Commit d1ac8e10 authored by Philip Langdale's avatar Philip Langdale Committed by Michael Niedermayer

CrystalHD: Improve detection of field pair -> two fields content.

Istvan Sebok provided a sample where field pair -> two fields content
was being misdetected by the existing logic. I added an additional
test to check the input picture type as identified by our h.264
parser.
Signed-off-by: 's avatarPhilip Langdale <philipl@overt.org>
Signed-off-by: 's avatarMichael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at>
parent 67a316bb
......@@ -713,11 +713,20 @@ static inline CopyRet copy_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx,
}
/*
* Testing has shown that in all cases where we don't want to return the
* full frame immediately, VDEC_FLAG_UNKNOWN_SRC is set.
* The logic here is purely based on empirical testing with samples.
* If we need a second field, it could come from a second input packet,
* or it could come from the same field-pair input packet at the current
* field. In the first case, we should return and wait for the next time
* round to get the second field, while in the second case, we should
* ask the decoder for it immediately.
*
* Testing has shown that we are dealing with the fieldpair -> two fields
* case if the VDEC_FLAG_UNKNOWN_SRC is not set or if the input picture
* type was PICT_FRAME (in this second case, the flag might still be set)
*/
return priv->need_second_field &&
!(output->PicInfo.flags & VDEC_FLAG_UNKNOWN_SRC) ?
(!(output->PicInfo.flags & VDEC_FLAG_UNKNOWN_SRC) ||
pic_type == PICT_FRAME) ?
RET_COPY_NEXT_FIELD : RET_OK;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment