benchmarks we go from
    
      testNumberIsMinusZero: 1000 ms.
      testObjectIsMinusZero: 929 ms.
      testObjectIsNaN: 954 ms.
      testObjectIsSame: 793 ms.
      testStrictEqualSame: 104 ms.
    
    to
    
      testNumberIsMinusZero: 89 ms.
      testObjectIsMinusZero: 88 ms.
      testObjectIsNaN: 88 ms.
      testObjectIsSame: 86 ms.
      testStrictEqualSame: 105 ms.
    
    which is a nice 10x to 11x improvement and brings Object.is on par with
    strict equality for most cases.
    
    Drive-by-fix: Also refactor and optimize the SameValue check in the
    CodeStubAssembler to avoid code bloat (by not inlining StrictEqual
    into every user of SameValue, and also avoiding useless checks).
    
    Bug: v8:6882
    Change-Id: Ibffd8c36511f219fcce0d89ed4e1073f5d6c6344
    Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/700254Reviewed-by: 's avatarJaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
    Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
    Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#48275}
    d4da17c6
effect-control-linearizer.cc 121 KB