This reverts commit 352a154e.

Reason for revert: https://crbug.com/999972

Original change's description:
> [compiler] improve inlining heuristics: call frequency per executed bytecodes
> 
> TLDR: Inline less, but more where it matters. ~10% decrease in Turbofan
> compile time including off-thread, while improving Octane scores by ~2%.
> 
> How things used to work:
> 
> There is a flag FLAG_min_inlining_frequency that limits inlining by
> the callsite being sufficiently frequently executed. This call frequency
> was measured relative to invocations of the parent (= the function we
> originally optimize). At the same time, the limit was very low (0.15),
> meaning we mostly relied on the total amount of inlined code
> (FLAG_max_inlined_bytecode_size_cumulative) to limit inlining.
> 
> How things work now:
> 
> Instead of measuring call frequency relative to parent invocations, we
> should have a measure that predicts how often the callsite in question
> will be executed in the future. An obvious attempt at that would be to
> measure how often the callsite was executed in absolute numbers in the
> past. But depending on how fast feedback stabilizes, it can take more
> or less time until we optimize a function. If we just take the absolute
> call frequency up to the point in time when we optimize, we would
> inline more for functions that stabilize slowly, which doesn't make
> sense. So instead, we measure absolute call count per KB of executed
> bytecodes of the parent function.
> Since inlining big functions is more expensive, this threshold is
> additionally scaled linearly with the bytecode-size of the inlinee.
> The resulting formula is:
> call_frequency >
> FLAG_min_inlining_frequency *
>   (bytecode.length() - FLAG_max_inlined_bytecode_size_small) /
>   (FLAG_max_inlined_bytecode_size - FLAG_max_inlined_bytecode_size_small)
> 
> The new threshold is chosen in a way that it effectively limits
> inlining, which allows us to increase
> FLAG_max_inlined_bytecode_size_cumulative without increasing inlining
> in general.
> 
> The reduction in compile time (x64 build) of ~10% was observed in Octane,
> ARES-6, web-tooling-benchmark, and the standalone TypeScript benchmark.
> The hope is that this will reduce CPU-time in real-world situations
> too.
> The Octane improvements come from inlining more in places where it
> matters.
> 
> Bug: v8:6682
> 
> Change-Id: I99baa17dec85b71616a3ab3414d7e055beca39a0
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1768366
> Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Georg Neis <neis@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63449}

TBR=rmcilroy@chromium.org,neis@chromium.org,jgruber@chromium.org,tebbi@chromium.org,mslekova@chromium.org

# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.

Bug: v8:6682 chromium:999972
Change-Id: Iffca63d4bef81afa0f66e34d35fb72f3b5baf517
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1784281Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#63554}